dark light

xanadu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 326 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gripen to Pakistan? #2687004
    xanadu
    Participant

    PAF top amongst the Muslim world?

    Not unless the UAE, Saudi, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria with its soon to be SMTs etc do not count as Muslim countries!

    I do not think that anyone denies that PAF pilots did a good job in past wars, problem was that it did not end up in winning the war and today good or bad, they just do not have the aircraft to face the IAF and are reduced into buying second hand Mirages, not even M2Ks, from Lybia.

    ————————————————————————————-

    Point noted Sameer – but then the UAE and Saudi relyon mercenary pilots. Anyway its just a sad state of affairs for the PAF and they are not going to be able to do anything about it anytime soon. As someone mentioned if they buy something the Indians will just go ahead and make another 100 aircraft purchase and restore the imbalance, they have the money to do that. The PAF has to realise that – no way are the Indians going to allow them a level playing field.

    in reply to: Gripen to Pakistan? #2687684
    xanadu
    Participant

    Well this place is still good for a few laughs :p :p :p :p

    GD no doubt the PAF was a good airforce and is the top amongst the Muslim world but the deterioration is massive. Unlike it the IAF is on a massive modernation drive.As someone mentioned the IAF stopped bothering about the PAF a long time ago. They know that the PAF has been reduced to a purely defensive force and dosent have much of an offensive capability. What offensive capability it has can be taken care quite easily. What the IAF is more concerned with is the PLAAF.

    in reply to: LFI or MCA #2669769
    xanadu
    Participant

    http://in.rediff.com/news/2004/jun/05drdo.htm

    DRDO to develop new fighter aircraft

    June 05, 2004 00:39 IST

    The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has initiated talks with the Indian Air Force to design and develop a Medium Combat Aircraft (MCA), a fifth generation fighter plane.

    “We have started drawing (designing) the next generation Light Combat Aircraft, which we call as Medium Combat Aircraft (MCA). We are in a dialogue with the users (IAF) to find out their design specifications,” Scientific Adviser to the Defence Minister and DRDO Director General V K Aatre told reporters in Bangalore on Friday.

    “Sooner or later, perhaps, in a decade or so, we should build our own twin engine aircraft,” he said.

    The single-engine Light Combat Aircraft, called Tejas, is a delta-winged, tailless, fly-by-wire, supersonic fourth generation fighter under development by the Bangalore-based Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA).

    The fifth generation fighter will be powered by two indigenous thrust vector Kaveri engines and is likely to have stealth capability. The Kaveri engines, developed for the LCA, are under developmental trials.

    As of now, the prototypes of the LCA, which are undergoing test flights, are powered by American GE 404 engines.

    in reply to: MiG-29SMTs, Yemen & "huge" MiG contracts #2696612
    xanadu
    Participant

    Hey Harry is that in Indian skies?

    in reply to: Indian Medium Multi Role combat competition article #2649667
    xanadu
    Participant

    India has already finalised the acquisition of 10 Mirage-2000-V jets from Qatar, which wants to sell them off. But the French proposal is to sell 18 Mirage-2000-Vs off-the-shelf to IAF, followed by licensed production of 108 in India.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Interesting news about the Qatari Mirages. Any confirmation of the deal being done? I thought that there was no deal being considered by Qatar in the first place.

    ————————————————————————————

    I think the 10 refered to are the ones purchased as attrition reserves and which were rumoured to come from Ex- Jordanian stock. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Indian Medium Multi Role combat competition article #2649674
    xanadu
    Participant

    troung

    Its IAF and not InAf:mad: 😡 😡 😡

    in reply to: F-16 v/s SU-30 MKI #2651268
    xanadu
    Participant

    Originally posted by SabreAce
    This topic is BS. Xanadu, you’re an idiot for thinking that an F-16 compares with an Su-30MKI.
    ——————————————————————————

    Never said that it compares. Just wondered whether it could put up a fight against the MKI or whether its just a waste for Pakistan to get it.
    Hmmm come to think it would be better to compare the Mirage 2000-5 v v/s the F-16 seeing that both are still in the if stage. but the n again I think the Mirage would be more for the attack role :rolleyes:

    ————————————————–
    Xana… Xana… Can’t stop repeating propaganda based in inferiority complex. One… It hasn’t said it is going to give F16 and two it will not give high tech. But probably some posters are ****ing in their pants with just the imagination.
    ————————————————————————

    Inferiority complex??????????? hahaha Just hope that the Pak’s get some decent hardware sometime soon if not the next the the two meet its going to be pretty onesided. Yea yea we heard that one Pak pilot is equal to 50 from India :rolleyes:
    N my point was not so much to grudge the Paks some puny F-16’s but to make a point about us double standards. Remeber how the US backed Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war? Then suddenly he became enemy no one for them . The US has a habit of supporting tinpot dictatorships to suit their needs and they claim to be such gr8 defenders of democracy HUH!!!

    in reply to: General Discussion #378253
    xanadu
    Participant

    Well like Imran Khan said to the PCCB chief towards the end of the match- “Get us an Irfan Pathan”. Its not how fast you bowl the ball but where u bowl it. Speed isnt everything. The Pakistani bowlers are good – really good and any team would love to have them. But they need to get back to basics.

    Well India won WOPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!;) 😉 😀 🙂 😉 😉 😉

    in reply to: Cricket Pakistan India 2-1 #1964250
    xanadu
    Participant

    Well like Imran Khan said to the PCCB chief towards the end of the match- “Get us an Irfan Pathan”. Its not how fast you bowl the ball but where u bowl it. Speed isnt everything. The Pakistani bowlers are good – really good and any team would love to have them. But they need to get back to basics.

    Well India won WOPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!;) 😉 😀 🙂 😉 😉 😉

    in reply to: An interesting question from PakistanDefense: #2663578
    xanadu
    Participant

    😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

    Looks like the board has finally taken effect and fried everyones brains in here .:p

    😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀

    in reply to: IAF's Hawk Trainer delay #2666882
    xanadu
    Participant

    AJT deal in a day or two: Officials

    http://in.rediff.com/news/2004/mar/12ajts.htm

    Josy Joseph in New Delhi | March 12, 2004 15:12 IST

    India and Britain are set to sign the $1.7 billion Advanced Jet Trainer deal, senior government officials said on Friday.

    Also Read

    Special: The arms race

    The AJT and other recent deals will make the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government’s spending on defence procurements the highest in Indian history and could make it a contender for the title of the world’s biggest buyer of defence items.

    According to defence ministry officials, the AJT negotiations have almost been concluded and the deal could be signed in the next day or two.

    “We are through [with the negotiations],” a source close to the deal said.

    Under the deal, the Indian Air Force will get 24 Advanced Jet Trainers manufactured at British Aerospace facilities in the UK. Another batch of 42 AJTs will be produced at the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited facility in India.

    After the Cabinet Committee on Security cleared the deal with BAE Systems on September 30, 2003, a new hurdle over accounting cropped up, delaying the signing of the agreement.

    Officials say the defence ministry’s failure to correctly work out the cost of setting up HAL facilities for indigenous production of AJTs have now been overcome.

    The AJT is among the various multi-billion dollar defence purchases sanctioned by the Vajpayee government. Sources say since payments for these deals are spread over a few years India could technically claim to have not spent the most this year on defence purchases.

    But that is just a technicality.

    On January 17, the Cabinet cleared the Rs 2,800 crore (Rs 28 billion) deal for the Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier. Though it is denied officially, sources say the government has already cleared a deal to lease Russian nuclear submarines and Tupolov-22 long-range strategic bombers along with the Gorshkov.

    India has also finalised a $1.5 billion deal for the purchase and transfer of technology for Scorpene submarines from France.

    In coming days, the Indian Army will select a supplier for new generation howitzers that are currently being tested. This deal is expected to be worth around $1.5 billion.

    India is also pushing to get the Arrow ballistic missile defence system from Israel.

    In 2001, India had signed a $2 billion contract for military technology transfer from Israel, including assistance in MiG-21 upgrades. The country is finalising almost two dozen items for its special forces from Israel. Almost an equal number of equipment for the special forces is being procured from the US.

    In 2000-2001 India spent Rs 120 billion on defence purchases. In 2001-2002, it spent Rs 162 billion and in 2002-03 the defence budget was hiked 14 percent.

    According to a senior defence ministry official, the government will spend some $100 billion over the next 20 years if the present strategy is carried forward.

    in reply to: News INAF. #2675246
    xanadu
    Participant

    well dont get that technical 😛

    in reply to: News INAF. #2675284
    xanadu
    Participant

    The Astra BVR missile has already undertaken its first tests. What is not clear is what its range is going to be. Anyone have any clear idea?

    in reply to: News INAF. #2676348
    xanadu
    Participant

    Then they are pretty useless aint they. Y did they even bother to offer the f-16’s.

    in reply to: News INAF. #2676534
    xanadu
    Participant

    If hypothetically one removes the threat of sanctions- how good a buy is the f-16 for the IAF from the Mirage-2005-v and the russian competition keeping in mind that all the aircraft in the competation are old designs.
    In what way would the f-16 score over them.

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 326 total)