dark light

Levsha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 2,665 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Military Aviation News 2011 June – #2308087
    Levsha
    Participant

    And what’s so difficult about cleaning runways?:confused:

    in reply to: DC9 nearly looses engines on heavy landing (photo!) #566333
    Levsha
    Participant

    Metal fatigue on a 35 year old aircraft?

    in reply to: General Discussion #289166
    Levsha
    Participant

    I thought a board member had died there for a moment…

    Levsha
    Participant

    I thought a board member had died there for a moment…

    in reply to: Russian aircraft for Latvia? #2311250
    Levsha
    Participant

    Really, I couldn’t help notice “The Valley of the Fairy Chimneys” dead centre of the map – sounds like a name J.R Tolkien might have invented.
    Have you been there too?

    in reply to: Russian aircraft for Latvia? #2311464
    Levsha
    Participant

    Hotdog, you’re a funny guy – you sure know how to push it, don’t you…:D

    Anyway, most of these Baltic states have loads of ex-soviet equipment in their militaries already – Mi-8 helicopters come to mind.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311561
    Levsha
    Participant

    Thinking back to 2003, I flew Kuban airlines from either Vnukovo or Bykovo to Krasnodar (Pashkovskii) when I lived in Krasnodar for 6 months or so. Yak-42.
    I still remember the light blue vinyl passenger seats of the Yak…

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311626
    Levsha
    Participant

    In fact, reviewing Igor’s blog once more, certainly the first 2 photos are as you say, Panki. The next 5 photos are of Bykovo airport, what used to be one of the main Moscow passenger airports dealing with internal flights. According to the blogger it’s now closed. In fact, it seems to be used as some sort of car park?:eek:

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311636
    Levsha
    Participant

    In Panki?

    More than likely, But the other photos are Zhukovsky (South east Moscow)

    in reply to: A new airline on the South Coast! #567812
    Levsha
    Participant

    How many Let-410s are operated by small regional airlines in Europe anyway?

    Although I suspect the Let-410 on the company’s website is only there because of “stock image” availability?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311871
    Levsha
    Participant

    Just found these aerial photos of the Gromov flight test centre (Zhukovsky) at Igor113’s blog.

    I think these are the first photos I’ve seen which just about give you an impression of the scale of Zhukovsky airfield – MASSIVE…:)

    http://igor113.livejournal.com/193718.html

    in reply to: A new airline on the South Coast! #567817
    Levsha
    Participant

    Is that a Let-410 I see on the top of their webpage? Is that the very type they intend to use?
    Wouldn’t that be a somewhat unorthodox choice?:confused:

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2311998
    Levsha
    Participant

    But Su-47 was later modified to aid in PAK-FA program. Surely it flew more than 150 hours in total.

    I agree that aerodynamic research was primary purpose of Su-47, but nonetheless Sukhoi did show that it could make an aircraft with a flat belly and S-ducts without a problem. Hence, the lack of those in the PAK-FA is not indicative of anything.

    The Su-47 is certainly still being used as a testbed – has flown 337 flights by the beginning of 2010.

    Сколько всего на текущий день совершено полетов (хотя бы порядок?)
    – Всего сделано 337 вылетов (начало 2010 года)

    http://paralay.com/s37.html

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2312400
    Levsha
    Participant

    Trident, I can agree with that, the main focus of the Su-47 was to test forward swept wings – with the added bonus of learning more about S-ducts at high alphas. The thing is, the Su-47 only flew for 150 hours or so in its original flight test programme, barely enough to gain data on the basic aerodynamics. The Grumman X-29 flew 436 sorties in its programme.

    I can’t help thinking that nothing was learnt from the Su-47 that wasn’t already learnt from the X-29?:confused:

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2312419
    Levsha
    Participant

    2. The s-duct on the Su-47 worked very well, allowing an engine which was not designed for manoeuvring flight to operate safely even in difficult airflow conditions despite having no moving parts other than a dorsal auxiliary inlet.

    3. So, in summary Sukhoi has demonstrated the ability to successfully design and build an s-duct – if they still don’t adopt it for production then logically they must have a different solution which suits their requirements even better.

    Trident, how do you know this – have you actually read the flight test results document?
    Just because the Su-47 flies very well at low speeds does not tell us a lot about its RCS figures or its high cruise performance?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,531 through 1,545 (of 2,665 total)