Kazakhstan :
Mi-8MTV-5 :

L-39C :

Poland :

SAAF :


Belgian Low-viz :

For SR-71 lovers, here’s its “brother”, the YF-12 :

and its armement, the AIM-47 Falcon :


12 and 8? The second one is perhaps the kinematic range in an ideal case, not the engagement range which is probably less than a third of that value (depending on the altitude and speed). The first is also a max in an ideal case at high altitude where the target maintains its course and speed. The idea that an Su-25 would be used to intercept the airliner is absurd. Theoretically it would be possible, but it would be very difficult in practice and require a decent amount of luck as well.
Of course, the two ranges are in an all ideal launches conditions of fighter and target (but a big airliner flying straight forward at 900 Km/h. is, unfortunately, an “easy” target). More normal combat conditions are quoted in the range of 4 Km in tail-chase.
Anyway, as you said, the Su-25 is not an ideal interceptor and, in addition, the R-60 is no more an ideal interception missile. This is more a self-defense one and it’s its main purpose on Su-25.
IMHO … also damage is inconsistent to the used weapon, a single AA-8 could never cause that kind of damage.
If I also consider that Su-25 intervention is unlikely, an interception doesn’t require necessarilly a pursuit between “hunter and hunted” at the same altitude and speed, but just a meeting point between the two aircrafts permitting to fire a missile that eliminate those differences (altitude, direction and speed).
And never be too affirmative about the damages that can cause missiles that seem “light” :
damages of a single 9K34 Strela-3 (SA-14 Gremlin) surface-to-air missile against DHL A300B4-203F in 2003 (8000 feet above Baghdad and warhead of 1,17 Kg) :
http://www.fredhoot.com/DHLairbus.html
The R-60 have a 3,5 Kg warhead and also consider that MH17 was shoot down at 33000 feet where its cabin was overpressured (a single hole in fuselage can cause catastrophic destruction).
PS : Range of R-60M and R-60MK is 12 Km head-on and 8 Km chase-on.
I am not an expert on warheads, but know enough about the subject to realise that the warhead of a Buk is most unlikely to “explode spherically”. So your air-to-air conclusion is invalid.
Explosion is more “cylindrical”.
3N12 warhead of 3M9 Kub system which is relatively similar (here “only” 57 Kg of blast fragmentation explosive) :

Lebanese UH-1D :

Germany :

Domenican AF :
C212 (2 types of roundels) :

Pillan :
“Russian Knights” :

US :

Ethiopian AF Su-27 :



Thanks, I already have that photo, sent to me by the man that took it during navigator training. It was taken in Ethiopia near Debre Zeit. If anyone can turn up any other photos of these machines, I’d be grateful.
Steve
I guess you also have pictures of the remains of this aircraft on Kismayo airport in 1993.