a nice little flypast…
which is strange since the Commander of the Iraqi Army Aviation actually categorically said “these helicopters will be equipped with radars with a range of over 20km to find targets in all weather, day and night”… and this he said before the above photo surfaced (i.e. when the first 3 helos were delivered).
Iraq’s second batch of Mi28Ne do have the mast mounted radars… so the Russians and other potential operators will certainly have them (including Algeria at a minimum).
http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/bmpd/38024980/1685300/1685300_original.jpg
whether such a radar gives any “useful” air to air detection capability to allow for anti-helicopter / anti-drone operations to be carried out effectively remains to be seen however.
Tornado GR4 armed with Brimstone certainly does have that capability.
but is a pretty expensive solution with low time on station?
Really an AC-130 … like some people have suggested would be great with a 105mm howitzer and a 30mm backup as well as some brimstone type of thing to round things out. 3-4 of these flying around the vast desert / valleys would keep the IS terrorists on their toes.
Iraq should have bought Ka-52, which is already flying with a full defensive suit and with DIRCM.
Buying Mi-28 without even MAWS is just stupid. I have been wondering why VVS itself is doing that, when the Mi-28 has flown with MAWS, as seen on the export show bird.
Sheytan how many sorties have Mi-35s flown?
I believe Iraq is still looking to get KA-52s, but we don’t know when though.
The Mi35M and Mi28Ne don’t currently have any MAWS etc… but even US made MAWS on the IA-407 helicopter didn’t help deflect the FN-6 SAM… and that’s probably because they only use flares and not a DIRCM perhaps the Iraqis and Russians will now fit a Russian MAWS/DIRCM system to see its effectiveness?
The Mi35Ms have flown about 3000 combat missions since they entered service at the beginning of the year. 2 have been lost since then, both shot down by MANPADs. But they undertake the most dangerous missions currently in Iraq, and so losses should be taken in that light.
Iraqi and Syrian helo crews better hope that those were their only FN-6 MANPADS.
Any change that Qatar has delivered FN-6’s directly to IS? Syrian rebels had less than ten and it’s suspicious that now IS has used FN-6 two times. I guess it’s a possibility that Chinese have sold MANPADS to Iraqi and Syrian governments and no one has been reported about it… IS conquered many bases in both countries and you just never know.
Iraqi Army certainly does not possess a single FN-6.
All the FN-6 that are operated by ISIS are from China->Sudan->Qatar->syrian terrorists->ISIS
in terms of what is needed to fight ISIS?
What you need is a long loiter aircraft carrying dozens of guided and unguided munitions that can be targeted SIMULTANEOUSLY at multiple moving targets. That is what’s needed.
Currently the aircraft / helicopters employed by Iraq (and coallition I guess) have the ability to target only ONE target at a time… meaning that there is a “shot to shot” delay of at least 40 seconds between targets. Once the first vehicle in a bunch of vehicles is hit, they disperse, abandon vehicles etc…
What is needed is an ability to target multiple vehicles SIMULTANEOUSLY. That is the key capability that’s missing now.
Also there needs to be a clear “no mans land” drawn up separating “safe Iraq” from “ISIS” in order to simplify Rules of Engagement for the forces.
Back on track, I think the A-10 and Su-25 are the right planes to use, if the other side hasn’t got access to good manpads. If they do these planes are going to suffer.
IS have shot down 2 Iraqi helicopters with FN-6 MANPADS. one of the helicopters (an IA-407 scout) was fitted with AAR-47 MAWS and automated flare dispenser. The other helicopter (Mi35M was not fitted with MAWS).
I know rumcajs. its so disappointing to sell these planes for a higher price and get service contracts for Czech companies and staff. It would have been so much better if the Americans paid 1/8 of the price and not give any service contracts for czech firms. :confused:
the Iraqis will get 15 L159s:
10x single seaters (flying)
2x dual seaters (flying)
3x single seaters broken up for spares.
Aero is paying $36M for the jets from the czech air force.
I wonder how much Iraq is paying aero?
I would say “rumours” have included Iraq buying 7-8 second hand helos from Greece!
maybe AB205s ?
yes, although the pakistanis have been rather keen on marketing it to the Iraqis. I’d expect saudi to pop in and say I’ll give you double the money for not sending it to Iraq… (like what qatar and saudi tried to scuttle the Iraqi-Russian deal in 2012).
However I’d expect the Chinese directly to give short shrift to any saudi/qatari bribery attempt… and there has actually been rumours of Iraq buying some JH-7 second hand from the Chinese?? anyway… just a rumour for now.
according to the Iraqi AF commander they have the following deals for fighter aircraft:
US for F16IQ
Korea for T50IQ (FA50)
Czech for L159
Russia for “second hand sukhois” (SU25)
Russia for “new” aircraft
China for “aircraft”
make of that what you will.
But there’s already lots of noise coming out regarding the F16IQ deal.
The US want the Iraqis to pay up front for the various $1Bn+ infrastructure and support contracts they signed last winter (see a few pages back)… the Iraqis are saying… no deliver the first F16s (that we’ve already paid for), then we’ll continue sending payments for the “infrastructure and support” contracts.
The americans want the iraqis to send more money so they have them over a barrel (without having delivered any aircraft), the Iraqis, for obvious reasons, aren’t going to fall for it so easily.
Anyway, they can take that $1Bn over to the People’s Republic of China and see what they can get for it (the US was offering a couple of hangars, and some US “security contractors” and a couple of dozen maintenance techs for $1bn…) I’m sure the chinese can “beat” that deal quite easily… maybe a couple of squadrons of JF17s with full equipment and ground support… that they can probably begin delivering “quite soon”?
Thus… despite everything that’s ongoing in Iraq and despite the reassurance of the Air Force Commander, there’s rumblings about “asking for a refund” if the US doesn’t deliver the first jets on time…
fingers crossed that the US honors its liabilities and does send the money back! though i am not hopeful. we may have to bite the bullet and cut our losses sadly 🙁 anyway, its not the worst loss we’ve had over the past decade… sadly.
If they’d improved the cockpit layout to improve the visibility of both pilot and gunner… maybe have the “gunner” in the front section with rotating seat to be able to look forward as well as back?
it would have been an “interesting” LAAR type aircraft if it had a 6-8 hour endurance and had on board ISAR / FLIR etc (operated by the second crewman)… with those 14 hardpoints! 😀
There was an interview with the Iraqi AF commander and he did say that the deal with Czech is still on.
it does not have the warning system from the latest russian version… will they fit it in Iraq with the US An-AAR47s that are fitted to Iraq’s Mi17/171s?
appolagies if this is discussed elsewhere, but what is this about Iraq buying 6 Su-30K’s and giving them to Iran?
it was a “made up” thing. The only things confirmed by Iraq are:
-Iran returning some of the Iraqi jets. (no mention of numbers) – importantly this does NOT constitute an “arms purchase” by Iraq from Iran… its simply a “return” of ex-iraqi aircraft as opposed to say buying second hand F5s or Cobras from Iran.
-Russia and Belarus delivering second hand jets to Iraq (once again, types and quantities are only confirmed by MOD when these are delivered! don’t listen to what various “iraqi media” make up along the way… the only “true” info is from mod.mil.iq)
I suspect the SU-30K to Iran is a bit of “artistic licence” by Pro-Iran fanboys. But lets wait and see… stranger things have happened.