dark light

QuadroFX

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 322 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2321462
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Another reason to use in design of a canopy of T-50 a separate deflector(front part of canopy) is a way of leaving the pilot cockpit in case of ejection. When canopy is separating, the oncoming flow simply tear off pilot’s head, so the deflector is made as separate element.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2321622
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Why not just buy the canopy from the Chinese then? They obviousely dont find it that difficult..

    Buying stolen one? No way …
    http://paralay.iboards.ru/download/file.php?id=12040&t=1
    via paralay

    So another question for you, the tip up part will be in front or will in be in the rear of the two pieces canopy?

    As it is now – rear part.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2322711
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    There are no problems with the development of polycarbonate canopy, but silicate…
    Silicate canopy less durable than polycarbonate, for this reason on the canopy of T-50 mounted a longitudinal crosspiece. But silicate canopy stand high temperatures, it has better optical qualities.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2322826
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Yes, it is working out large silicate tip-up part of canopy with dimensions: 1525x805mm

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2322845
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Let’s close the theme about canopy of T-50. It never will frameless. Frameless will be only tip-up part of canopy.
    http://s013.radikal.ru/i325/1101/fb/18ef016cfcc6t.jpghttp://i020.radikal.ru/1101/65/ae65d8f115d4t.jpghttp://s013.radikal.ru/i322/1101/20/9d6b72e5dbcdt.jpg

    http://paralay.iboards.ru/viewtopic.php?p=37444#p37444

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2328423
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Why would a mechanical and flight systems demonstrator, with absolutely no requirement for low observables, have zigzags?

    Ask Hotdog, he know.

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2328458
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Hey, zziggzzaggz, where are you?!
    http://s012.radikal.ru/i320/1101/71/81beb99501d7t.jpg

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2328548
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Oh my ****ing god!!!111 There are no any zzzzigggzzzzagggzzzz!!!
    http://s011.radikal.ru/i315/1101/81/d84a6c8310f1t.jpghttp://s013.radikal.ru/i322/1101/fb/a5599f5a2578t.jpghttp://i021.radikal.ru/1101/0f/668c7e8f0dcbt.jpghttp://s014.radikal.ru/i327/1101/d0/8dc852064f64t.jpghttp://s015.radikal.ru/i331/1101/8c/ff683294382dt.jpghttp://s009.radikal.ru/i308/1101/16/7185bde60724t.jpghttp://s010.radikal.ru/i311/1101/00/9d63cf27dd96t.jpghttp://s010.radikal.ru/i313/1101/3c/13632885a171t.jpghttp://i039.radikal.ru/1101/43/d7744f142918t.jpghttp://s007.radikal.ru/i300/1101/ba/301ad5208cf0t.jpg

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2329715
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    the t-50 prototype going on and suddenly performing air show maneuvers for Putin? Did not seem it was so far ahead in its flight testing, and yet it was, perhaps evidence of flights that were going on for a longer than released time, or evidence of lack of information about the status of the program (as in by that time the plane had passed enough test points to perform the maneuvers).

    Between the first flight on 29 January and a demonstration for Putin on June 17 passed five months.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2329719
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    In my opinion its a reliable source Quadro, because if you remember Groomi has also said in secretprojects “Maybe in first quarter of the next year”

    The “first quarter” is the wide definition, isn’t it? T-50-2 long been ready for flight.
    ***
    From the latter – there will be small differences between the T-50-1 and T-50-2, they will be visible.

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2329861
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Same for the Russian PAK FA (the plane had take-off well before)

    Evidence?

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2330133
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    As such, the CHinese have at least at the moment the better position.

    No, given that from flight of J-20 Chinese wants to do the bombast show with premeditated leaks, Hu Jintao, dressed up clowns, and squadrons of J-10.
    Nothing personal and sorry for my bad English.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2330145
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    In 2011 flight tests will begin 3 T-50.
    Official thrust of izd.117 is 15000kgf, but according to the employee of “Saturn”, it is 15700.

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2330147
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    They are talking too much … in Chengdu they are working.

    Calm down your bravura, please. Do not behave yourself like infant fan-boy! I understand your feelings, because I had such the same a year ago, but I did not write such… nonsense. By the way, I’ll admit that I was wrong when i did not believe in the existence of J-20.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XV #2330280
    QuadroFX
    Participant

    Give it a few months.

    Hey, troll, go away.

    Oh my god Is it a different version or the second prototype?

    The only reason to postpone the flight of T-50-2 is a very cold weather. No, T-50-2 will not different from the T-50-1

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 322 total)