dark light

sheytanelkebir

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    they all got pensions, but at the time (1991-92) most did not have their kill claims recognised until a few years later. whether they got their “bonus” for the kill later on in hte mid 90s or not I don’t know.

    relatives were all ground personel except for one who was a crew on BK117 helo (prior to that allouete)

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 11 #2300883
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    I always found the choice of Il76 strange for AWACS work, a converted airliner would have been a better choice IMHO… but the Il76 seems to be popular with everyone for AWACS and a whole load of other things.

    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    that’s a random mix you have there 😀

    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    my father in law served at H3 for 6 years. no underground HAS there. there were lots of americans there after 2003… any pics or mention of these uber underground shelters?

    they didn’t exist.

    there were some underground shelters for people (very “shallow” ones, 1-2 meters deep, more like a basement), some “partially buried” ammunition depots… (semi buried mainly for temperature reasons).

    there were also a few proper “underground” centres… sector operations commands and air defence operations command. these were indeed destroyed by the american “bunker busters” and resulted in the deaths of dozens of high ranking officers in 1991.

    but all that talk of masses of underground HAS, “tunnels under baghdad” etc… were all complete and utter nonsense.

    the only place with lots of tunnels in Iraq in fact is the “old town” of Najaf 😉 bet you never heard of it. http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jTjr2xdxbTQ-fWOB9EpF7hz7r4WQ

    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    i was in imam ali AB (tallil AB in western parlance) 8 months ago, no underground uber HAS there… LOL. I’ve never been to Al Qadisiya AB which was the most modern “new” airbase built in Iraq in the late 1980s… it is possible they had carved some HAS out of the side of the limestone hills around the airbase… but AFAIK no such thing existed even in Al Qaddisiya AB (Al Assad AB in western parlance). The MiG25s all operated from large overground HAS in Tammuz AB, nothing “spectacular” about them.

    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    sayhood retired after the 1991 war (along with a huge number of other pilots as the air force and army aviation and army were massively downsized in light of the defeat and destruction of most of their aircraft on the ground).

    I had several relatives in the air force and army aviation… all were sent to retirement after 1991, so sayhood’s situation was not strange at all.

    iraqi documents on the war are from the “presidential secretariat archives” not from “baghdad bob’s book of propaganda”. in fact the Iraqis showed that the destruction from the air was actually far worse than even the US planners imagined… e.g. Iraq lost 5 SU-24s on the ground destroyed… the americans didn’t think they destroyed any of those.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2301727
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    nice choice for indonesia… I am guessing in a few years they’ll get a few SU35s to round it out too… great upgrade path to 4+++ gen. without losing your shirt on “vapour ware” 5th gen stuff.

    in reply to: IRIAF F-14AM Upgrade #2301759
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    I would have thought a better upgrade would be to try and get some more modern Chinese radar plus some PL12 “copies” (since importing actual missiles is not allowed anymore). AWG-9s are really long in the tooth by now… and even swapping out some of the analogue electronics for digital stuff can only do so much to improve ECCM / resolution / scan speed / modes and “reliability”!

    in reply to: MiG-25 vs F-4 in Iran-Iraq war #2301805
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    it was a politically oriented attack, since H3 did not have any of the strategic aircraft the Iranians claimed… All the planes (MiG25s, Tupolev 16, Tupolev 22 etc… they claim to have “destroyed” were in Tammuz AB… reachable by F4 phantoms from Iran without aerial refueling… yet the airbase was never attacked).

    Shuaiba air base or qalat sukar AB were within 40km of the Iranian border and operated several combat squadrons day by day…

    the aim may have been to force the iraqis to beef up their defences on the west thereby weakening their position in the east facing Iran… but Iraq’s robust reply to syria (and shooting down syrian planes near the border) detered the syrians from allowing any more such “direct” adventures… from then on the proxy war between the iraqi and syrian baath parties was played out bloodily in lebanon…

    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    just a few corrections.

    1- iraqi Mig25s were not based out of H3 “al waleed” but from Tammuz AB (“al taqaddum” in western parlance).

    2- Iraqis did not have underground HAS. the only facilities underground were the Air Defence Operations Command HQ and Sector Operations Command HQs. There were some “semi buried” ammunition storage areas.

    3-H3 did not have dozens of fighters and bombers etc… it was a combat training base for the air force in the 1980s. the associated small bases around it were all simple dispersal fields. sometimes 2 interceptors would be based out of there for QRA covering ingress from israel/syria. but that was about the extent of combat aircraft based there during the intensive combat period of the iran war. Chinese F7s as well as some twin seater MiG21UM were based there, all used for combat training. Jordanian Instructor pilots were based there as well as some Jordanian I-HAWK unit and they did lots of joint training with Jordanian F5s flying out of H4 Jordan.

    do note that the above info refers to the period 1980-1988… at other periods different types operated out of H3.. but it was not a main operating base and did not have a “permanent” combat squadrons flying out of it.

    in reply to: MiG-25 vs F-4 in Iran-Iraq war #2302016
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    at the time Iraq and Syria were already near a state of war… and iraqi planes also shot down intruding syrian aircraft around this period. the syrians/iranians afterwards resorted to “joint” acts like this http://www.nytimes.com/1981/12/16/world/bomb-wrecks-iraqi-embassy-in-beirut.html which you can also consider to be acts of war… but in practice neither the iraqis nor syrians opened a new “front”.

    this was part of the iranian effort to open a new front… but the syrians were soon busy with matters closer to the heartland, a breakdown in lebanon, uprising in hamaa etc… and Iraq could ill afford to open a second front… as if the first one wasn’t big enough already!

    AFAIK the iranian planes travelled to syria by shadowing iranian airliners along civilian flight routes i.e. overflying turkey.

    lots of small stuff like this happened throughout the war… there was even a case of an Iraqi MiG25RB landing in UAE 😀 and although iran attacked gulf shipping regularly, it didnt cause an “open war” with the GCC states, nor did the Iraqi AF shooting down the plane of the algerian foreign minister cause a war either…

    in reply to: Canada's Mi-17V-5 (CH-178) #2302476
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    great helo… you know they would love to buy it officially but can’t because its “russian” 😀

    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    actually Thobbes the last Air To Air incident involves a MiG25PDS shooting down a Predator… I am guessing this presages the world of manned vs unmanned aircraft…

    there’s lots of air combat potential in the near future IMHO… but usually involving one or both sides who are “underdogs”.

    A new conflict similar to the Georgia war on Russia’s edge… A war in the middle east (could involve plenty of actors), skirmishes between Bangladesh and Myanmar ? lots of potential… maybe even skirmishes between PRC and some of the “neighbours” with whom it has land / maritime disputes… vietnam, philipines. japan etc… and the biggie of course USA vs Iran.

    in reply to: MiG-25 vs F-4 in Iran-Iraq war #2303081
    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    Iraq did claim that (and by then relations between Iraq-Syria deteriorated massively, other attacks Iraq blamed on syria were the terrorist attack on the iraqi embassy in beirut, and Iraq was arming the lebanese christian militias against syria etc…).

    also Iraq shot down some Syrian planes intruding into Iraq during this period too. AFAIK the “attack” was done by a couple of F4s of which one was shot down on egress, no damage was done to the airbase. It was half baked attempt by Iran to open a “second front” against Iraq… it didn’t go far as the syrians backed out quickly, having been kept busy by what’s happening in lebanon.

    but the incident itself was just a small “incursion” and the Iraqis at the time didn’t make a huge fuss about it as it was hardly an important “attack”… they had no idea that some salt and spice would be added to this skirmish 30 years later and published as some sort of massive daring raid in the english language 😀 especially not on an outlying operational training / logistics base. In fact when I asked my father in law about this some years ago, it took him a bit of time to recollect the events (and called up some of his old colleagues first to remember it, as it was not a major attack, more of a buzzing fly by by the 2 F4s when the AAA opened up they immediately turned around and flew away, one being hit on egress – major “political” incident at the time, but hardly an important military one)… when I showed him what was published by iranians about it, he cracked up laughing.

    anyway, regarding F4 vs MiG25 combat, AFAIK there was probably no air to air incidents involving these 2, except for maybe an RF4E being shot down by MiG25PDS. The Iraqi MiG25RBS were invariably engaged by Iranian F14s or I-HAWK SAMs.

    sheytanelkebir
    Participant

    any kill credited to an “SA-2” should be taken with a pinch of salt. Iraqi post war analysis demonstrated that the SA-2s didn’t shoot down a single aircraft (despite Iraq using up 95% + of all its S75s!! during the war)

    In total the Iraqis should have shot down about 37-40 planes plus another 20+ damaged. Most of this was done with SHORADs (OSA, ROLAND, IGLA, STRELA-10) which was quite good. But Iraq’s medium-high altitude SAMs (S75, S125, KUB) were woefully inadequate by 1991 and for higher altitude intercept Iraqis had to rely on manned aircraft mostly (exception being a few upgraded S125s). In Iraq AAA was used to keep attacking pilots busy avoiding flak and missing their targets and not as a serious effort to shoot down enemy aircraft. only cruise missiles / target drones / RPVs were credited to AAA. though the americans seem to have credited a whole load of things to AAA… probably due to all the “distraction AAA” in the air that the Iraqis used… the Iraqis considered the AAA to have been partially effective in disrupting up to 40% of PGM attacks as well as a large % of cruise missiles… but since the US used so much, it was all ultimately futile anyway.

    there is only one claim the Iraqis made that doesn’t agree with the US claims… and that is a B52 which the US said crashed due to mechanical problems but Iraqis claim it was hit by a MiG29.

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 768 total)