dark light

Erez

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,015 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963571
    Erez
    Participant

    hey girls, what happened to being on topic? I came here to see Russian and Chechen Bashing!! not Israel-Palestinian topics.

    i am very disappointed.. I hope Ariel Sharon eats you all.

    Sorry Big Mac, but I’m gonna have to reply these gents before.

    So history is only interresting when it can be used for own purpuses, but it becomes irrelevant now. Strange You bring up the fact that Jews have always lived in that region. I favour Sharon’s efforts for a roadmap towards peace, eventually these colonies will have to be disbanded because 18-year old conscripts shouldn’t die to protect them. The PA should also get rid of Yasser Arafat, or at least the EU should stop giving money to him. These are the two first steps. I still think peace is possible. In the beginning of the nineties Israel was one of the safest places to live thanks to Oslo-treaty. I can even understand why Israel is building that wall, but the wall should be build fair.

    Interesting, yes. But, again, not relavent to the point I was trying to make, that there is no and never was a state called Palestine.
    I really (really) like your two sided view. You can see that both side aren’t angels and both got to make some moves towards peace. Wish more Europeans were like you.
    About the fence – I’ve already explained about it earlier.

    Oh and Big M – what’s with the Sharon insults? I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t be too happy if anyone started saying such things about Bush. Sharon has a large body and he’s old – but you should read what kind of a hero he was during his military service. That can’t be said about your president, a National Guard pilot, and the president with the lowest IQ ever.

    Member of surfers against sewage, me.
    We all surf, and most of this is crap.

    :confused: 🙁
    Sewage? you mean me?
    Why? 🙁
    I mean, the general discussion forum was made for chating off the aviation topics.

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963611
    Erez
    Participant

    I hope soon and I hope the israeli people vote next time for Peres

    Well, the thing is that today the ideology of both the Left and the Right is very similar when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both say we should make peace, both say we shouldn’t be on Palestinians land, both voted for the Road Map… anyway, it wouldn’t make much difference.
    There is though a bigger chance the Likud will be elected again, probably still led by Ariel Sharon, because of their economic policy and reforms.
    I honor Peres, as the most reliable, experienced and eldest (by age, but this man really got the energies of a teenager…) active politician in Israel, like many others. He should be and he is a leader, yet the opposition for the Likud barely functions, because they got nothing new to offer.

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2652915
    Erez
    Participant

    I don’t know. I do know that they are mostly based in the ‘Top Gun’ base, I believe it’s called “Miramar”. So it’s actually to the Navy as well.

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2652989
    Erez
    Participant

    Yep. BTW there is Kfir C2 and Kfir TC-2 today in the US used by a civil company training the USAF pilots.

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963644
    Erez
    Participant

    This sounds like the words of wisdom. However I doubt that it what the majority of people want in this part of the world.

    Hopefully this will happen some day

    The majority here voted for Sharon, that’s how he became the Prime Minister – and he said that he is commited for the Road Map and his seperation plan. If that won’t happen, we will simply replace him.

    in reply to: NATO AIR MEET 2004 (NAM04) TURKEY. #2653064
    Erez
    Participant

    Cool. Nice to see the Turks and Greeks working together.

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963651
    Erez
    Participant

    Erez, states are an invention of the 19th century, so they are relativelly modern. Before, there were no international conventions regarding the borders. Maybe there was never a Palestinian State, but the state of Israel is also only 56 years old. Even if there have always lived Jews in the region that doesn’t mean that Israel’s right to exist is based upon one single belief! Modern states, like the US, France or Israel, are secular. Today’s Israel is not a continuation of the biblical Israel. The “who was before” game is kind of rediculous because eventually we all came from Africa. People living in Wales today can also claim that they own Belgium because Celts were here long before the Germanic tribes made them move somewhere else. More important than the ethnic ties are the cultural ones.

    Look, I don’t want to take the debate from the main point into irrelavent historical and philosophical questions, and the main point is that I commented on the fact that you guys talk about some dreamland called ‘Palestine’, that doesn’t and never existed. That’s the point, and you seem to understand it, so don’t try now to explain why not having a state doesn’t mean you don’t have a state, or something like that :rolleyes:

    You admit Palestinians have right upon their own territories. So why are you building a wall, which itself I have no problems with, on THEIR land? Why are there colonies in their territories? As I said before, both parties are wrong.

    I don’t – “admit” – anything. No one is guilty, no one is wrong. The fact that the Palestinians were living here for a couple of centuries and got some territories is not something you or I decide. It’s the reality on the ground. Do I like it?
    No. Can I live with that? Yes. Do I have another choice but peace? No.

    You should understand that the security fence is built not as a political fence, and Palestinian territories a few kilometers, meters and so on inside it are still marked as Palestinian on the map. Nobody is making them an integral part of Israel. However, we build this fence how our army think it will protect us the best (and that’s without mentioning our own, Israeli courts, that sometimes make us change the fence because of a Palestinian civilian complains about it), and we build it as self defence – non aggressive move – and until the Palestinian terrorism stops, you should understand that we are just trying to protect ourselves, and that we do it regardless of the needs of the Palestinians (and again, the courts change that sometimes too). And if that Palestinian villiager is angry that part of his land is taken away from him, at least for a while, then he should not cry about it and say ‘the occuping zionists’ bla bla bla, he should say: “We must stop terrorism”, and change something inside them and make terrorism stop, so we can remove that fence.
    For most of the Israelis, the day that security fence will be removed and an international border will be placed between Israel and, hopefully, the Palestinian state, will be a happy day.

    And who was there before this stupid thing that divides man and nations; religion? My point being that maybe there has been a human presence there and yet there is still fighting.
    Give it back to the local wildlife – maybe then there will be peace, of a sort.

    Flood, I never knew you are a Greenpeace activist 😉

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2653120
    Erez
    Participant

    The Kfir has been used in two South American wars in the Falknands the Nesher performance was disappointing becasue the English used the AIM-9L and the Harrier; the Ecuadorian used the Kfir with good results against Peru.
    do you have good links with pictures more than the typical ones find in google or yahoo?

    Flogger, you should differ between the Kfir and the Nesher, they are just not the same plane 🙂
    Anyway, I can send you some really good, new pictures, that ecuatoriano sent me, of the Kfir in Ecuadorian service, but you’ll have to gain his permission first 😉

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963669
    Erez
    Participant

    You don’t go oout of topic.
    What was it before 1948. Who owned this land ? The Brits?

    According to the UN, the british mandate gave the Brits the control over the land. Before the Brits it was the Turks, before that it was Crusaders/Arabs, earlier the Romans, before that the kingdoms Judea and Israel, and before that, a variety of peoples that none survived until today. The only people that always had a presence in the land are actually the Jews. When the Romans came, we were here. When the crusaders came, we were here. When the Arabs came, we were here. When the Turks came, we were here, and when the Brits came we were here. Indeed not all of us, but the important thing is that we always kept a presence here.
    Now again, there was never an Arab Palestinian state. Never. You can always play the ‘who was before’ game, but eventually you’ll see that the people that owned the land first, and still exist today, are the jews.
    But the ‘who was before game’ fails the test of reality, so some territories are rightfully owned by the Palestinians today. That, however, does not mean there was ever an Arab Palestinian state.

    According to Saudi Arabia, Israel doesn’t exist too, does that mean the people there don’t have the right on their territories.

    As I said before, you don’t have to have state in order to have your own territories, so just because the Palestinians have territories, it doesn’t mean they have a state, and therefore the name “Palestine” today has no political, geographical of whatever meaning. It might regain a meaning, when the Palestinians will start walking on the right way towards a state, instead of today’s way, of terrorism. Until that sweet dream happens, the name Palestine means nothing to me.

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2653173
    Erez
    Participant

    BEEP – wrong answer! The correct answer is the Mirage IIING. Canards, LERXes, fly-by-wire. One prototype built, first flight in 1982.

    How many built? oh, just one? well well well.. :rolleyes: 😉 :diablo:
    Ok, so it’s maybe the most Mirage-2000 like Mirage III, but it wasn’t produced and therefore I can’t consider him as real fighter plane, and just like the Lavi, it was a fighter plane prototype, that didn’t go too far as it is.

    I never flew the Kfir. It was the opinion of the pilots from 101. sqn 1975. After that no longer published. Those opinions would hamper export success.
    The same pilots claimed the loss of agility between Mirage IIIC and Nesher.
    The Atar 9C was a little bit shorter and heavier than the Atar 9B. The Nesher longer before engine. (+more fuel = higher wing-load) The pilots described the Nesher as less balanced and nose heavy. Besides such claims the Nesher was very successfull during YKW. We have to differ between flying and fighting qualities.
    The Kfir C1 was the basic Nesher with J-79 modifiacation. The J-79 was shorter and
    heavier than the Atar 9C.
    The tail section of the Kfir was much draggier and consumes much of thrust plus, offered by the J-79. The Atar 9K50 was the better solution for higher thrust and some user took this.
    The problems were known before and aerodynamic devices developed. From the ~50 Kfir C1 assembled/built ( a mix of parts from France, USA and Israel) the last ones were strengthened for rebuilt later to C2.
    The Kfir C2 /TC2 were assembled/built afterwards. C-7 and C-* were not new Kfirs, just modified former C2s.
    The early ones from C1 were reworked to C1+.
    Despite being from the 70s, the Kfir saw no more than 20 years of service, outlived by a great margin from much older F-4s and A-4s.
    Main role was fighter-bomber, just one sqn flew it in the air-superiority role for a while.
    Mainly for marketing purposes.

    Well of course they said that, they were used to the Mirage IIICJ, by no doubt the F-16 of its time, in the IDF/AF. I believe that a more sophisticated fighter with havier weight and weapon load (and adding radar and new engine) will perform less than a Nesher or Mirage IIICJ in dogfights.
    About the claims over the Nesher being unbalanced and nose heavy, the facts from YKW speak for themself.
    The Kfir served for 20 years of active service in Israel, but since the eighties and nineties is operated by other nations, so it’s about 30 years of service by now. Quite a lot for a small, single engined fighter plane, that also gained a large amount of operational flight hours, attacking in Lebanon and Syria, in at least one war. Somewhere in the early 90s, the IDF/AF had two options:
    1) Upgrade the Kfir, using mostly the Lavi’s technology. In a very similar way to how we thought about upgrading the F-4s, there were two plans. One called for upgrading of the avionics, radar, engine replacing and airframe upgrade (Nammer), while second, less costly option called for upgrading of only the avionics and radar (Kfir C10). The IAI started working on these two, but in 1994 the US sent us some ex-USAF F-16s A/Bs, and it was decided to stop the Kfir’s active service, and replacing the last Kfirs with the ‘new’ F-16s. However – some of the improvements of the Kfir-2000 and the Nammer found their way to the Israeli Kfir C7s in 1992, like the wrap around wind shield, and the IAI carried on with the development of the Kfir-2000 (and possibly the Nammer for South Africa as the Cheetah C, I don’t know for sure), that eventually took off and sold.
    Again, why should we operate the Kfir as an interceptor, when we got today’s best air superiority fighter, the F-15?
    When it was designed (or, redesigned) in the IAI, they thought the US will no permit selling of F-15s to Israel. The IDF/AF came with a demand for a multi role fighter plane, mostly interceptor, for the 70s and 80s. Then the F-15 came, and later the F-16, but the Kfir remained as a striker, and damn good at that too. And today, the Kfir C2 ,C7 or C10, are providing a cost effective solution, whether of older tech (C2), better tech (C7), or state of the art (C10), for many countries that want a good fighter bomber that can also counter fighter planes like the MiG-21, MiG-23 and alike, that their enemys are using, and doing it by also combining state of the art missiles, including the Python-4.
    For conclusion, I believe that the best slogan for sellings of the Kfir is:
    Kfir – The Wise, Cost Effective Solution :dev2:

    in reply to: Let's try again: Russian school siege part deux #1963758
    Erez
    Participant

    I’m sorry for entering your debate here, but some members mentioned some country called ‘Palestine’. Can you please point it on the map? I can’t seem to find it.
    Seriously, some people here are living in delusion. There is no Palestinian state. And the Palestinian terrorists don’t help the Palestinian people to get one anytime soon.
    There are Palestinian owned territories, yes. But not a state, so far.
    Let’s have some history review over the name Palestine:
    Judea being destroyed by the Romans, somewhere in the 1st century. Then the Romans call Jerusalem “Ilia Capitolina” and Judea is renamed after the Philistine people, that once settled the land of Knaan, before the hebrews. None of these people survived to the time of the Romans, but that’s how they called it. From that on Crusaders and Arabs came and left the land, and the Roman word “Philistine” turned into “Palestine” in Arab. The last time the name Palestine was an official name of a place was in the early 20th century when the British ruled here, and even then the official name was “Palestine-Land of Israel”. In 1948 the state of Israel was formed.
    To conclude it, there was never an Arab Palestinian state. They do have some rights on some of the land today, but you can’t call it “Palestine”.
    The official name is “The Palestinian Authority”.
    Sorry for going somewhat off topic.

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2653685
    Erez
    Participant

    The introducion of “Canards” saved the Kfir, from being a costly failure.

    Please base that statement.
    I think it’s wrong. The Kfir C1 didn’t have canards, and was still a better aircraft than the Mirage IIIs and Neshers we had, so for us it wasn’t a failure.

    Thank you Erez how did the Kfir get canards? do you know kfir the roll rates and turn rates? in South america the Ecuadorians and Colombians are quit happy abou their Kfir CEs and Brazil was pondering if to purchase it as an interim fighter, Argentina used the Nesher in the Falkland war and still they are proud of them, i feel the Kfir is the the best Mirage type ever in Venezuela their Mirages NG upgraded are quit similar to the IAI Kfirs, Chile based it`s Pantera on the Kfir with AIA help, South Africa did the same with the Cheetah

    I guess the smart falks of the IAI thought: ‘hmm, I wonder how can we improve the Kfir’s performances…’ and then designed the canards :dev2:
    I don’t know the exact performances of the plane, and rarely saw it flying in Israel (was too young and too far away fron the Negev, where they were last operated), and it might not say anything, but the Kfir’s turn rate and expecially roll rate seemed very impressive on “Iron Eagle” :diablo:
    About the Kfir being the best Mirage ever, it depends. It’s true if you want to ask “what is the ultimate development of the Mirage III/V series?”
    The answer is the Kfir C10.

    in reply to: Israeli Superweapon? #2057766
    Erez
    Participant

    Hamburger, I know you aren’t an antisemite, but it seems like this picture has antisemitism in it. It’s not just Sharon that fires, but the star of david that sybolizes the Jewish nation and make it look like a symbol of the devil.
    That’s pretty insulting.

    in reply to: IAI Kfir History #2653987
    Erez
    Participant

    If I’m not mistake it means Lion cub…..

    Correct.

    This Mossad action is often referred as a masterpiece in secret service history but infact the mission was a piece of cake. Mossad only succeeded because of silent permission of Marcel Dassault itself who pulled the ties so that all doors were open for them. Dassault (Marcel Bloch) is finally a Jew in origin and this was the way how to support Israelis even with valid embargo of Charles de Gaulle who was interested in better relationships with Arabs.

    Finally, the production plans for Mirage V, that’s simply tons of paper, this is nothing you could pick in you pocket and walk, you need several trucks to load those…

    I agree with this theory. Production plans aren’t a 3 view diagram of a plane, but a specific information and data on each part of the plane.
    BTW, it was officialy published that technical co operation between the IAI and Dassault continued even after the embargo, when the IAI needed a few tips about the Arye (they wanted to help but said “sorry, the kind of plane you want is simply can’t be built”). You don’t work with someone that stole one of your designs just a few years before. You work with someone you know you gave him these designs.

    in reply to: Ofeq-6's Launch Failed #2057776
    Erez
    Participant

    How could I forgot. The Ofeq 5 or 6 are better. The Europeans do that business for decades. Hubble is a K-11 looking into the opposite direction. No helping hand from ESA to Israel direct or indirect, scientists from Israel working there too. For Pakistan it was enough to built its own atomic weapons. When the Mossad has to tell the public, where most infos come from?!. The YKW showed that the Israeli view of things to come was wrong. Iraq the similar situation, when it comes to WMD.
    The Kennedy admin. (1961-63) could not prevent Israeli becoming a nuclear-power. Pakistan is the first islamic nuclear-power and will not be the last to come. Oil will not last for ever and nuclear power-station will reappear in many countries. If we like it or not.

    I didn’t say the Ofeqs are better or not, just don’t take us for fools.

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,015 total)