Any reason for not including NW, 33 Sqdn?

P&P, ref your #41. The machine represented would have been Gloster built. It must be make believe. Very poor for a place like Duxford. I have never seen G1 or 40H before. A CCF connection? I doubt it very much and certainly not for that early production machine.

Alas no. I have the feeling that many/most of today’s flyers are only fitted with the external plywood panel by the aerial mast and not the internals. The exception might be R4118.

That long panel is in the order of 3 inches wide, your piece looks wider. The tube to the left of it is round and made of steel. The only place I can think of with that kind of thickness of ply but I don’t know about extent (and I don’t know the entire structure of the Hurricane) is in parts of the radiator fairing.

Tangmere1940, the ‘accent’ over the name could well be the dot of an ‘i’, as in the word ‘bei’. That said such captions should be treated with caution.
Try squadrons with a second letter U. Not that many: DU, JU, OU, WU and maybe FU & AU. The upstroke of the letter closest to the roundel has a deceptive curve level with the centre of the roundel to give the impression of an O or D, but that apparent curve is probably the result of damage. If a ‘proper’ curve in the lettering then it would make a very small O or D and be quite disproportionate to the size of the roundel and the G. That then opens the possibility for a letter U (or even J) in addition to O and D which remain just as valid.

Looking for Hurricane part for restoration of P3708:
Stainless steel stiffener attached to each end of the centre section front spar. Rear side needed, which differs visually from the front side primarily by the four small bolt holes around the top larger hole – see photo. Part number B74460. Does not need to be a perfect example, although that would be preferable. Similar condition to that in the photo might do.

[ATTACH=CONFIG]255051[/ATTACH]

Different aircraft to N3200.
1. The QV marking on Mark12’s photo doesn’t extend far enough down to the ‘opposite curvature’ of the wing fillet. See photos below.
2. The camouflage colour boundary on ‘Mark12’s’ port wing is for the opposite scheme to N3200.
3. The curvature of the bent prop is different, although it could be a different blade as the various photos of N3200 on the beach do show the prop in different positions of rotation.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]254455[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]254456[/ATTACH]