dark light

mike currill

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 9,871 through 9,885 (of 9,892 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dual Engine Failure #401717
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by Moggy C
    Oh, you really have opened a can of worms there Ewen.

    Presuming you meant the risk of any one engine failing is doubled you are correct.

    However the consequences are by no means halved.

    On the few general aviation light twins with a respectable engine-out performance, and with a pilot who is very current on his engine failure routine and assuming that it doesn’t happen below the blue line the consequences are likely to be much reduced in severity compared to a single. ie a controlled landing on a runway of choice as opposed to a forced landing in the best available field for a single.

    But if ANY of the above conditions are not met then the consequences are far, far worse. An off-airfield landing in a faster, heavier aircraft that does not have the bulk of an engine directly in front of the pilot, but rather has a great lump on each wing to drag the lightly protected cockpit through any handy trees etc, is not something to contemplate with any degree of sanguinity.

    Moggy
    Lapsed twin driver

    Garry, I suggest you reread the above and take note of this, as Moggy says the risk of engine failure is doubled it has to be as you have twice as many engines to quit on you and the bit I really think Moggy should have underlined ist that if the pilot is defficient in any one of his required conditions a crash is nigh on inevitable and one thing he didn’t say is that even with some of the most modern twins performance is so poor with an engine out that there’s a damn good chance the live engine will just fly you to the scene of the crash

    in reply to: L39 forced lands near Duxford – ‘pilot uninjured’ #2097437
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by A330Crazy
    Glad to see the pilot escaped without injury. That BBC article is pathetic, I dont mean to be horrible but the Firefly crash is in the past, why drag it up? If it were me writing that article I would try to concentrate on the matter in hand.

    Media always has a tendency to keep dragging up the past!

    G-OTAF:
    http://www.caa.co.uk/srg/aircraft_register/GImages/g-otaf001.jpg

    Why do the media always drag up the past instead of simply reporting the facts and leaving speculation out. If they waited till the AAIB published their findings there would be no scope for speculation but, as was pointed out earlier both crew members got out safely so no sensational story to help sell the paper. Anyway the so called aviation experts who report for the papers usually know nothing more about aviation than which end of an aircraft is the front

    in reply to: C152 Formation Flying #401798
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by SteveYoung
    Whiskey Delta – nice one! 152’s are nice and docile to learn in, but I’d be petrified at the prospect of getting into close formation work in one. Great bit of flying there, well done.

    We do indeed, and I have to say I enjoy these shows more than I do the big ones. The display at Little Gransden (this years is on 31st August – shameless plug!) has a bit of eveything; last year ranged from a trio of Turbulents doing flour bombing and balloon bursting to a Mustang pairs display. A C152 formation pass would have been a perfect addition to the display.

    Mike – I don’t know where you’re located but in my neck of the woods (East Anglia) these smaller events are surprisingly frequent. FlyPast Fly-in at North Weald next weekend, Rougham Air Display near Bury St Edmunds a week later, and Gransden on the 31st. There you go, that’s just three I know of that are on this month. I’d urge you to make the effort to go and have a look. You’ll be pleasantly surprised.

    Nowt wrong with plugging something close to your heart, go for it I say.

    Unfortunately here in deepest Oxfordshire we don’t have events like this

    in reply to: To Spin…or Not to Spin #401905
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by Whiskey Delta
    It has to do with the inherent Postive Static Stability of the aircraft not CG. Your apprehension is fed by poor education and demonstation.

    Ah, more fabricated stats. Again, 60 years of training spins at my flight school and there are no fatalities or accidents as a result. Allow for a enough altitude to complete a 4 turn spin and you’ll be fine. Please quote me your source for accidents ratios.

    Release of back pressure before addition of rudder? I’ve never heard of a recovery even close to that. Isn’t it neutralize controls, opposite rudder, forward yoke and recover? I’ve never heard of an addition of back pressure as that will extend the stall state.

    Funny that you would consider a intentional emergency an suitable risk as long as it’s properly mananged yet you are arguing to no end that doing the same for spin training is unacceptable.

    Health warning? First I didn’t realize that there was a health risk involved with spinning. Perhaps if one is at risk for health related issues they shouldn’t be flying. Second, you spin apprihension is perpetuated from one pilot to the next just as you “stats” that prove it’s a fatal training procedure. Also just because someone was in the military doesn’t make them the be-all and end-all of pilot information. There are just as military idiot pilots as there are private sector pilots. Trust me, I’ve ended up flying with most of the idiots.

    A dinosaur? What changed in the last 20 years that made spin training outdated? The laws of physics didn’t shift did they?

    I never said that this is where it’s going to happen. Through a 15 hour student into an airplane for a solo practice of stalls and other manuvers and their inexperience can easily lead to them in advertantly spinning an aircraft. I’ve personally been there as have my students. It happens. Improper rudder or wind shift and send a power-on stall into a spin before you know it. If you haven’t experienced that yet as an instructor then it’s a matter of time.

    The training cycle puts every student pilot into many stituations that if not handled properly can put them in a spin. I’ve talked to plenty of FAA inspectors that have found themselves staring at the spinning earth as a result of the pilot applicant (both the fault of the pilot and as a result of outside factors). While performing power-on stalls with an Instrument student in a C172 we suddenly entered a spin with no corrolating input from myself or the student. I took the aircraft(As he was under the hood) and recovered from the spin. Assuming that the student had done something to cause our spin we did attempted the stall again with the same result but with the student recovering. It seems an unnoticeable inadvertant adjustment to the fixed rudder trim tab had thrown off our ability to control the aircraft in slow flight even though the ball was centered.

    It can happen, and believing other wise is fooling yourself and your student. Not preparing your student for every possiblity is cheating them.

    “Teach them to fly only on calm, clear, smooth days and during daylight hours and equip them with only enough knowledge so they don’t kill themselves?”

    I guess no one took any notice of what I said, Who is more likely to end up in an accidental spin than a ham fisted student , as far as I know low time students are the most likely candidates for an unintentional spin and therefor most definitely in need of PROPER spin appreciation and recovery training

    in reply to: C152 Formation Flying #402011
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by Whiskey Delta
    It has its place though like the little airshow at the local airport here. It was always a crowd pleaser to see a fleet of the schools own C152’s take to the sky and do some formation flying. At a larger, more professional gathering it wouldn’t really fit.

    Someone did use to do a C-150 Aerobat aerobatics routine at the big annual airshow up the road here. They pretended that the instructor forgot to remove the wheel chocks and when he got out the “student” pilot rumbled down the runway and started do all sorts of crazy manuvers once airbourne. It was a great show but I haven’t see it in 5 years.

    I think you have hit on the one place it would go down well but unfortunately we tend not to have su8ch things at many locations in the UK

    in reply to: C152 Formation Flying #402082
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by Whiskey Delta
    You definately don’t, I wonder why?

    PRobably because someone somewher decided at some stage that it would not impress airshow crowds and they were most likely right

    in reply to: What's the reason ? #402086
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by Moggy C
    Mike,

    I’m not unsympathetic.

    I’ve been there, done that and borrowed the t-shirt cos I couldn’t afford to buy one.

    I’m really just trying to act as the voice of your conscience.

    In all truth I could probably have started flying a few years before I did. But you get into an “I can’t possibly afford it” mindset.

    Just keep checking that your slight disposable income, and the cost of a few flying lessons don’t cross at some point without you noticing it.

    You are a long time dead.

    Moggy

    It’s ok Moggy, I knew you were’t being unsympathetic.

    I do, as you say, keep checking the small amount of disposable income. There is just one problem though, as soon as it starts to look promising the other half comes up with another project around the house or says “we can’t afford that”…..well she always says that she’d get more sense out of me if she turned herself into an aircraft(how true, and se wouldn’t answer back either

    in reply to: To Spin…or Not to Spin #402091
    mike currill
    Participant

    Originally posted by Whiskey Delta
    He’s wise beyond his years.

    Even though he’s 20 years old?

    in reply to: Wishful thinking #2098351
    mike currill
    Participant

    Sorry folks, I’ve just read my last offering and it would appear that I have a dyslexic computer

    in reply to: To Spin…or Not to Spin #402149
    mike currill
    Participant

    Iv’e done it again, not finishing what I’m saying.

    I should have added that this was the oppinion of a non-pilot

    in reply to: Wishful thinking #2098362
    mike currill
    Participant

    further to my previous psot, my son says that it is not a malicious rumour moer, a case of wishful thinking how right he is

    in reply to: To Spin…or Not to Spin #402153
    mike currill
    Participant

    Well here we go again. My son has just read through this and said he thinks spin training should be returned to the syllabus, to use his reasoning “if you are not taght how to recover from a spin what do you do if you accidentally get into one? shut your eyes and pray”

    in reply to: What's the reason ? #402289
    mike currill
    Participant

    sorry, forgot to finish what I was saying.
    If I started learning I could not bear to give it up without going through with it

    in reply to: What's the reason ? #402295
    mike currill
    Participant

    MOggy I agree that if you want something enough you can do it.
    This presupposes sufficient income to leave a pretty large surplus after the bills are paid without working overtime.
    In my job I’m either at work or asleep so I don’t have the time.
    If you’re married with a house, garden and car to keep then the surplus tomgo flyinug on is just not there

    in reply to: What's the reason ? #402440
    mike currill
    Participant

    Hi to Futurshox
    I know the feeling I’m an armchair pilot too and forever doomed to remain that way I fear but I have to agree with Moggy lovely shot of the Tri Pacer

Viewing 15 posts - 9,871 through 9,885 (of 9,892 total)