even more interesting how many will be mothballed the second new customers realize it doesnt run
at the cost of F-16
But if it can do the job of an F-16 in most cases with 1/2 the aircraft, doesn’t that make up for it? How many F-16s would it take to kill 1 S-300? How many F-35s?
When Iran finally gets its 1st S-300 batteries, Im sure allies wont be clamoring for cheap F-16s
Im simply pointing out your bias. You seem dismissive now that the article doesn’t fit your ideas.
So when war is boring posts a story against the
F-35 the are treated as luminaries and poets.
When the story is in favor of the F-35, no one knows what they are talking about.
When its the Rand study, everyone ran with “Cant fight cant turn cant climb”
Now that a sim says things differently, the sim must be broken.
Msphere I understand being skeptical, but really?
Msphere read the article again. David said that even with Amraam C the outcome was the same. Nice try.
Do you have a link sir? Id hate for this to be bumped down over a personal agenda.
From the Red Air perspective
1.) One of the very cool aspects of a sandbox simulation like*CMANO*is its ability to jump into a Gods-eye view showing all sides, or even to switch sides. Let’s take a look at this scenario from the Flankers’ point of view.
2.) With my four Flankers spaced roughly 40 nautical miles apart, I am hoping that I can pick up an F-35 in our wide sweep. Intel has said there are F-35s in the Baltic — but where are they?
3.) Getting closer — but my radars are still not picking anything up.
4.) Meanwhile it is a very uncomfortable experience to be flying into a zone where stealth fighters have been reported. I have PESA radar and 40 missiles between us — but we still haven’t picked up a sniff of the F-35s.
David AXE simulation F-35 vs Su-35
Do the Russians really have that many versions of this plane? Its dizzying.
http://air-attack.com/page/9/Switchblade.html
I still think the switchblade concept would have made a great 6 th gen naval fighter.
Even better with advent engines and onboard dew. It was such a sexy concept.
Songun the tip of the spear.
I thought thats what SAR, EOTS, and Das are for. Lpi radar with advanced algorithms, and Das slews the optical system. For all of the F-35s faults finding a target in clutter shouldn’t be a problem. Das is being reported capable of detecting cannon, and mortar fire.
Its not just a MAWs. The U.S. would be wise to follow up on this.
The more I analize the question the more doubts I have about my capacity to imagine how the 6th
generation would look alike.
My first guess would have been about an high velocity plane with radically innovative propulsion systems but now I question myself…
It would surely be a great thing for what it concern A2A part but for ground attacks?
Above all against the actual form of hybrid warfare, started by Hezzies in 2006 but now adopted by Islamist also on in both Iraq and Syria.
Dispersion, concealment, tunnel burrowing, entrenchment in civilian areas but also a dispersed command structure with a network capability that allow them to mount on large scale military operations with a short notice?
Cruising at more than mach 3 doesn’t seems me to help at all in facing such kind of opponents.Probably It will mean to left definitely aside the ideas of having another “jack of all trades” like the F-35 capable to cover all spectrum of possible missions and revert toward an, hopefully not too vast array of more specialized planes.
Remember, we are discussing a Raptor replacement. Once you get the high end kinematic performance nailed, stand off strike is easy. If you could find a way to drop
A weapon at mach 3 it would be devastating. In fact even if it was some kind of tungsten, or Du 250lb penetrating rod,
Sams wouldn’t stand a chance.
The high end high speed is to kill 5th generation fighters and kick the door in.
I don’t think Id would fight a Su-35 in anything less than a 5th gen fighter.
Are we ahead in our fighter designs? Yes. Would I send any fighter at the Russians? No. They must be respected.
Here’s a Super Hornet report.*http://www.gao.gov/archive/199…
Here’s a F-16 report.*http://archive.gao.gov/f0902b/…
Here’s an F-22 report.*http://csbaonline.org/publicat…
re GAO reports negative on every U.S. aircraft?
Have we EVER had a glowing report on a platform?
Is there any modern fighter the Typhoon HASN’T been beaten by?
F-22 check
F-16 check
Su-30 check
Rafale check
F-18E
F-35
F-15
Lets keep a tally, this may come in handy