I’m surprised nobody has mentioned it yet.
Bulava has failed a test launch yet again:
http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20091030_3645.php
http://www.ng.ru/nvo/2009-10-30/1_bulava.html?mthree=9
Also interesting to read that the development of Bulava may consume up to half of all Russian defence purchasing.
The most widely used aircraft is Mi-8/Mi-17 utility helicopter, followed by C-47/DC3/BT67 Dakota and UH-1 Huey/Twin Huey. After these come SA316 Alouette III, C-130 Hercules, Mi-24/35 Hind and T-6 Texan.
Are you sure about that, most widely used I would have though it was these 3 candidates:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_172
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_206
If your talking about purely military service what about the F-16?
Yes, in my eyes it was symmetrical.
BTW, stockpiles of brand new combat aircraft, SAM systems, helicopters and missiles were delivered to Iran, just few years before, especially in early 70s. It was actually an even better situation since they have had time to properly train and master their equipment.
It depends on your definition of symmetrical.
If you mean two authoritarian dysfunctional oil-rich Middle Eastern states fighting each other with 3rd generation aircraft, MiG-23/F-4 Phantom, then you may have a point.
But the fact remains Iraq had the continued support of two world powers: France and USSR, who provided material technical and training support to Iraq throughout the 8 years of the war with Iran. Iran got nobody’s support during the war. The war might have been more ‘symmetrical’ if the Shah had never been deposed from power and the USA still continued to give support to Iran’s war effort. In which case Iran would certainly have been receiving extra F-14s (deliveries were already planned) F-16s, and AIM-9L AAM from an early stage of the war.
Remember, Iran’s F-4s were on average 10 years older than Iraq’s MiG-23s – while the USA was supplying ME client states with F-14 and F-15 by the late 1970s, Soviet client states like Syria and Iraq were at that time lucky to get the ‘monkey version’ MiG-23MS!!:eek:
I believe that the Iranians received SOME help from the USSR …………..
The Iran-Iraq was a (sadly all too typical) war by proxy where both sides were armed by superpowers.
Iran receive help from USSR, did they? I don’t think Iran got much from the USSR, relations between the two countries weren’t very good at the time.
Iran did receive some material from China, but it was basically dated stuff and it was to little to make much difference.
Yes, I find this very suspicious. Every loss is immediately attributed to AAA or SAM, smells like marketing to me. Symmetrical conflicts like Iran vs Iraq have shown that Russian aircraft are perfectly capable to shoot down their Western equivalents, even more advanced opponents (read MiG-21 kills against F-5E/F-4E or MiG-23 kills against F-4E/F-14A).
The Iraq Iran war was symetrical?:confused:
How many new combat aircraft, SAM systems, missiles, PGMs, Exocets were delivered to Iran in the 1980-1987 war?
What kind of Intelligence support did Iran receive from the Americans, in the same way that the Americans supplied it to the Iraqis?
That’s true for the early Mig-29’s…..I’m not sure it applies to the SU-27.
The Taiwanese-AF is now saying that the Mirage-2000 is very expensive to maintain so…
… and the Malayasians are now saying that they’re going to retire the MiG-29 pretty soon as it’s become too costly to keep in service. quiete frankly I have reading reports of Malaysia’s difficulties with their MiG-29s for a few years now. It would be interesting to find out how much it costs to maintain the MiG in comparison with the F/A-18C in the Malaysian air force.
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=93109&page=16
AFAIK Egyptian MiG-21MF:
1979 – fitted with AIM-9P (AIM-9J1?)
1981 – Combined Soviet/Western IFF, ALE-40 decoys, RWR. However, planned upgrade with APQ-159 radar cancelled.
1984 – AIM-9P3. Some fitted with ALQ-234 jammer pod
1989 – AIM-9L
2008 – Possibly fitted with HMS
Didn’t Egyptian MiG-21s get Martin Baker ejection seats as well?
Yes, I knew the Orao with AGM-65.
But if you can read the International Air Power Review Volumen 8, page 84, it´s said: “…. MiG-21 made sweeps over the Croat capital of Zabreb and, on 7 October, a very precise attack was launched on the Presidential Palace with infra-red guided AGM-65 Maverick misiles, belived to hav been fired from a MiG-29. Croatian President Franjo Tudjman, was oly a few feet away from the impact area but surived….”
No, it was an Orao, I can still remember the news coverage of the event since then. Incidently, what’s an ‘infra-red guided AGM-65’, you mean a Maverick with thermal imaging seeker? The Yugoslavs certainly didn’t have those in 1991!
guys, this is a very rare and unique Iranian phantom… because it´s a IRIAF F-4E with a sharkmouth..!!
Why is it so rare to see Sharkmouths on Iranian planes?
Is it because the depiction of animate objects (people, animals) in any art form frowned upon, if not forbidden, by many Islamic authorities who regard it as a false form of Idolatry?:confused:
I’ve asked before and i’ll ask again. Where in hades are they going to put enough fuel in that airframe to patrol the northern frontiers?
Isn’t that what the MiG-31BM supposed to be for, as it was originally designed for?:confused:
I was watching Black Hawk Down last night, and came up with a rather silly question.
How better would the helicopter have performed if fitted with a fenestron instead of a conventional tail rotor?
Regards.
Are helicopters equiped with ‘Fenestron’ tail rotors any less vulnerable to RPGs?:confused:
The R-35 from the 70s was based on a design from the 60s and did demonstrate how far it could be pushed then.
Something similar from the 50s, when the development of that was stopped in the 60s to switch to the Tf technology, which is the standard in fighter engines today. 😉
http://www.pw.utc.com/vgn-ext-templating/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=c4fa26c6d9903210VgnVCM1000004f62529fRCRD
You don’t have to go to America to find a comparable aero engine to the R-35 and there wasn’t such an immediate swing to Turbofans in the Sixties and the Seventies either. By far the most advanced airliner of that time flew with ‘pure’ turbojets.;)
The prototype looked so ugly, made the pilots head look like a dragonfly’s head. Now this is better and more humanish. I am sure the other HMD would have made alien fanatics believe the F 35 tech is passed down from aliens.
Pilots have been wearing ‘ugly’ and ‘unhumanish’ headwear since the dawn of aviation – they’re called oxygen masks. But hey, didn’t Nostrodamus predict that wars would be fought by pig-like men (pilots?), which many regard as a prediction of aerial warfare.
Maybe the great prophet was staring into his amazing bowl of water for the latest quatrain one day, and a Lockheed-Martin promo video turned up… who knows?:confused:;)
I wouldn’t be surprised if the F-14 could launch 2 AIM-7s at 2 different targets at the same time, seen as it could do it with the Phoenix missile and the AIM-54 is also a SARH missile in its initial launch stage(if not for most of its flight path to the target). Don’t know for sure though.
What do you expect from an American made programme. A national bias is to be expected from every country I suppose. I bet on a French or Russian made show only the Rafale and Su-35 rules. As it happens, I haven’t seen too many French documentaries but I know for a fact concerning Russian TV, having seen enough Russian TV when I lived there for a while.
Yugoslav(ian) Soko Gazelle with Strela (SA-7), and Serbian Gazelle with licence made Malyutka missile (AT-3 SAGGER) (http://www.aviation-spotting.bloger.hr).