dark light

sheytanelkebir

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What is in the F/A-50? the other golden eagle #2217302
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    the FA-50 was supposedly meant to be a combat capable twin seater jet, not a LIFT..the T-50 could easily fulfil the role of a LIFT even without a radar in its nose. And with an Elta 2032 in its nose and with 3500+ kg payload capacity, in both areas it compares very favourably with the JF-17.

    The only question is why isn’t it being fully exploited by integrating more weapons and pods to it? It doesn’t need to be a F-16 to get an LDP, LGBs, an ARM and an AShM integrated. Other light fighters like the Gripen already have these, and the LCA will get these integrated.

    An HMD with the AIM-9X would make it a dangerous opponent in close combat.

    in addition to what Tonny said… I suspect that LM / KAI created a “light fighter platform” and ordnance can be integrated as per the customer’s wishes… that way they offload some of that development / testing cost onto paying customers rather than privately fund it up front.

    So lets say the Iraqi AF asks for certain items to be integrated… the Iraqis pay for that integration, but afterwards KAI can advertise that “capability” to other potential customers without having to have taken any funding risk. So surely if the Philippines wants Anti Ship missiles or BVR aams, they would fund that integration… and then KAI can sell it on to other customers later. $$

    in reply to: What is in the F/A-50? the other golden eagle #2217407
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    its a LIFT / light fighter. not an F16. If one compares it to other aircraft in its category, its good. However if you want to go “one notch up” and it doesn’t compare favourably against JF17 in terms of payload variety / sensors (it does however have 3x the airframe life of a JF17).

    in reply to: Iraq takes the Russian appraoch to battling ISIS #2218883
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    it is a hoax. spread by iranian media.

    in reply to: Il-76 "bomber" trial, any others? #2224314
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    Iraqi Air Force used Il76 as a bomber against Iran and their Iraqi Peshmarga allies in the battles in the spring of 1988. Areas inside Iran and along the Iraqi border were bombed.

    They employed “simple” barrel bombing technique.

    Iraq enjoyed air supremacy in the area, and no Il76s were lost.

    in reply to: Iraq takes the Russian appraoch to battling ISIS #2224870
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    Tank 1 was mobility destroyed then incinerated last summer in ramadi.

    In the video you posted. The tank is part of a joint army and popular mobilisation column going to attack isis near haditha. That column was supported by us airpower too. Every abrams tank is owned operated and controlled by the 9th division iraqi army and us contractors accompany and maintain tanks in the field. There are no tanks in the possession of militias. They do however operate with tanks of the army and take pics with them and out flags on thenm for local propaganda.

    in reply to: Iraq takes the Russian appraoch to battling ISIS #2225033
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    I don´t know about air assets but ground assets I saw a lot. Lots of M1 tanks ended in ISIS hands and US had to destroy them. Iraq already lost half of its M1 tanks and ordered another 140.

    Zero abrams tanks were captured in tact by isis. They did destroy 10 or so. In a year of fighting. If you have evidence for any more I’d love to hear about it. Certainly the us did not destroy a single abrams tank. Once again if you have evidence to the contrary I’d love to hear it.

    But surely unreliable units manned by sunni Arabs and kurds turned coat in June 2014 and handed over their weapons and equipment to isis (sunni Arabs) and peshmerga (kurds). But the only “major asset” lost was a battalion of m198 guns that was shared about equally between isis and the kurds. Asbyou well realise “loyal units” of the iraqi army did not collapse and stopped the isis and peshmerga ddrive… Right about where those groups have popular support. Otherwise surely isis would be in control of baghdad karbala najaf nasiriya basra and the other provinces… Curiously the “collapsed iraqi army” did not collapse there.

    in reply to: Iraq takes the Russian appraoch to battling ISIS #2225166
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    so much wishful thinking.
    how long will all these equipment end up in the hands of ISIS again?

    Remind me how many aircraft and helicopters have ended up in isis hands before, in order for there to be an “again”?

    in reply to: L-159 Alca #2226002
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    you forgot weight. 😉

    in reply to: L-159 Alca #2226261
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    sad to see that the L159 seems cursed not to be sold. Would have been a nice little jet for us IMHO.

    in reply to: L-159 Alca #2226341
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    As I said “excelent” idea to make a deal with Iraq, as I said…

    I am happy that all stored Alcas will go in country of the Uncle Sam, to real business and technical partner, not to absolutely unfaithful eclectic collector of weapons from around the World…

    I’m glad that you’re finally satisfied.

    The funds from the L159 purchase were diverted to two things.

    1- Additional funding for base preparation for the new air academy and the T50IQ project
    2- Additional funding for the “sukhoi” project

    This development comes in line with other “realignments” including Iraq stopping payments for the F16IQ project and diverting those funds for more “Sukhois”.

    in reply to: radar, AAM vs ground, moving targets #2226768
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    The proximity fuze will detonate the warhead as the missile nears the ground, possibly making it ineffective against a ground target.

    aren’t proximity fuses adjustable though?

    in reply to: radar, AAM vs ground, moving targets #2226779
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    I believe its mostly a software limitation.

    certainly if the aircraft’s computer can be programmed with an additional mode to use air to air missiles whilst the radar is in ISAR / ground mapping mode. there’s practically no reason why you couldn’t do that. But I am guessing most countries don’t want to even think of wasting precious air to air missiles on targets for which more suitable weapons are available… and thus customers are unlikely to pay a few million dollars to reprogram their computers in order to be able to launch air to air missiles against surface targets.

    in reply to: Iraq takes the Russian appraoch to battling ISIS #2226870
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    Iraq receives another shipment of Mi28Ne helicopters.

    Commander of the Army Aviaiton Command in this video outlines three interesting facts.

    1- The new helicopters were delivered with Radars and new weapons to enable them to fight at night more effectively.

    2- The new helicopters will enter testing this week and enter service in March.

    3- In 2 days another shipment of Mi28Ne will be received, concluding the delivery of the current batch.

    PS. he also mentioned the delivery of new Bell 407s…

    in reply to: Iraq takes the Russian appraoch to battling ISIS #2228047
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    1. I’m not sure the L159T was a turnkey solution, so it probably had too much lead time to introduction.

    they were negotiating for 15 second hand units. not new builds.

    2. Any specifics here?

    Yes. They deferred a $1.5Bn payment that was planned for 2015 for the F16IQ programme.

    3. No number of Su-25’s is going to secure their airspace

    No F16 IQ (armed with 40 year old sparrows) would secure it either. Perhaps SU30 would have a better chance.

    4. T-50IQ should help train F-16IQ pilots immediately, but otherwise is not that much tactical help.

    They will be delivered near year end. Both for attack as well as advanced training.

    5. Pretty useless IMHO.

    Why? They need every airframe they can get right now and the Super Tucanos are pretty ok for use on the desert regions IMHO where you have small outposts who desperately need air support. As for the Mirages… well the Iraqi MOD held some meetings with French MOD officials to discuss french “support” for Iraq only last week. Lets see if France offers some assistance in operating the Mirage 2000-9s.

    6. I believe they this made the decision mid-summer of 2014

    Yes. And now they confirmed more helicopter purchase from Russia as well as more “Sukhois” and munitions for them.

    7. With drop in oil prices this has to hurt Russia.X

    Yes it will hurt Russia somewhat in the short term. But it seems Russians made a strategic decision on this. Similarly the US, Kuwait, UAE are all delivering weapons for free to Iraq too, and the US is also discussing potential for “deferred payments” for some future weapons purchases to speed up delivery.

    in reply to: Iraq takes the Russian appraoch to battling ISIS #2228149
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    further to this…

    Confirmation from the Iraqi MOD:

    1- that they stopped the purchase of any L159s from Czech Republic.

    2- They have agreed with the US on delaying further payments for the F16IQ

    3- Funds have been reallocated to buy “sukhois” and large volumes of munitions.

    4- They have speeded up the work on the T50-IQ with South Korea (they were originally scheduled for January 2016 delivery)

    5- There is also unconfirmed news about the UAE donating 6x Super Tucanos and 10x Mirage-2000-9s to Iraq

    6- Iraqi Army aviation also finally confirmed without a shadow of a doubt that they will not buy Apaches or AT6C texans and that Orders with Russia will be increased.

    7- Russia has agreed to sell Iraq weapons with deferred payments.

    So that’s the “state of play” as of now.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 768 total)