It’s as fast as the VVS is prepared to pay for, most likely. If there were problems with keeping up with domestic demand, they could hardly have accepted the order from China.
Are you sure that order from China is going through – has it been confirmed yet?
it’s russian, i can’t read it 🙁
In fact he hasn’t even mentioned which aircraft type he is describing – but I think it’s the Su-24 – Mach 1.6 is the normally quoted top speed for the type…
Same with Su-24 which were modded with fixed intakes and are unable to reach the quoted speeds anymore
I thought the Su-24 was designed with fixed intakes from the very beginning? Or at least very few, if any, production Su-24s came with variable inlets?
It was said that it was used in the Argentine war…known as VIFFING
And it’s said that there has been no actual record of the Harrier ever using VIFFing during the Argentine war, it’s fiction?
no, Vietnam War ended in mid-1975
Syria received its first MiG-23s in 1973
The air war (air-to-air combat at least) over Vietnam was pretty much over by the end of 1973.
http://www.acig.info/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=244&Itemid=47
http://www.acig.info/CMS/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=242&Itemid=47
What if North Vietnam received MiG-23s in 1973-5. how would it alter the air war in Vietnam?
First MiG-23s exported only after the end of the Vietnam war. The MiG-23M was only entering service with the USSR itself in the above mentioned time-frame.
The main reason the North Vietnam air force was not so successful against the Americans was probably simple because there were not enough MiG-21s available at any one time – the NVAF was too small.
With introduction of Zaslon, N001 and Zhuk with look down/shoot down, TSR-2 would have been retired and share museum space beside the F-111, which was retired for that reason.
In which case why hasn’t the USAF also retired their F-15Es?
Frankly I find your grand-standing over this matter and even your profile signature to be offensive Nic. I know you have your opinions but I think you are going beyond the pale now!
Indeed, I didn’t know France operated the B-52…
I don’t like Western style aircraft and even I think its awesome.
What on earth is a ‘Western style aircraft’?
Conformal tanks are essentially drag neutral at cruise speed but impose a penalty at transonic speeds. (No surprises)
Is that not also true for the CFTs on F-15 and F-16?
Is this photo for real?:confused:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]216876[/ATTACH]
Indian Airforce flying Russian types has been very succesfull against pakistani air force that was supplied with US types….is it so hard for you to understand that US made planes can be beaten in Air to air combat by Russian made planes? There are no absolutes in war. Ask the US pilots that fought in Korea what the Russians and the Chinese where flying? Planes made in Germany, Mars or russian made Mig-15s?
Most IAF kills against the PAF in the 1965 – 1971 time period were with British and French built aircraft: Hunter, Gnat, Mystere etc. MiG-21 did shoot down a few F-104 though…
What is the point/goal of this thread? Serbia is still recovering from the Balkan conflict. It takes time to recover. Slovakia peacefully broke away from the Czech Republic and downsized its military due to there being no credible threat.
Friday night is always a good time for creating the more “unorthodox” threads. It’s good for the vintners and Brewing industry – unsuspecting forum members log in to read some intelligent discussion only to find themselves driven out to the nearest bar and Kniepe to escape the weirdest fantasies and drivel. I think Y-20 bacon/Hotdog could be the paid shill of Diageo or Heineken or some other alco firm…:confused:
USA: F-105
USSR: MiG-21
&
UK: TSR2:)
– there will be no other alternative to F-35 for NATO/western countries
– both should be more affordable than F-35
– both will be full NATO compatibile
– both will use results of European R&D and can help and bring benefits (and employees) for European industry in many areas (SAAB, Eurojet etc.)
– many European countries will need relatively cheap and affordable replacement for 4th generation fighters in 2030s and later, for example: Finland, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Greece, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania, (Germany? :rolleyes:)…
(BTW both fighters could have good export potential: KF-X/IF-X especially in Southeast Asia and Pacific region – Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore… – and TF-X in Middle East and Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Morocco and…Azerbaijan of course.)
Geo
What makes you think they will be cheaper? Is Mitsubishi F-2 a cheap airplane, compared to say a Eurocanard or F-16?