dark light

scorpion63

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canberra PR.9 belly pod, any ideas? #981974
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Does anyone know what the dome on the belly of this PR.9 held? Photo circa 1982 Hong Kong while the aircraft was used for overflights over China.

    If you want to see what was in the pressure capsule go to the USAF museum hanger at Duxford, one is on its servicing trolley very near a big black thing with long wings!

    in reply to: Equadorian Canberra??? #1020319
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Why not, Equador was a big Canberra operator for many years

    in reply to: Equadorian Canberra??? #1032304
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Why not, Equador was a big Canberra operator for many years

    scorpion63
    Participant

    Back in the early days of Flypast there was a feature on the substantial wreckage of several Gladiators recovered from a lake in Norway by a team from RAF Germany. The wreckage included what looked to be large wing and fuselage sections. The wreckage was stored at either Laarbruch or Bruggen I believe. So what happened to these aircraft when RAF Germany shutdown and where are they now?

    I take it that some of the remains from this cache are being used in the rebuilds being undertaken by the Jet Age Museum and Retro Track and Air? Am I right?

    The forward fuselage of one was at RAF Wildenrath in 1975/6 stored in 60 Sqdns ground equipment hangar, I stripped the engine down and renovated 5 of the cylinders and heads before the whole lot was taken to the Leonides Engine bay for “professional” renovation, I belive it was subsequently scrapped as being of no use, I’ll try and find the picture of the cylinders and post them.

    scorpion63
    Participant

    Back in the early days of Flypast there was a feature on the substantial wreckage of several Gladiators recovered from a lake in Norway by a team from RAF Germany. The wreckage included what looked to be large wing and fuselage sections. The wreckage was stored at either Laarbruch or Bruggen I believe. So what happened to these aircraft when RAF Germany shutdown and where are they now?

    I take it that some of the remains from this cache are being used in the rebuilds being undertaken by the Jet Age Museum and Retro Track and Air? Am I right?

    The forward fuselage of one was at RAF Wildenrath in 1975/6 stored in 60 Sqdns ground equipment hangar, I stripped the engine down and renovated 5 of the cylinders and heads before the whole lot was taken to the Leonides Engine bay for “professional” renovation, I belive it was subsequently scrapped as being of no use, I’ll try and find the picture of the cylinders and post them.

    in reply to: Canberra being made airworthy at Kemble #1040101
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Speaking of WK163 maybe the company that own this Canberra might. Give them an engine because they have a few engines

    If we had “a few engines” WK163 would be flying. Apart from that the PR9 has different engines to all other marks of Canberra, it has more in common with the Lightning in the engine department.

    in reply to: A.M. Ground Camera type S.4 #1080176
    scorpion63
    Participant

    You could try the Joint Services School of Photography at RAF Cosford they have a small museum dedicated to military photography.Now called Defence School of Photography, Part of the Defence Intelligence and Security Centre (DISC). 01902 372393

    in reply to: General Discussion #289972
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Sits with a smug look on his face, being the owner of a ’69 Series2, 2+2 😀

    Also sits with gaze into the darkness as the former owner of this one, lost in a divorce, still, I do get to fly the Canberra when all the engines are fitted!!

    in reply to: Lightning and E-Type #1877508
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Sits with a smug look on his face, being the owner of a ’69 Series2, 2+2 😀

    Also sits with gaze into the darkness as the former owner of this one, lost in a divorce, still, I do get to fly the Canberra when all the engines are fitted!!

    in reply to: Classic Flight Canberras #1046070
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Hi I have been looking at Classic Flights aircraft http://www.classicflightclub.com/browseAircraft and see that they have 2 camberra’s (G-BVWC and G-CDSX) what is their current situation because I havn’t seen them fly or have engine runs in at least 6 years?

    Last time G-BVWC flew was 10 July 2007, Waddington to Coventry, that’s a little less than 6 years ago

    in reply to: Gliding at RAF Swinderby #1069030
    scorpion63
    Participant

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=196462&stc=1&d=1308472696

    T21 Swinderby 1963, also operated a Grunau, a Kranich and several others

    in reply to: Vulcan photos #1071753
    scorpion63
    Participant

    Al – great picture at Luqa – can you date it? I was on the island quite a lot in the late 60s/early 70s and recall Luqa as a busy airfield but never saw the tin triangle there.

    It was taken in 1969, but it was taken for the Sea Vixens, the Vulcan taxiing by was coincidental and a very common visitor at Luqa. Excercise Lime Jug I seem to recall

    in reply to: RAF Gun Camera Film Questions #1122905
    scorpion63
    Participant

    FYI, post WW II, from my Lightnng experiences, Gun Camera magazines would be changed by any engineering tradesman involved in the flight servicing of the ac. Gun cameras were periodically harmonised by the armourers to ensure they pointed where they were needed!

    Gun cameras were always harmonised by armourers AND photographers together, magazines were changed and reloaded by photographers and later ACF’s ( Air Camera Fitters) Lightning recording cameras were usually done by Photogs or Radar fitters as the spine mounted recorder (depending on version) was linked to a bit of radar kit and the cockpit mounted Pilot Attack Sight Recorder was linked to the attack radar via the pilot attack sight. A G90 was also mounted inside the nose intake shock cone lower support on some variants.
    The mix of recording cameras was long and varied as was the position in various aircraft types, worthy of a book of it’s own.

    in reply to: Look closer to home!! #1152635
    scorpion63
    Participant

    At Coventry there are 2 Canberras just sitting there ….now i belive these aircraft once did have a permit to fly in private hands and for some reason ….mainly money i should think are now grounded:(, i love the Lightning just the same as the rest of you but come on if a Canberra cant be kept in the air we stand no chance of keeping a Lightning up there!!!

    The Canberras at Coventry are not “just sitting there” WK163 is waiting for the delivery of a spare engine which has proved very difficult to aquire, when we are certain of a delivery date we can start to service the aircraft which is pointless unless we can get the engine. The two years of external storage have resulted in corrosion which will have to be addressed and with only a small part time team this in itself will take time and a not inconsiderable amount of money. Perhaps instead of bleating about the a temporary grounding you could cough up the £250,000 which Mike Collett has spent on this airframe alone over the last few years, flying old jets is not cheap or easy, we do it because we want to and can.

    in reply to: Mark Hanna's Hunter display #1092161
    scorpion63
    Participant

    How can doing something so wrong look so right?

    I presume it is not really considered acceptable to pop the chute before landing…..:confused:

    Looks even better when a B2 Vulcan does it!!

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 165 total)