dark light

scotavia

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 2,399 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RAF St Mawgan – the unluckiest spotter? #1205242
    scotavia
    Participant

    Councils and operating an airport have a poor track record in the UK. My home town Blackpool saw very little change while the council owned the place.
    In Scotland the Oban airfield has cost the council a fortune for little return,they took the best person off the job of promoting the place.

    Good luck St Mawgan you deserve better.

    in reply to: Air to air in 2008 with Darren Harbar #493145
    scotavia
    Participant

    Wonderful views Darren thanks, I do get to fly and take photos in my line of work however North Scotland is packed with scenery with few aircraft for air to air. So I still have some envy !
    Gary
    http://www.scotaviaimages.co.uk

    in reply to: Aerial photos of london #1238460
    scotavia
    Participant

    By strange co incidence I work as an aerial photographer and my surname is Brindle.

    in reply to: Pathfinders – TV Series #1166986
    scotavia
    Participant

    Family at War did include sequences shot at night of NX611 at Blackpool.

    scotavia
    Participant

    Remakes

    There is some confusion about remaking a film I think. For example how many films have been made about the events of D Day? Some are epics, others focus on a few characters eg Band of Brothers.

    The core story is the starting point of the events and then it is really a matter of what slant the script decides to focus on. The Dambusters film tended to be more on the technology. I would like to see the characters given a greater depth. Certainly the ability to mount cameras in confined spaces can be used to convey flying sequences with a greater impact on the viewer. Can we be served a bigger helping of emotional moments so that the film has a lasting effect and is not just a film about WW2 aircraft on a dams raid.

    in reply to: WW2 Aircraft Wrecks in the English channel(2008) #1181149
    scotavia
    Participant

    Those who bother

    While many readers of this forum are avid armchair enthusiasts very few are actually involved in preservation,storage ,recovery of parts. There are many reasons for this.
    However it might be considerate to give credit to those who do make an effort with limited funds and space.

    in reply to: Looking for aviation history links #1190755
    scotavia
    Participant

    Plymouth area history

    A large free resource which includes aviation photo collections
    http://www.cyber-heritage.co.uk/

    in reply to: Aviation Archaeology and the MOD #1218166
    scotavia
    Participant

    This part of the MOD protection of military remains can be a farce. Its an insult to those who have lost relatives. The whole concept of war grave is flawed on an aircraft crash site when the location is known and access is possible. There was a time when only the military had detection gear and recovery kit. Many groups in the UK have a good track record of well monitored,safe recovery excavations. It is high time the act was reviewed.

    in reply to: Tempest II restoration, any updates? #1232381
    scotavia
    Participant

    But surely they were single engined?

    Ok I will get my coat…

    scotavia
    Participant

    wow..I remember calling at the Plynlimon p38 site, My mate recovered a fuel pump, I recall the smell as he dismantled it. He applied power to it and it still worked.

    scotavia
    Participant

    Tighar

    Well its not really anti Tighar feelings. More a case of getting annoyed when a group based outside the UK gives an impression that they are the most experienced in the field and that gets lots of Uk based recovery people cheesed off and rightly so.

    It just happens that Tighar generates a lot of press releases while most Uk teams get on with the job then publicise the results.

    Tangmere is spot on to highlight the inconsistent approach of MOD and public funded museums to organised recovery.

    in reply to: Possible UK underwater wrecksites….. #1238654
    scotavia
    Participant

    Nairn Defiant

    Very shallow water subject to srtong waves in winter. I dont recall anything when I flew over but will take a closer look when its clear. See the layout here on my site..
    http://www.scotaviaimages.co.uk/gallery/index.cgi?mode=search&searchstring=nairn

    in reply to: Duxford September Airshow list now online #1239712
    scotavia
    Participant

    The shocking truth is that windbreaks and other obstructions along the fence line unless part of an official enclosure have no legal validity. The people who put them there are not expecting anyone to challenge the claim. if I wander along and decide to stand in a windbreak section to get a particular photo angle then apart from stupid comments from the self appointed “owner ” of the windbreak section there is nothing to stop me. Threats of violence will be met with silence and if anything happens the person will be filmed and reported to the police.

    My ticket price entitles me to stand and move in the public areas and no one is going to stop me .

    in reply to: Investigating aircraft crash sites #1168122
    scotavia
    Participant

    Lifeboat records can help. Civil defence records may exist, such as when i looked in filing cabinets at the Flowers Hill bunker Bristol during duty cover for the firemans strike. There were many uncensored photo prints of raid damage and some air craft incidents. hope the records got saved or perhaps are still in the bunker. The bunker had been used for exercises into the seventies.

    in reply to: Underground Hangars To protect war planes #1176991
    scotavia
    Participant

    try this website..
    http://www.subbrit.org.uk/

Viewing 15 posts - 1,966 through 1,980 (of 2,399 total)