I don’t think the americans were hunting down old Iraqi pilots after 2003. They had bigger fish to fry. The Iranians did indeed have lists with hundreds of pilots names and at least 200 Iraqi pilots were indeed killed, and subsequently most then escaped to jordan/syria/yemen etc… in fact iraqi mercenary pilots flew in quite a few places after 1992 already, including yemen and some african countries… so the exodus of fighter pilots began already before 2003.
Passing kills off as accidents doesn’t seem to be done. There’s no gain in it.
propaganda use during wartime… keep up morale etc… it does happen and has happened.
Truth is Iraq got pummelled and most of it’s airforce was blown up on the tarmac.
agreed… in fact the truth is the Iraqi Air Force was destroyed on the ground much more severely than the US had estimated itself… which is what drove saddam to make the decision to evacuate some remaining frontline aircraft to Iran.
here’s a list of official losses from 1991… http://iraqimilitary.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=71
compare to losses from 8 years of war to Iran!
They bagged a single F/A-18 (which from memory got passed off as SAM kill because info wasn’t known).
actually Iraqis also got several more air to air kills… but its a moot point in the “grand scheme”… they could not stop the US from destroying Iraq’s entire civilian infrastructure (bridges, power stations, factories, railway yards) which in the end was the biggest cause in the rapid capitulation of the Iraqis (order to withdraw from kuwait, and chased by the USAF/Army from behind and destroyed).
And that’s the truth in war – so often it’s an unknown.
but some are unwilling to accept the opposing perspective unless it matches 100% their own wartime propaganda narrative… which is silly.
I think for airforces thinking of getting a new “low cost” multi-role combat aircraft in… the JF17 or A-50 would be high up the list… the refurbished planes don’t seem to be worth the hassle vs these newer simple airframes.
yes of course… whilst the US team were looking to recover gun camera footage from a shot down MiG29 (hardly of much importance in the grand scheme of things at that time, and such footage is usually burned out completely anyway), they never seem to have found their shot down pilots and planes in the deserts of southern Iraq (wasn’t that F18 pilot “missing” for donkeys years?)… strange that… risking SF teams to verify some geezers’ “kill claim” instead of using them for something more important… 😀 honestly. how gullible are they believing such nonsense?
no one has a shot with the MiG29 HUD instrumentation showing by any chance?
this is a real shootdown btw…
They would have passed it off as an “accident” had it not been for the video.
i am guessing they came up with these whacky things to get funding to keep themselves in cushty jobs. Don’t forget the “thing” is supposed to impress some turbaned quran-reading old men… who are most likely to be impressed. 😀 reality is usually a much more “mundane” thing… even in “strange exotic” places.
I guess you’re right Mack8. there’s no point hitting my head against a brick wall.
yes that was the HUD shot from a MiG29 getting whacked. The Iraqi pilots were a bunch of incompetent cowards and the only thing stopping the brave well trained US pilots from killing them all is that the cowardly iraqis decided to run instead of fight. [/end history of 1991 gulf war]
that image is not from any Iraqi MiG29 “HUD recorder”. You served or not is irrelevant. It is incredulous that such lies continue to be blindly believed by americans just because “they” came up with the lie. Iraqi WMDs in 2003 anyone? a US team in the iraqi desert “recovering” a HUD camera film… that would not survive the impact / fire… and the FDR which would survive does not record the video from the HUD/Gun Camera… all of that from an SF team “operating behind enemy lines”… come on. even the brits gave up with the old “SAS antics” from the war… its long over, no need for the propaganda anymore.
US claimed to have destroyed 40 Iraqi planes in the air. It was factually INCORRECT. You can call it “Iraqi revisionism” “arab untermensch liars” or whatever else, but the Iraqis KNOW what they lost far better than you do. The idea that the US doesn’t lie or overclaim is simply a continuation of the overt superiority complex demonstrated by flag waving americans… incapable of accepting revisions to their wartime propaganda figures… even 20+ years after the end of a war that no one disputes that they won! incredible.
the “narrative” of the war until now was written 100% from US/allied perspective with 0% input from the Iraqi side… Iraqi figures and views help to “balance” things and clarify and correct matters from the fog of war… but for some, its better to keep up the old myths of ubermenschen vs untermenschen.
looks nice and clean. but in this day and age its a bit long in the tooth.
Russia and China are the core of the SCO and cooperate strategically and economically on many levels… I don’t see what the issue is. I am guessing that the Chinese are buying the small number of SU35s as interim types until they get the J20/J31 operational, and they didn’t buy into the T50 because of India obviously… I’d expect they may end up buying another batch eventually as inevitable snags in the J20/WS15 come up.
I just wish our lot would have bought a few :(… anyone knows what the unit cost came to for these SU35s?
Digging undersea & very deep tunnels isn’t easy to do secretly. They’d have to dispose of millions of tons of spoil. Nor would it be easy to conceal the exits. S. Korea is a densely populated country, & the border zone is closely watched. Digging deep costs more (& no, they don’t have unlimited labour: half the population of the south, & a lot worse fed), & even the deepest tunnel is shallow when it approaches the surface.
its mad but its doable… for a tunnel similar to the latest ones discovered along the DMZ (2m x 2m)… stretching over 40km under the sea with multiple entrances and multiple exits at either end would be about 2m x 2m x 40,000m = 160,000m3 … specific gravity of the rocks around that area about 2.9….. so about 470,000 tonnes of rock to get rid off over a construction period of 15 years… or about 31k tonnes of waste rock in one year… about 2 heavy truck loads per day. if you conceal your entrance near a mine, it can be disguised as quite normal activity even to other mine workers… almost no one need know about it. then you build dozens of entrances from different locations to the main trunk… but since that’s geographically dispersed it can be hidden easily.
on the southern side you dig to the “last 50 meters” for each of the dozens of exits and on “D-Day” blast your way out… in the middle of gangnam 😀
rise of the underworld.
if the “peace” continues for some more years… you can continue extending the deep main trunk until you reach Osan airbase… so much for air supremacy when DPRK hommies stuff claymores into the F15s…
In Hollywood maybe.
South Korea is aware of the tunnels.
One hundred thousand troops through tunnels.
One or two air-strikes and the tunnels are gone along with anyone in them.
SK surely knows about the tunnels the DPRK dug in the 1980s… straight down under the DMZ.
what if the DPRK has spent the last 20 years digging tunnels going under the sea and into the south? and spent the last few years quietly stockpiling light weapons and explosives in some caves / dugouts in SK… what DPRK doesn’t lack is manpower to dig these deep tunnels… as well as time to do the work. they could have some “main tunnels” with multiple entry and exit points at each end for redundancy…
now all of a sudden the “job” of destroying the tunnels becomes a whole new ballgame.
presumably the DPRK is aware of the above… and are thus only maintaining the air bases full of obsolete aircraft and army bases and artillery dug outs with decrepit guns as diversions against their “real” attack… light infantry infiltrations, IEDs, RPGs and light mortars carried by SF to hit US/SK airbases from behind… they would dress them up in SK clothes to create chaos “behind the lines”… and if they used 100,000 of these SF troopers behind korean lines (most in civvies or SK clothing) pandemonium would break out and a swift collapse of the SK internal security. All it will take is lots of US soldiers shooting SK civilians and soldiers by mistake (in fear that they are infiltrators) for trust to break down between the SK/US troopers on the ground (of little consequence, but if some SK troopers open up firefights with US soldiers when the US soldiers shoot at them… relations can quickly deteriorate). Also expect lots of SK troopers shooting their own approaching civilians thinking they’re infiltrators as well as IEDs by the roadside disrupting all the military convoys to the front as well as supplies to airbases… 100,000 SF behind lines is about 12,000 individual cells… each can carry out 1-2 operations per day that is an enormous number of attacks they can carry out in a short space of time… I wonder if the DPRK have now dug their tunnels across the DMZ so deep as to reduce their detectability (logging resolution decreases with depth / type of rock). they would be able to flood out thousands of their men and materials across the tunnels and the war becomes a battle of whether the SK internal security collapses before the DPRK conventional force or not…
I am guessing that the DPRK is aiming to make use of their behind the lines Sf as a potent psych-ops… the “conventional” soldiers in their dugouts will have to bear the brunt of the US/SK arty/air onslaught up until each US/SK airbase falls to the rear line infiltrators.
Its certainly
for the past 20 years the DPRK have been accutely aware of their shortcomings in high tech weapons and have devised necessary strategies to nullify their disadvantages. However so far only the most loyal DPRK soldiers have been used in cross-border raids, so its impossible to know if the morale of the average soldier is as extremely high as the average infiltrator type.
They will definitely have some surprises in store for the south if a war were to break out… but it won’t be in tanks, artillery or aircraft. The key unknown would be the morale of the “average” DPRK trooper in such a war. Something that probably not even the DPRK leadership themselves can be sure of 100%
Western, Asian Arms Suppliers Target Cash-rich Qatar
Looks like France (and others) is trying to sell quite a bit of equipment to Quatar along with the Rafale.
A 20b pie that should make things quite interesting…
I would have thought that Dassault should do a widely publicised offer of Rafales to Iraq in order to get the GCC to “bite”… they’re desperate to stop any high tech weapons deals to Iraq and would sign on the dotted line immediately to stop the Iraqis getting the aircraft. Perhaps dassault can pay a small commission to the Iraqis for their effort afterwards :dev2:
they have woeful Situational Awareness, outdated armaments and decrepit aircraft. vs south korea which is a very very high tech air force.
they would be a walk over, and they know it.