Exactly which part of the claim that UAF might have been using civilian lines as cover for their aircraft looks like a “conspiracy” to you? It is an entirely realistic possibility, with no links to Illuminati, little green men, chemtrails or similar stuff.
If this is the line of argumentation you want to apply to counter my claims, please do us both afavor and restrain from answering to my posts.
Thanks.
It’s quite fascinating that you say that without a blink in the eye but at the same time don’t ask yourself why on earth would someone allow an airliner over such zone..
No, it is a very serious accusation to make, and it is up to you, the person making the accusation, to provide the evidence to show that the Ukrainian af were indeed using international passenger flights as ‘cover’. Tell us, why would the Ukrainian AF need such cover – how would Ukrainian Su-25s operating below 10,000 feet take advantage as cover of a Malysian Boeing 777 flying at 33,000 feet?
It’s quite fascinating that you say that without a blink in the eye but at the same time don’t ask yourself why on earth would someone allow an airliner over such zone..
I agree that is a very good question. I suppose the Kiev government were very hesitant to declare that they had lost control of a large section of their own sovereign air space- which country’s government wouldn’t – without taking a realistic assessment as to what a Buk M1 SAM system running amok might actually do. Certainly the Kiev government must take equal responsibilty for the shooting down of the airliner.
Sign In
