dark light

mike currill

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 9,892 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1135763
    mike currill
    Participant

    Just had a trawl through my paperwork to check that I wasn’t talking a load of cobblers and I was correct. One thing it definitely isn’t is the Avions Mignet HM-1000 Balerit. Talking of which does anyone know if it ever made it to production as all I’ve seen is a flight test of the prototype and that was about 8 or more years ago?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1131846
    mike currill
    Participant

    I believe that the HM-1000 Balerit went into production but not the HM-1100 Cordouan. The manufacturer’s website says that the Cordouan was never certificated because it was unable to demonstrate its recovery from a spin because it was impossible to spin the aircraft! Anyhow what I presume to be the sole HM-1100 is currently for sale – see http://www.pa-ulm.com/affiche.asp?req=rech&motclef=mignet – if you happen to have 45 000 Euros to spare!

    I can’t believe the stupidity of some people/organisations. If the aircraft cannot be persuaded to spin why is a spin recovery demonstaration required to certify it? You cannot demonstrate recovery from a condition the aircraft cannot get into in the first place.

    in reply to: Seafire question… #1131850
    mike currill
    Participant

    I didn’t think that Mk Vs used the individual exhaust stubs. All the Mk Vs I have seen or seen pictures off had the siamesed exhausts as per the Mk II

    in reply to: Seafire question… #1131523
    mike currill
    Participant

    Thanks guys you’ve improved my knowledge and now given me another one. I thought gun heating was electric not off the exhaust

    in reply to: Surviving Seafires #1131539
    mike currill
    Participant

    There is one Seafire currently on the UK airshow circuit, I can’t remember who owns it but I believe it actually served in wartime though I may be wrong as usual.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1130555
    mike currill
    Participant

    Lends a whole new meaning to the term ‘Built in headwind.’

    in reply to: Seafire question… #1130562
    mike currill
    Participant

    Thanks guys. Isn’t it amazing what you can learn if you stay here long enough? I am always amazed by the wealth of knowledge on this forum and just how quickly a query gets answered. I can’t even get questions about nwork answered that quickly by the company I work for.

    in reply to: Any Chance Of A Shackleton Returning To The Sky? #1126323
    mike currill
    Participant

    [QUOTE=Kenneth;1523801

    The DC-6 is a certified aircraft, the Shackleton isn’t. A paperwork difference, perhaps, but an important one.[/QUOTE]
    The paper work for getting the Shack approved for UK ops would be a major exercise in itself I imagine.

    in reply to: Boeing Stratocruiser Landing Attitude #1126337
    mike currill
    Participant

    VC-10s do appear nose down on landing, but they definately touch down on their main gears first.
    Must admit I thought Britannias did aswel.

    I have often wondered about the Strats landing attitude, which seems more pronounced than the ’29 and ’50.

    As the VC10 sit quite nose down on the ground they will land mains first even if the aircraft is horizontal so I guess the reason they land normally is to take advantage of aerodynamic braking. Let’s face it with something that size you need all the help you can get, well I certainly would anyway.

    in reply to: RNHF news #1123671
    mike currill
    Participant

    I hope so as she is sadly missed when she is absent.

    in reply to: Duxford IWM #1123575
    mike currill
    Participant

    And hope the ‘bus service’ is running back as it’s a long walk

    It’s not a long walk. I’m over 60 and I find it easy enough, I guess a youngster might find it a bit of a trek though. I started taking my two at about 5 also and now the youngest is my regular companion at legends. Unfortunately I only seem to manage the one airshow a year these days unless I manage to make it to Abingdon as well. Really must make the effort to get back to OW this season.

    in reply to: TWO 'Butcher Birds' on the British airshow circuit? #1122745
    mike currill
    Participant

    Care to elaborate for us lesser mortals who have lost the ability to read minds

    I think he’s referring to Tom Blair’s recently sold example (rumoured to to be staying in Europe) and Christophe Jaquard’s example possibly appearing together. I would love to see it.

    in reply to: TWO 'Butcher Birds' on the British airshow circuit? #1122636
    mike currill
    Participant

    I think that is what our young friend means. Now that the ex-Tom Blair one is out of the way of the Campaign Against Aviation we may get to see a pair flying together at Legends.
    Having seen its performance last year I have to say that it would be twice as good to see a pair together in the air rather than just on the ground.

    in reply to: Civilian Repair Units #1122637
    mike currill
    Participant

    My father was Technical Advisor to the CRU and is very reticent on this subject. I would like to find out more about what the role involved and where he moght have been based. He does mention a few places such as Brize Norton. What is or where is Bristol Bowfighter? Can any one be of help?

    If he worked under Lord Nuffield I can understand it as by all accounts he was not an easy person to work for.

    in reply to: Spotted #1122698
    mike currill
    Participant

    Obviously an IFR pilot (I follow roads)

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 9,892 total)