dark light

shadowpuppet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 144 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sea Gripen – MERGED #2412301
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    Scooter, is that you?

    in reply to: Sea Gripen – MERGED #2412893
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    Or commission a suitable straight wing asset that can do the job for 2-3 aircraft at a time. You’re still going to need straight wing assets for setting up the offboard radar pickets and cargo hauling. Helicopters can only do so much of those duties.

    On that note – has the C-2 ever been trialled or used as a tanker for the USN?

    in reply to: Rise of the Sea Gripen #2009841
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    That’s just an image from MS Flight Simulator, credited to someone with the username scenium.

    I give you scenium:

    http://www.youtube.com/user/Scenium

    It’s not a marketing image

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2418908
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    No that’s PAK-FA. I recently found this leaked image (the real thing I swear) on the paralay boards and it matches it PERFECTLY:
    http://www.collectiondx.com/gallery2/gallery/d/75452-5/P4204743.jpg

    I don’t think you should leak images of the MiG Ug-Bird on a western forum like this 😡

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2418920
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    So the rumours about a vertical takeoff/orbital PAK-FA are true!

    I thought they would use the Energia, but that looks more like the Angara…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2418941
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    I think they still have room for some bombs on the underside…

    I think a Brahmos above each wing would really make it

    Mack – no worries, I think we all goofed on this. Flex was the only one to come out of it with credit 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2418951
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    :D:o

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2418963
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    It will all be downhill once the aircraft is unveiled, because the speculation will turn from good humoured discussion on the shape of the aircraft, date of first flight etc. – to people saying stuff like

    “iz clrly f22 knock off!”

    “oh that tail section looks totally ill designed, i bet sopwith camel is better built”

    “i know guy in CIA, he sez PAK-FA was built on fake f-22 plans sold to kgb and will break apart at 6g… srsly”

    so on and so forth.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2418986
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    I was trying to find a decent image of that and failed!

    I had to laugh earlier, I had the image in my head of the PAK-FA being a Rafale copy with red stars 🙂

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2419022
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    😀

    You are human

    Credit to Flex, I was too gullible at first too

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2419082
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    And on it you can see RAFALE written above !!! looks like a duck , quacks like a duck …

    http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/KHdV6UTlHJ5KLm9ZKt6gkg

    PS: and since when the russians talk in knots???

    :confused:

    You’re looking at what is confirmed and already known to be, a Rafale simulator.

    There are a number of differences between the simulator in those photos and the one we see in the purported PAK-FA picture:

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/errata/notthesamesim.jpg

    And again – look at the flat surface under the front section/windscreen

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/errata/thrustorwhat.jpg

    That’s what interests me

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2419105
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    there is no HUD, It has that “land attack” cockpit of rafale there is Martin-Baker Mark 16F ejection seat. I say it is Rafale simulator. Image is taken from a friendly visit to France.

    Can anyone confirm that there is a Rafale simulator with a sliding canopy?

    I had assumed the PAK-FA would largely share a cockpit/avionics of the SU-35 but based on the pic above that isn’t the case. Althought it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that a bit of espionage has gone on.. and/or a wholly new cockpit was developed.

    Obviously the ejector seat is markedly different to the K-36:
    http://www.photogallery.sandesh.com/cms/uploadimages/Prez-takes-off-in-Sukhoi/25112009_204128593.jpg

    Why the need to develop a new one?

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2419140
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    Check this out , just a simple google search …

    http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/KHdV6UTlHJ5KLm9ZKt6gkg

    http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/3YIzKz8w7aYqeIgs_EkV2g

    :confused:

    I posted that already…

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2419147
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    I’m not saying anything definitively either way – there are distinct differences between what we see and the rafale simulator, I’m just posting the seats for comparisons sake.

    There appears to be greater side to side head restraint on whatever seat he is getting into anyway 🙂

    It is interesting that they share a standard label though

    I’m trying to figure out the yoke we see in the cockpit – is it the thrust lever, or a center stick ala Su-35

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode X #2419157
    shadowpuppet
    Participant

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/errata/ejection.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 144 total)