from the pictures it looks like they’re making a domestic copy of it.
Hellfire-L missiles could in theory have such a capability if the guidance radar is able to paint multiple targets.
the upcoming “hermes” missiles from russia could introduce such a capability… but in reality few people seem to discuss the issue of multiple target attack with a single aircraft / helicopter. The idea that you can hit the first target… then fire the second missile afterwards … wait for time of flight … then acquire next target is silly for many types of targets since the element of surprise is lost once the first target is hit.
I’d have thought this issue would be one of the key points in new rocket / missile guidance developments. there’s no reason why you couldn’t incorporate multiple laser guidance units into a single aircraft which can be independently steered allowing the operator to designate multiple targets and fire against them in a salvo with each missile having a separate guidance beam… it would make a quantum leap in precision targetting efficiency against multiple targets and reduce the exposure of the firing aircraft to return fire if they can scoot as soon as the missiles hit (all together).
This is the issue that has been plaguing Iraqis for the past year. They’ve tried all manner of these small laser guided rockets right up to hellfires all have the same issue. As I know the only solution is the use of small gps guided munitions. Laser guided munitions are thus obsolete for multi target simultaneous engagement.
The sortie rate was pretty high from.Iraq and it was mostly within 50km of the iranian border. Missions deeprrnintoniran were lless of course. Just the border guard pc7 planes were patrolling along the entire border in over 40 sorties a day… Forget about the mig21 which flew most sortieS. Iraq did indeed fly hundreds of thousands of sorties into Iran. And the F14 did in fact not shoot them down as proven by the remaining in tact airframes iraq had in 1990. Where are all the shot down airframes? Who flew them? How come those planes were still in iraqi inventory 2 years after the war if they were shot down?
As for iraq destruction Of iran. Well each plane dropped an average of 500kg or less per mission. Missions reaching reaching 1000kg were rare indeed. And usually 1/2 of planes dropped ordnance. So for 200k missions there were 100k planes dropping ordnance… Totalling about 50k tonnes of ordnance. That was peanuts compared to what iraqi artillery was doing… They’d drop 50k tonnes on Iran in a couple of months… Not 8 years.
yes. no doubt. the best fighter interceptor of the iran iraq war was the F14A. It however never performed adequately due to many factors including lack of AWACS support, low operational availability etc…
Iraqis only claimed about 5-6 F14s as shot down in air combat anyway.
ultimately the fact that Iraqi planes flew in and out of Iran for 8 years, conducting hundreds of thousands of combat sorties and losing less than 200 planes in the process is a testament to that. Similarly, iranian F4 phantoms could fly into Baghdad even in 1987 despite there being a large air defence umbrella and interceptors and a MiG25 squadron around… both sides chaffed under a lack of AWACS platform which meant that it was exceedingly easy for either side to sneak in hilly terrain along the border and be detected too late for effective interception.
Lets not forget that by March 1988 the Iraqis were flying Il-76 heavy freighters INTO IRAN and dropping “pallet bombs” (with no loss)! This in addition to the lumbering medium bombers that flew into Iran on many hundreds of missions over 8 years (TU22, Tu-16 and B6D) and suffered a less than 1% attrition rate… despite these being “ideal” targets for the F14 / Phoenix combo.
In reality the “most effective” interceptor for both sides was the short-medium altitude SAMs, due to the inherent weakness of both sides air operations and control capability. I am surprised Iran has not bothered to upgrade its capability after the war… but it seems they took their experience from teh war to focus more on having nimble mobile forces and lots of independent capable and highly mobile ground based air defence systems…
Iran’s post-war action (focusing on building up alternative forces and de-centralised air defence and rocket based attack) shows that the overall experience of using “us style” air supremacy simply didn’t work out. The fact that the air force was left to soldier on with whatever they had and without much more investment in air capability over the past 25 years is a testament to that.
Similarly the Iraqis “attempted” in the 1988-1990 period to “upgrade” their air operations shortcomings with the expensive project consisting of three aircraft:
-Baghdad 1 “ground mapping and control” aircraft series
-Adnan-2 “AEW & C” aircraft series
-Boeing 727 “Airborne Command Post” series
demonstrating aptly that they were not impressed by the capability of their air interception and attack capability during the war…
Iraq lost 23 aircraft in the air during 1991. and that’s to a far superior enemy.
I can’t look up the exact figures for MiG25 losses, but they were pretty small. I believe there were 2-3 fighter versions lost of which one was in an accident. leaving a possibility of 1-2 to be shot down. 1x MiG25RB was also shot down by a SAM.
Similarly Iran lost 19 F14 airframes between 1980-1990 (and that EXCLUDES pre-war accidental losses). i.e. they had 77 airframes in 1980 and in 1990 had 58 airframes (of which about 20-25 air worth at a time).
Let us repeat that in 1980 Iran had over 300+ BVR capable modern fighter jets.
Iraq had…. 0!
Its only in 1982 that Iraq began fielding BVR capable fighters in numbers (Mirage F1, MiG23ML, MiG25PDS). So the Iraqis managed to fight the entire period of the “most intense” part of the air war with ZERO BVR fighters versus 300+ Iranian BVR fighters… and they didn’t lose air superiority. Not bad… and mostly due to the effect of Iraq’s better organised ground based air defence system than anything else.
What the Iran Iraq war truly demonstrated is that against a 2nd level country, a soviet-style (but mixed eastern-western) air defence system can hold its own and be pretty resilient. This experience then took the Iraqis onto their disasterous experience in 1991…
The problem for you is that now we know how many planes iraq lost in total from iraqi archives and iraqi officers. Rendering the wild claims from earlier tom cooper books obsolete (relying 100% on iranian claims then trying to “match” iraqi figures around the iranian claims to make them fit).
The total fixed wing Aircraft losses do not exceed 170 For all causes. And Iraqis admit to losing only about 25 or less to air combat (and only claim a few iranian jets in air combat too… Ceding most claims to air defence sams).
I can see that the erroneous wild claims by cooper and bishop are still plastered on every Wikipedia page and thus the myth goes on.
Well this is parliament bluster at this point. Abadi is in Washington to discuss arming the iraqi armed forces so it’s no coincidence 😉
The Defence and Security Parliamentary committee of the Iraqi Parliament has made an official request in the parliament to begin the procedure to demand the refunding of the F16 IQ payments due to the non-delivery of the aircraft and thus non-compliance to the contract by the US side.
some more old iraqi trainers…
Very nice!
How many Tucanos did Iraq actually operate? The number published through the 1980s was “80+” but I think that was based on the number of CKD kits supplied to Egypt; not sure how many of those were actually assembled.
88 Tucano were supplied to Iraq. They were operated exclusively by the Air Academy in Tikrit until 2003. All pilots in Iraq trained first on AS-202 Bravo (48 supplied) then on the Tucano planes before moving onto L39 (80 supplied) and then MiG21UM / F7B for “advanced training”.
The PC7 (52 supplied) and PC9 (20 supplied) by contrast seemed to be mostly as FAC / COIN planes.
This has nothing to do with Iraq. Iraqi AF commander already said last month that money from the L159 and MiG29M were diverted to fund emergency supplies of “sukhois” (I presume SU-25). The latest news is that the Czech Government has approved the sale of these aircraft to Aero and onwards to Iraq….
Now why they would write that is a mystery… perhaps they went back and offered the planes again to the Iraqis? Made a new deal? who knows. the Iraqi Air Force is a complete mess… by contrast to the army aviation.
Iraqi Mi35M and IA-407 “tag team” in Tikrit last week.
Iraqi Mi28Ne with mast mounted radars.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235793[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]235794[/ATTACH]
B52 is the best CAS.