dark light

Joglo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 469 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #302749
    Joglo
    Participant

    😀 Animal, the drummer, was my favourite Muppet.

    in reply to: God bless America!!! #1890390
    Joglo
    Participant

    😀 Animal, the drummer, was my favourite Muppet.

    in reply to: Spitfire wing..a new view #1200837
    Joglo
    Participant

    Fact? Not so, supposition.

    If you say so.

    Check post Nº 7 and read the extract from his letter to Heinkel, I’d say that was fairly self explanatory.

    That he listened to Shenstone is recorded fact.

    Few people like to believe that Mitchell, the genius, would have gleaned information from other sources and prefer to believe that the Spitfire was all his own work, that’s understandable.

    Truth, not supposition, is that in those days, ideas were shared, one reason why many German planes were fitted with RR Kestrel engines at Derby, circa 1934.

    Better than anything he designed? Are we not including the S4 and S5 in that argument then?

    😀 I think we’re talking about ‘gun platforms’ here?
    Even the S.6b wouldn’t have made a very useful fighter?;)

    in reply to: Spitfire wing..a new view #1201202
    Joglo
    Participant

    I think it’s very clear that the Spit wing wasn’t “copied” at all. The He70 wing shape *may* have been an inspiration, but nothing more.

    I’m sure you’re correct that nothing was ever “copied” by anyone and that an “inspiration” is all it takes to move forward.

    Fact is, that Mitchell realised the HE-70 could perform better than anything he’d ever designed and that he bothered to listen to Shenstone is another.

    Strange to note that few aircraft types were built with elliptical wings?
    There were many reasons, difficulty of manufacture being only one.

    Marlyn Munroe

    The misspelt billfish?:D

    in reply to: Spitfire wing..a new view #1201457
    Joglo
    Participant

    Yes, the Spitfire was a masterpiece of engineering, that no one can deny.

    Many of the technical advances in the Spitfire had been made by others: the thin ellipical wings were by Beverley Shenstone, the under-wing radiators at RAE and the monocoque construction had been first developed in the United States.
    Mitchell’s genius was bringing it all together with his experience of high speed flight and the Type 224.

    http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/R._J._Mitchell

    That it was much more difficult for ground crews to repair than the Hurricane is common knowledge and more Spits were written off as a result.

    It would have been foolish to copy the HE-70 wing exactly, mainly because of the difference in size and requirements of each aircraft.

    The Spit took 3 times more man hours to construct that the 109, but was probably worth it in the long run.

    in reply to: General Discussion #302964
    Joglo
    Participant

    Also good for ripping up the floor in the supermarket.

    They’re only to be used for the walking on ice bit.:rolleyes:
    Carry a pair of trainers in your handbag when you do the shopping.:D

    Thing is, the styles of those things make you look a bit like the fat loud guy out of Caddyshack.

    No worse than the average pair of trainers?

    Believe it or not, golf shoes come in very ordinary looking styles, but if they save you from having a nasty fall, who cares what they look like?

    in reply to: Snow #1890533
    Joglo
    Participant

    Also good for ripping up the floor in the supermarket.

    They’re only to be used for the walking on ice bit.:rolleyes:
    Carry a pair of trainers in your handbag when you do the shopping.:D

    Thing is, the styles of those things make you look a bit like the fat loud guy out of Caddyshack.

    No worse than the average pair of trainers?

    Believe it or not, golf shoes come in very ordinary looking styles, but if they save you from having a nasty fall, who cares what they look like?

    in reply to: Spitfire wing..a new view #1201968
    Joglo
    Participant

    in reply to Joglo’s statement that Mitchell had copied the the He 70, it wasn’t Ernst Heinkel that designed the He70, it was Siegfried Gunther, who, (whilst working for Heinkel) visited the US to “bone up” on high speed design.

    I mentioned the Günther brothers, Siegried and Walter, in an earlier thread.

    The design of the six engined flying boat predates the He 70 by a couple of years (1929);

    Agreed, but check out Walter Günter’s involvement in the elliptically winged Bäumer B II Sausewind of 1925.
    http://www.histaviation.com/B_IVa_colour_profile_152x205.jpg

    Joglo, if you can show that the internal construction of the Spitfire wing is the same as the He70, then you might be on to something.

    That might be a tall order now, a nice lady at Heinkel, curtly informed me that all the drawings were lost in the war.

    The Spitfires predecessor was designed to a ministry specification, and the evaporative steam cooling dictated a deeper leading edge to accomodate the condensers; to ask why the spitfire bore no resemblance to the aforementioned A/C, is like saying why did it itself bear no resemblance to the S6 or the S5 or the S4, or even the Southampton ; or else to ask Neil Young, why his current record is nothing like his last…….

    Agreed, once again.
    The only part that defies logic, is that Mitchell suddenly came up with a radically different design to anything he’d ever attempted before.

    F.7/30, 1934, gull wing, spats ‘n all:
    http://www.modelflight.regheath.com/mf093/images/F.730(Spitfire)small.jpg

    Hawker Hurricane, Nov., 1935.
    No photo required.

    K5054, March, 1936.
    No photo required.

    HE-70, Dec, 1932.
    http://www.modelflight.regheath.com/mf093/images/spitfireComparisonsmall.jpgWith an old friend for comparison.

    in reply to: General Discussion #303043
    Joglo
    Participant

    A tip for anyone who doesn’t want to slip over on icy pavements.

    Invest in a cheap pair of golf shoes with metal spikes.

    I used to run uphill in icy weather with them on.

    NB: Can’t run much at all nowadays, tempus fugit etc., but no ice here worth mentioning, so no problems.
    Still have the shoes though.

    in reply to: Snow #1890559
    Joglo
    Participant

    A tip for anyone who doesn’t want to slip over on icy pavements.

    Invest in a cheap pair of golf shoes with metal spikes.

    I used to run uphill in icy weather with them on.

    NB: Can’t run much at all nowadays, tempus fugit etc., but no ice here worth mentioning, so no problems.
    Still have the shoes though.

    in reply to: Spitfire wing..a new view #1202187
    Joglo
    Participant

    Why are you persisting with this idea that Mitchell copied the HE-70?

    For fairly obvious reasons.
    Have you bothered to compare his previous entry for the eight gun fighter, F.7/30, the original “Spitfire?”
    That was built in 1934, then lo and behold, two years later, after seeing the HE-70, out of his head pops the type 300, even with exactly the same retractable u/c layout.

    Hats off to him for seeing what a good design it was, but sad that only he gave credit to Heinkel for opening his eyes, but no one else appears willing to.

    Mitchell wrote:

    “We, at Supermarine Aviation, were particularly impressed, since we have been unable to achieve such smooth lines in the aircraft that we entered for the Schneider Trophy Races…. In addition to this, we recently investigated the effect that installing certain new British fighter engines would have on the He 70, We were dismayed to find that your new aircraft, despite its larger measurements, is appreciably faster than our fighters. It is indeed a triumph.”

    in reply to: General Discussion #303065
    Joglo
    Participant

    Do I qualify for “Grumpy Old Men” yet?

    It’s actually called, Grumpier Old Men and has recently become a knitting circle, due mainly to over moderation.;)

    in reply to: Snow #1890586
    Joglo
    Participant

    Do I qualify for “Grumpy Old Men” yet?

    It’s actually called, Grumpier Old Men and has recently become a knitting circle, due mainly to over moderation.;)

    in reply to: Spitfire wing..a new view #1202369
    Joglo
    Participant

    Link doesn’t work, 404 not found.

    It’s always good to remember that Mitchell had the benefit of viewing the HE-70 at Derby and at the very least being able to study photos of it before he came up with the same elliptical wing idea, something that had never featured on any of his previous designs.
    In fact the type 300, was basically a scaled down version of the HE-70.

    For some unknown reason and thankfully, no one in Germany realised the full potential of the HE-70 design.

    in reply to: General Discussion #303090
    Joglo
    Participant

    Sent home?…No, not even the 1964 freeze.

    That was the winter of 62/3.

    47 was the best/worst I can remember, my brother made a sled, hooked our chow dog up to it and they once pulled me home from school on it.
    From January 22nd to March 17th of that year, snow fell every day and I never missed a day at school and apart from the one off sled incident, I walked.
    February 1947, was the coldest February on record at that time in many parts of the UK and daylight was grotty.
    It wasn’t until 63 that the UK had a colder winter, but less snowfall. Easy for me to remember, I got married later that year.:(

    Nearly forgot to mention, I was still wearing short trousers in 47, like all the other lads, the lucky ones had socks!

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 469 total)