God damnit GD…
I’m not racist. I said I don’t know what the Chinese are capable of, since I don’t know, and mentioned that the Chinese industry produced mostly Russian designes and developments of Russian designs until now.
Is that wrong or what?:confused:
WTF????
GD, I don’t claim anything about the Chinese people, just on the J-10! Did I ever said anything about the Chinese except of facts? NEVER EVER!:mad:
Come on, you don’t really think that the Israeli government would approve that kind of thing?
They won’t, and it’s part of our security policy for ages, not just about the J-10, but on any weapons sale that is not approved by the US and it should.
Golden Dragon, for the last time.
As far as I know, Israel has assisted in the development of the J-10 to a certain extent. As far as I believe, the J-10 is a development of the Lavi.
Don’t agree? So shoot me!
Anyhow, there are billion Chinese. I don’t know what are they capable of, but history shows that most of the aircraft the Chinese industry produced are either Russian designs or a development of ones.
It will not be as surprising as you think if it will turn out to be true that the J-10 was designed based on the Lavi.
For now, I can’t prove it because I still don’t have solid proves, so we can argue about it, but we cannot argue about such simple things as a PS job of a Lavi drawing. As you see I haven’t said one word about the real J-10 and the real Lavi is this thread, just about that damn drawing.
But don’t call me racist. Rasicm killed half of my family.
It was probably based on a F-16 unless the sneaky Israelis had actually backstabbed the US by selling the Lavi to China while they lied out of the side of their mouths when they said they’ve haven’t.
For the last time. The Lavi was designed years before Israel had access to the F-16.
Erez’s “original” drawing of the Lavi was also Chinese.
Actually, the author wrote next to the wing in what looks like greek.
It was probably based on a F-16 unless the sneaky Israelis had actually backstabbed the US by selling the Lavi to China while they lied out of the side of their mouths when they said they’ve haven’t.
Shut up:mad:
I don’t know who do you think you are, but just shut the **** up. You can’t just say this kind of things and get a way with that.
Who let all the idiots in?
I don’t know, maybe we should have an I.Q test for new users.
Erez, I hope you would rest ypur case now and stop shouting phosotshoped Levi pictures.
it’s Lavi, you unalphabetic a$$hole.
Anytime some idiot decides to Photoshop Lavi pictures or drawing, I’ll be there.
This is the Lavi drawing in full scale and better quality.
One thing the artist does no capture well is the fact that J-1o’s main wings are connected to the lower surface of the fuselage, while the Lavi to the middle. Furthermore, the he/she did not capture the “inverse seagull” configuration of the wing. There should be more blending with the fuselage at the middle of the wings. And the J-10’s ventral stabilizers should be longer and thinner than the Lavi’s
Not really. It just that the wings of the Lavi are blending better with the intake, otherwise it’s on the same spot.
In spite of Israel vehemently denying it, Erez knows those sneaky Jews would be selling stuff to the Chinese so they could backstab the Americans every chance they get
IGNORING.
I am shocked that he has claimed FTC-2000’s nose looks like Kfir
WTF?:confused:
That’s the original drawing. When I first saw that so called J-10B drawing I was shocked and sad to see how people are twisting the truth. Just like those pictures of the Lavi from 1986-7 that are said to be J-10.
I’ll also try to find the website I got it from because I had to reduce its quality in order to upload it here.
That’s an extremely modified picture of a YF-23.
Jtms, the picture you uploaded is a modified drawing of the Lavi. I have the original.
The IAI Phalcon AEW conversion on a Boeing 707-385C of the Chilean Air Force.
Yep;)
Arthur, it’s Sufa or Suefa, not Tzufa.
The Atalef should be reopened in about 2006 as a Sufa squadron, as far as my cousin knows. He was a technician there as you know. He actually got a disk like everyone alse in the squadron, that says that “The Atalef will be open in *** 2006 in a great Storm” (Sufa). Believe it if you like.
The recon job will be taken by another aircraft, which was tested in Manat. Since I (again) can’t say what it is until the Air Force will publish it, I’ll leave to your imagination.
Adi, in these pictures it has a general shape of a regular IF-16D.
I’d like to recommend you all a book I’m reading right now. It’s about Iran and the US. its name is “Shadows of Steel” by Dale Brown. It’s a very good book and and related to what we are talking about here.
Nice. Too bad they didn’t put on these CFTs… they made it look like a regular IF-16D…
Don’t you think it looks like a…?:D
Just kidding.
Good work as always.
Why didn’t you conncet the wings to the fuselage?