Of course he was!!
JN got a ban for a silly, childish remark about a certain nationality (someone will have to explain to me how that’s “racist”: are you and I from a different “race”?)
A French poster gloried in the idea that a jihadist would use a Typhoon to commit a further attrocity such as July 7th, 2005 on London. His punishment? The thread was sanitized: no further action.
Why should an obviously knowledgeable contributor like JN get a ban when there are two Trolls posting abusive and personally insulting messages to this forum? It’s been going on for months yet no action is taken.
well, saying that 9/11 jihadist was using airliners to attack NY are facts, that all mind tank is from saudi, and that the londonistan is the shelter of jihadists around the world, for years, if somes saudies pilotes would fall for allah, why not, no glory, no hopes, appart from your spin there pilothgt, oops i mean steve!
and stop to use French squadron sigh in yours posts!
Fonky, arguing with them is all about “superiority”!
i’m amazed, really, i point the eurofighter isn’t a bad plane as an old cold war jerk, i talk about modernity rather than “superiority” , the typhee fanzine is deep about ej200 and captor, how could be a modern plane only reduced to it engines and radar range only when it grows 2t in weight!
so Fonk, we don’t speak same language, they are all about “better” and “superiority” based on streams biased falses web datas, and we ask about “modernity” and “versatility” on plateform as Rafale!
Scorpion,
i have a AFM of the 1998 year, and the dossier on eurofighter show datas from BAe systems releazed in 1998!
weight is 9,750t, and the same biased perfomances of the today official web site!
in 2002 eurofighter was 11,150t, even not full final loads!
i think real datas today weight is 11,500t and quite lower performances than propaganda web site could claim!
so stop your spin on it, scorpion, you are a fan, trying to be fair and logical, but all you opinions are based on biased datas!
trolls such as nungressor produce pointless attacks on the Typhoon.
Pointless? if getting 20% more on what is the core of a airplane agility, i mean Weight isn’t changing performances datas from typhoons spinners list isn’t a real material? or pointless!
damned, i’m thinking about all engeneers that worked on composits material to light up the bird, and thier dished dreams!
even my little nefew know more about that any 80’s mecanical antenna working on power emmiting “semi active doctrine” will no more being an agressor into modern fighter battles, but a target, Rafale will get an AESA that will not emitting more waves lenghts but increasing sensitivity to see farer, and without liting Foes RWR as “captor ” is designed to do, my litle nefew seems to be more educated than you, in physics!
it seems you are looking on the wrong side of the trolling mob!
well said fonky, i will decrease my post on eurofunnier, i could be seen as an anti typhee monger!
till the blind backers don’t reflect about structural realities of this plane, things will not get beter!
The Typhoon probably has a slight edge in terms of outright turn performance but it is not much. I don´t want this thread to degenerate into a “let´s trash the Typhoon” thread.
what can make you thinking this?
the eurofighter problems are first his design, that he took 2t from performances evaluations to service operational, and that all datas wasn’t upgraded fairly!
i don’t think the roll rate will be quite lower, but agility of a plane that is 20% overweight without upgrading the propulsion and shapes down the performances of the plane!
this plane had and have software problems due to design and poor abilities to operate with charges, tough they removed the gun !
and that this plane is exactly what europe don’t need, falling into the BAe spin to get money and poor products!
landing gear are Messier bugatti, but rafale have the same and never crash over landing for 15 years!
and beleive me, landing on aircrafts carriers are quite more stressing for all the bird, especially landing gears!