dark light

Erez

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,015 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: South- Americian Airforces. #2680083
    Erez
    Participant

    FESTIVAL AEREO 2004 FAE
    GUAYAQUIL-ECUADOR

    Haga click en una imagen para ver ampliaciΓ³n…

    What a sexy little plane, way to go FAE 😎
    Got any more of these pictures by any chance, ecuatoriano? πŸ™‚
    BTW a weird configuration – P3 on one side and P4 on the other 😎

    in reply to: Hizbollah UAV over Jewish Settlements.. #2681785
    Erez
    Participant

    In what sorrow state is the IDF-AF? Erez you know the country-side at Rosh Ha-Nikra and may have traveled the border-road to Lebanon. No much excuses left for the military and it was an ordinary working-day too.

    I completely agree with you. It’s like the MiG-23 in 1989. Heads will be cut off in the IDF/AF.
    About Lebanon – well, you can ask one of the members here, a Lebanese living in Europe (sorry, forgot his name), he’ll tell you how sovereign Lebanon is from the point of view of the common Lebanese.

    in reply to: F-4F Phantom II pics for your viewing pleasure #2681796
    Erez
    Participant

    Nice stick. I have one of my own just like it πŸ˜‰
    Straight from an Israeli AF Kurnass-2000. Now that’s what I call second hand from a pilot πŸ˜€
    (watch out falks, high quality pics)
    http://s6.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=E93F8A555D20D3E6E53E13E0155C5A38
    When that Israeli pilot said that “the Phantom fights you, and you got to really kick the stick to make it turn”, he meant it, and as you can see it’s well kicked:
    http://s6.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=57672D5C5CEA5266F5AF9D2B6B038D73
    Straight from St. Louis:
    http://s6.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=84F297C455A71B29CADC8B2B038E65E7
    How about a USB connection :confused: :
    http://s6.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=BAF4E8EBBC4D77F78F408036E875C809
    And finally, with his brothers in the background:
    http://s6.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=439A7B65AE64DBC3B75EB705DF331692

    in reply to: Hizbollah UAV over Jewish Settlements.. #2681970
    Erez
    Participant

    and I was more generous by callng them disputed instead of Palestinian , As I understand there are still some disputes in those areas on the borders.

    I cant know from that strip wether Nahariya or other towns were there somewhere. SO I guessed it along the border somewhere.

    Nahariya isn’t even along the border. And the territory on which it is built was never Palestinian and the Palestinians have no claim on it. That’s making it even worst, that that UAV managed to go pretty deep into Israel.
    Find a good map of Israel and locate it yourself if you don’t believe me. Oops, I forgot… where you come from, they never heard of the State Of Israel. You better look for a map of “Occupied Palestine” :p

    Nothing that the IDF/AF don’t do almost daily over Lebanon.

    Steve, sadly Lebanon is almost as sovereign as Tibet.
    Until the Syrians will stop keeping a puppets regime there and let terrorists train on Lebanon’s soil, we have no other way but to attack from time to time locations in it.

    in reply to: Australian Army UH-1H crew in trouble. #2682218
    Erez
    Participant

    Were they going to the toilet? “Doing what they had to” sounds like they were going to the toilet.

    If so, yuck. Nothing is more unsexy than a chick taking a dump….

    I couldn’t agree more :dev2:

    in reply to: Hizbollah UAV over Jewish Settlements.. #2682250
    Erez
    Participant

    Flying over “Jewish Settlements”? “disputed terrirtories”?
    Excuse me, how about violating the airspace of the sovereign state of Israel?
    Nahariya is actually one of the bigger cities in Israel. It’s located on the Israeli coast and has absolutely nothing to do with the Israeli Arab conflict. It’s like saying that Tel Aviv is a disputed territory.
    CNN appears to be fed by the Arab media, calling that area “northern occupied Palestine”.

    in reply to: Australian Army UH-1H crew in trouble. #2616811
    Erez
    Participant

    I just got back from the Negev, where something more or less similar happened:
    There was a big drill that morning, that included tanks and helicopters that were firing missiles, so we were adviced to stay in the same place for a few hours.
    While resting, a group of girls went to do what they had to do. A few minutes later, a UH-60 appeared from nowhere, about 20 meters above us and directly where these girls were. I only later realized that the pilots might have “enjoyed the view” :diablo:

    in reply to: Zhuhai '04 unpacked… #2619780
    Erez
    Participant

    No info there :^(

    in reply to: IAI Lavi #2619783
    Erez
    Participant

    Living in a country with military censorship your internal view is limited by national intrests to be polite. Most data and infos about the “Lavi-project” came from companies related to that project and idependent foreign publications. Similar to Merkava, most parts came from those at first. During the development an infrastructure had to built-up to produce those parts domestically. Licences still pay for sharing the production know-how. The whole thing does work only, when built in high numbers and cheap Israeli labour. To achive that high numbers, Lavi had to be exported very fast, to ease the burden of developing.
    None saw the benefit of an Israeli F-16 clone. Where to export with such a high content of US-restricted parts. Israels economy was so weak in the 80s after costly Lebanon war. Israel could not take the offer like Turkey did, to manufacture further purchases of F-16 at home. In my opinion, Israel was lucky by that. No white elephant to keep alive with tax-payers money.
    Have someone an idea, how many licences were taken by China to keep its aviation industry going?!

    I don’t want to get into this discussion again. It’s unrelated to the topic of the thread.
    About the censorship – from the moment the project was cancelled, and even more, throughout the years, most of the information, whether technical or just personal stories, were released.

    in reply to: IAF news and pics Thread : Oct 2004 + #2619997
    Erez
    Participant

    It’s pretty funny, didn’t know the Indians are using “remove before flight” signs, written in hebrew :diablo:

    in reply to: Zhuhai '04 unpacked… #2620003
    Erez
    Participant

    Will the IAI or Elbit (or any other Israeli company) be displaying there?

    in reply to: IAI Lavi #2620008
    Erez
    Participant

    Seems to be you lived not through that times personally. Just wait and see, when the truth will surface about those “national” projects” one day. From first drawings, prototypes to defenite series product, even the external view changes considerably. To miss-use this to confirm, there is no real heritage is …

    It doesn’t matter whether I lived through that time. Most of the information about the Lavi project and the development of the plane was already released, if not all of it.

    in reply to: IAI Lavi #2620179
    Erez
    Participant

    ???
    Edi, don’t you have better things to do other than writing all these unrelated BS?
    Heck, it’s not even related in any rational manner to the quote you added that was written by nani!.
    And what’s with the “influenced” thing?
    The Kfir is based over the Mirage V. Period (why are we talking about it on an ‘Lavi VS J-10’ thread anyway??).
    “Inagruably”? “the flow of F-16 technology for which the Lavi is so dependent”?
    1) That’s your own personal (and IMHO, uneducated) view of the Lavi project. We’ve been through it so many times. One and a half years ago, when I registered to this forum, I did it in order to get into a discussion about the Lavi project. Ever since then I hear people like you talking about how the Lavi is an F-16 variant, and while I always show proofs and evidents it isn’t, the BS celebration goes on.
    2) It’s unrelated in any manner to the original topic, which itself is pretty much pointless as we don’t have enough info about the J-10.

    PS: No offence meant, you are still my favorite forum crazy πŸ˜‰ :diablo:

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2620195
    Erez
    Participant

    There are almost always avionics right after the cockpit.
    For example in the Kfir, when they designed the Kfir TC-2 (two seater), they moved some of the avionics to the nose to clear some room for the extra cockpit.
    However, it’s not very common that a fighter plane’s fuel tanks are right behind the canopy.
    It’s really unknown what exactly the area behind the canopy in the single seat J-10 contains. However, if that’s a fuel spine, why the antenna?

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2620256
    Erez
    Participant

    Mr Erez. It is clearly a spine and probably used for fuel or avionics. Since the two seater has less space for fuel (that is mostly the effect of another seat) they need any space for fuel. The center location is superb. I think if the avionics will get better quality then they will start adding there some decent parts. Sofar it is just a two seater with a small spine.

    Actually, I don’t think that the adding of a second seat caused a dramatic (if any) reduction in the amount of fuel that plane could carry. If anything, I think that the adding of a second seat might have caused a need for some avionics to be moved to a different location. That’s one of the reasons that, IMHO, they created the spine.

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,015 total)