dark light

Levsha

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 2,665 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2153616
    Levsha
    Participant

    IE when you want to export stuff you are in direct competition with your partners, so you have to take turns who is going to market something somewhere.

    How many Dassault Mercure airliners did France export in the 1970s? How many airliners did France export in total in the 1960s and 1970s?

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2153668
    Levsha
    Participant

    Pilot who shot down Syrian jet speaks

    Save the RN.org from The Navy Times.com

    This is funny – from the same article:

    The AIM-9X is the latest version of a very well proven family of missiles and it would not be expected to be fooled by flares or fail against such an obsolete aircraft. (The UK uses the superior ASRAAM, although it shares some common components with the Sidewinder).

    Doesn’t the “superior” ASRAAM use the same IIR seeker as the AIM-9X, so might suffer the same problems against Syrian flares?

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2153669
    Levsha
    Participant

    Even if the Tiger is a remarkable platform in term of agility, it early versions proved often inadequate to combat with Fr soldering on the old Gazelle even in the most dangerous zone (see Lybia). And I am not even mentioning the inacceptable anemic sortie rate or the cost of spare.
    Regarding the NH90, you have a system well known for being a decade late, that have quite inadequate exit or defensive geometry for an assault helo and with a heavy share of scandalous corrosion problem (that were discussed heavily here).

    When it come to producing 2-seat helicopter gunships lke the Tiger, Apache, Mangusta, Mi-28, Rooivalk, etc it usually takes years before you can ever declare them a success. I’d say only Apache and AH-1 are the only aircraft of such type to have achieved later widespread sales and operational success. As it happens over 500 Tigers and NH-90s together have been delivered so it’s not a complete disaster. Plenty of A320 and A350 airliner sales to compensate.

    in reply to: German F-104 & F-4F #2153963
    Levsha
    Participant

    You have to factor the different weather conditions b/w central Eu and Australia.

    What is the difference between the 2 country’s climates – is it even relevant?

    in reply to: German F-104 & F-4F #2153968
    Levsha
    Participant

    Could be a “pick any, all, or none”, German F-104 attrition rates weren’t outrageous compared to other first time operators of high performance late ’50’s era fighters as you and others have pointed out.

    A good example would the RAAF Mirage III – 36% losses.

    http://www.adf-gallery.com.au/3a3%20losses.htm

    http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/482493-raaf-mirage-3-losses.html

    in reply to: German F-104 & F-4F #2153996
    Levsha
    Participant

    A very interesting interview for those who haven’t watched it yet. The biggest thing I took away from it was that the F-104 certainly had many accidents but it wasn’t the disaster that many people seem to think and there were tons of contributing factors to cause the losses that weren’t necessarily the fault of the jet itself. It was a good aircraft in many ways.

    Good interview indeed. I don’t think the F-104 had anymore accidents than other combat aircraft of era and generation. An aircraft I like a lot, along with many other Century series aircraft.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2153998
    Levsha
    Participant

    Source:
    FowNews.com

    What website have you actually linked to – it’s not telling me a whole lot about the catapult system on the USS Gerald Ford.

    Has your account been hacked?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2174317
    Levsha
    Participant

    Ah yeah I forgot the pedal turn, but wasn’t this useless when only russkie planes could do it?

    It’s useless for any aircraft that tries to do it. It has no practical application in aerial combat. It is useful for displaying some of the flying qualities of the aircraft, they say.

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2184619
    Levsha
    Participant

    The demo itself is not particularly impressive, I was hoping the pilot would be more aggressive.

    Where did you get that idea – I thought the pilot was being aggressive enough – he was certainly doing a lot of hif´gh speed turn rates pulling a lot of G.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2190314
    Levsha
    Participant

    If the roles were reversed and these were American jets intercepting Russian nuclear-capable bombers in the Mexican Gulf mere miles from the US mainland, imagine the media outrage. Haha… Well, one does not have to resort to hypotheticals in this case, or even leave the Baltic and the Russian coast:

    But, but Russia has been flying Bears and Tu-160s of the US coast (and other countries) for years…

    https://theaviationist.com/2014/06/12/tu-95-intercepted-by-f22s/
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/mar/24/raf-tornados-intercept-russian-aircraft

    Mind you, it is somewhat incongruous to see B-1B and B-52 over the Baltic Sea, have they any operational or tactical (as opposed to political reasons) reasons being there?

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2205897
    Levsha
    Participant

    Not sure how accurate:

    Kh-58USh: range 250km – accurate?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2207081
    Levsha
    Participant

    Look at MIG35 and than imgine Su-35 performance.

    Why would I look at a MiG-35?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2207089
    Levsha
    Participant

    I wouldn’t rely on Youtube videos of airshows to assess the combat capabilities of aircraft. Also the F-15E is a lot lighter than the Su-35S – T/W ratio should be better?

    in reply to: 2017 F-35 news and discussion thread #2207131
    Levsha
    Participant

    Mig-29 is probably on another league compared to T-38 but F-15E is perfectly equal or even better than Su-35

    F-15SG in most respects, no worse than Su-35. Same goes for any F-15C with an AESA radar upgrade.

    in reply to: British and Japan: new stealth fighter? #2207159
    Levsha
    Participant

    The real problem is lack of political will and funding.. Japan was more than willing to buy some F-22s for say $150mil a pop in 2008, but they would be hesitant to spend ~$60 billion just to learn how to design and make something comparable, in order to finally get like 100 pieces, without any export potential.. Such investment simply doesn’t make sense. There is only as much as you can do with a defense budget totaling $41 bil annually.

    The same logic could also apply to the PAK FA – the Russian government didn’t hesitate.

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 2,665 total)