Sounds almost like a re-run of Count Rosen’s “Biafran Babes” Bolkows.
True, but I have more in mind the so called “Night Witches”- the Soviet women pilots who flew night-time bombing missions against the Germans in WW II, flying Polikarpov Po-2s.
I’ve just been reading about them in the book “A Dance with Death” by Anne Noggle. I recommend it highly.
As with the Night witches, you may wonder if the Tamils are spending their resources the right way, buying the aircraft and training up flight crews, etc, considering the limited amount of damage they could ever hope to cause!
Someone pulling shenanigans? The last one is a rafale.
They both look like SAABs to me, what with the canard delta layout. The middle one a Viggen, the last one a Gripen…
According to Aircraft 1974 the one on the far left was. The book had both that picture and one of the developed FV-12 and said it was associated with the Sea Control Concept.
I hope SOC wasn’t holding his breath waiting for that answer, or he’d be pretty blue in the face, waiting 3 years after asking the question.:D
Two MiG-29s have been lost in a mid-air collision – according to the RBK news agency.
The two aircraft were on a training flight when they collided with each other while flying over the Sholokhovskii district in the Rostov Region of Southern Russia. The pilots of both planes were able to eject from their aircraft and survived the incident.
A crash investigation team has been sent to the crash site.
Apart from that JSF/F-22 mixup. the article accurately sums the reality. if F-22 total project costs are around $65B. there is no reason to doubt that Russians cannot achieve 200 PAK-FA under $20B assuming PPP values.
which is well under there financial means for next 10 years.
the cost of processors, T/R modules, Fibre optics, LCDs, advance manufacturing techniquies, computer aided designs, engine technology were much higher when F-22 was started in early 90s.
What!!!!
So let me get this straight.
Because the Russian Federation is a significantly less well off country, with workers’ salaries and national GDP being only a fraction of America’s, along with Russian military spending being only around 5% of America’s, you really believe that the Russian air force should be able to take delivery of 200 fifth generation fighter aircraft when the time comes – as opposed to America being only being able to afford 180 (so far)!
Where did you learn your Mathematics and Economics…?:confused: :confused:
Meanwhile Russia’s Sukhoi, the world’s only competitor of America in aircraft technologies of the fifth generation,
That’s a pretty tall claim.
Do we actually know enough about Sukhoi’s PAK-FA to really accept ‘in blind faith’ that it really will be ‘fifth Generation’, especially as regards Stealth and Net-centric technologies?:confused:
Let’s remind that what is meant is not the world’s only aircraft with the forward-swept wings (Su-47), which was used as a flying laboratory for the fifth generation, but a totally new machine, which nobody has seen so far.
Obviously never heard of Grumman’s X-29…:rolleyes:
There were various 5/7/9-ship MiG-15/17/19 aerobatic ‘teams’ – some of which had red topsides – but they were not named as such – that is a relatively modern practice – as with the Strizhi & Russki Vityazi.
I think the most famous Soviet ‘red’ display team aircraft I know of would have to be the all-red Yak -15s used in formation displays over Tushino and Red Square in the late 1940s and 1950s. I believe the MiG-9 was also similarly painted and displayed.
I also corresponded with him about the possibility of such a team – and he replied, to the effect that :- “why would you use a Su-15 – not exactly noted for its manoeuvreability – for aerobatics”??
Well, I guess the Su-15 would be a bit large and unwieldy for an airshow display team (and a bit expensive too) – but can you imagine the sound of all those engines as they zoom by in formation…:cool:
Mind you, any allegations of poor agility never stopped the USAF “Thunderbirds” display team from using these 2 types below…
Thunderbirds F-105B and F-4E, plus ‘krasniye’ Yak-15s…
This is great! I got my peanuts and chips ready, plus a bottle of finest Lipton Ice Tea Green, let the show begin, folks! 😉
Do you expect the HUD camera recording to to be replayed at a news conference in Havana or Caracas any time soon?
Don’t hold your breath…:rolleyes:
Why are twin-engine aircraft are considered so much better?
I always thought that the US Navy preferred twinned engined planes for carrier-borne aviation in the same way that it always preferred radial piston engined planes before the jet age – for greater reliability. But guess what! the future great white hope for USN and Royal Navy carrier operations (along with a few other countries) is the F-35… a single engined aircraft.
And let’s not forget all those countries that continue to operate single engined aircraft from carriers, all those Harriers, A-4 Skyhawks, Super Etenards…
Some quick research on the Net revealed that the IAC are still operating 7 out of the 8 Alouette III helicopters which they first took delivery in November 1963 – and probably won’t finally retire them until the IAC takes final delivery of the rest of their AW-139s
Can anyone tell me if there are any other helis as old as these, specifically turbine aircraft, in service in any other air arm around the world? The S-61 and CH-46 do spring to mind.
Thanks again for the article and info! I would be intrigued to know whether the soon to fly Su-35 will be fitted with a system like this?:confused:
Yes, the various air-launched versions of the Club family of cruise missiles are slated for carriage on the Su-35, Su-27KUB and MiG-35 – according to the article.
According to Andrea Fomin (in another source), the Su-35 should carry three of them.
Which hopefully will be sooner rather than later given that we are dependant on a seriously overstretched RAF in the event of the need for an airborne intercept of anything heavy….
Do you seriously think that the Irish government are going to order a squadron of F-16s or Grippens any day soon?? :rolleyes:
I know there was a tread here before about cheap unsophisticated fighters for the less well off nations……Now what would be nice?
Would you call Ireland, the so called “Celtic Tiger”, a less well off country?
Our fellow EU members like Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic have MiG-29s, JA39 Grippens in service in their air arms, and these countries are by no means flush with cash either!
Finland, a country also comparable to Ireland in population and economy, took delivery of 64 F/A-18C/Ds in the last ten years or so, which for a while made the Finnish air force the most advanced in Europe!:eek:
I think the Irish are suffering more from some sort of sturgid mind set, rather than a paucity of cash. They’re passing the buck basically…
The prototype in question flew with MiG-31 engines?
No, It was the forward swept-winged Su-47 Berkut which flew with the MiG-31 engine, or a variation of it, the D-30F-11, with an altered afterburner and nozzle section.
Add up the number of E 3s and B-1Bs and compare with the number of Mig-31s and you could say they have more experience with PESAs in aircraft.
Add up all the actual flying hours achieved by the E-3 and the B-1B and then compare with the actual total hours flown by the MiG-31 – we can then perhaps say who has the real experience with airborne PESA…
YF-110… MiG-21
YF-113… MiG-23
The YF-112 and YF-114 designations were also used for MiGs in US service, but I’m not sure which ones… any ideas??:confused: :confused:
And the US shuttle isn’t?
Didn’t try to deny that for one moment!
Even NASA’s chief Director (or a previous one) admitted that the Shuttle programme was probably a big mistake.
And now it’s being replaced by a new bell shaped 3 man crewed “capsule” system that looks suspiciously like the old Apollo…:rolleyes: :confused:
Bad case of deja-vous for all involved!:rolleyes: