dark light

archangelski

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 2,330 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2284370
    archangelski
    Participant

    Kazakhstan :

    Mi-8MTV-5 :

    http://i.imgur.com/w6eV6zb.jpg

    L-39C :

    http://i.imgur.com/Eul4ssC.jpg

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2284373
    archangelski
    Participant

    Poland :

    http://i.imgur.com/1r5TGjC.jpg

    in reply to: Female Aviators #2284376
    archangelski
    Participant

    SAAF :

    http://i.imgur.com/3vASK5g.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/CXzVh3B.jpg

    in reply to: WORLD AIR FORCE ROUNDELS #2284389
    archangelski
    Participant

    Belgian Low-viz :

    http://i.imgur.com/ZgeFHb2.jpg

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2284395
    archangelski
    Participant

    For SR-71 lovers, here’s its “brother”, the YF-12 :

    http://i.imgur.com/H8TTzjG.jpg

    and its armement, the AIM-47 Falcon :

    http://i.imgur.com/p7QHbOWl.jpghttp://i.imgur.com/edBEiP2l.jpg

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2284400
    archangelski
    Participant

    12 and 8? The second one is perhaps the kinematic range in an ideal case, not the engagement range which is probably less than a third of that value (depending on the altitude and speed). The first is also a max in an ideal case at high altitude where the target maintains its course and speed. The idea that an Su-25 would be used to intercept the airliner is absurd. Theoretically it would be possible, but it would be very difficult in practice and require a decent amount of luck as well.

    Of course, the two ranges are in an all ideal launches conditions of fighter and target (but a big airliner flying straight forward at 900 Km/h. is, unfortunately, an “easy” target). More normal combat conditions are quoted in the range of 4 Km in tail-chase.
    Anyway, as you said, the Su-25 is not an ideal interceptor and, in addition, the R-60 is no more an ideal interception missile. This is more a self-defense one and it’s its main purpose on Su-25.

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2284435
    archangelski
    Participant

    IMHO … also damage is inconsistent to the used weapon, a single AA-8 could never cause that kind of damage.

    If I also consider that Su-25 intervention is unlikely, an interception doesn’t require necessarilly a pursuit between “hunter and hunted” at the same altitude and speed, but just a meeting point between the two aircrafts permitting to fire a missile that eliminate those differences (altitude, direction and speed).
    And never be too affirmative about the damages that can cause missiles that seem “light” :

    damages of a single 9K34 Strela-3 (SA-14 Gremlin) surface-to-air missile against DHL A300B4-203F in 2003 (8000 feet above Baghdad and warhead of 1,17 Kg) :

    http://www.fredhoot.com/DHLairbus.html

    The R-60 have a 3,5 Kg warhead and also consider that MH17 was shoot down at 33000 feet where its cabin was overpressured (a single hole in fuselage can cause catastrophic destruction).
    PS : Range of R-60M and R-60MK is 12 Km head-on and 8 Km chase-on.

    in reply to: Malaysian Airlineus 777 shot down over Ukraine #2284922
    archangelski
    Participant

    I am not an expert on warheads, but know enough about the subject to realise that the warhead of a Buk is most unlikely to “explode spherically”. So your air-to-air conclusion is invalid.

    Explosion is more “cylindrical”.
    3N12 warhead of 3M9 Kub system which is relatively similar (here “only” 57 Kg of blast fragmentation explosive) :

    http://i.imgur.com/1PVeeP5.jpg

    in reply to: Red Cross, Red Crescent, Red Star of David #2285852
    archangelski
    Participant

    Lebanese UH-1D :

    http://i.imgur.com/7winGKQ.jpg

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2285894
    archangelski
    Participant

    Germany :

    http://i.imgur.com/A5UOple.jpg

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2285895
    archangelski
    Participant

    Domenican AF :

    C212 (2 types of roundels) :

    http://i.imgur.com/yUstyaU.jpg

    Pillan :
    http://i.imgur.com/3VdbkmV.jpg

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2285896
    archangelski
    Participant

    “Russian Knights” :

    http://i.imgur.com/cD1kADI.jpg

    in reply to: Female Aviators #2285897
    archangelski
    Participant

    US :

    http://i.imgur.com/uCMMLa8.jpg

    in reply to: WORLD AIR FORCE ROUNDELS #2285899
    archangelski
    Participant

    Ethiopian AF Su-27 :

    http://i.imgur.com/emDIL2g.jpg

    http://i.imgur.com/xHHQeQC.jpg

    http://i.imgur.com/hyLdHt4.jpg

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #16 #2287589
    archangelski
    Participant

    Thanks, I already have that photo, sent to me by the man that took it during navigator training. It was taken in Ethiopia near Debre Zeit. If anyone can turn up any other photos of these machines, I’d be grateful.

    Steve

    I guess you also have pictures of the remains of this aircraft on Kismayo airport in 1993.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,246 through 1,260 (of 2,330 total)