dark light

Jessmo23

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 372 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2167581
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    Because no promise was made to you.

    For most customers the choice is simple. There are six aircraft available – F-35, SH, F-15E, EF, Rafale & Gripen E. Pick one. (What the JAST promised in 1992 is irrelevant.)

    And so far everybody has picked the F-35. You can chalk it up to corruption, or political pressure or just coincidence. In any event, brace yourself because there are more orders coming yet.

    Because most European air forces would put the F-35 over the Eurocanards & Teens at the air-to-air role as well. Its LO characteristics apply to both ground and air based radars.

    LOL the concept applies to the F-22, but apparently NOT the F-35. Again more inconsistencies.
    In fact the F-22 and F-35 will fire Amraams at around the same speed, mach 1.5, but thats not good enough.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2167821
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    It’s easy.. Practically everything except point #4 also applies to the F-22, but Raptor is still a respected fighter and think it’s the right tool for the job.. It has been designed for air superiority missions and most likely it’s darn good at that.. Same with Typhoon whose primary role has always been A-A..

    But the Raptor isnt competing against the F-35 the Typhoon IS! My point is your constantly bashing the F-35 on its perceived value (or lack thereof) ? but the Euro-canards constantly get a pass. Atleast you get a Stovl, super sonic Aesa day fighter out of the box.
    It fits its role perfectly, just like the F-22. Can it do A2A like a F-22? No. Will it get the job done? Yes.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168012
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    The same with the Rafael

    -No self designation for years.

    -Inferior kinematic performance to F-22,Su-35

    -Just now recieving AESA

    -Extremely exspensive for a NON LO, no escort jamming, aircraft. Remember it cant out run or out climb a SU-35.

    -Exspensive French weapons.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168018
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    Of course it is totally different.. Because if Rafale is chosen, then we know that a well designed, established system has been chosen.. albeit a costly one, no doubt about it.. But choosing the F-35 based on mission effectiveness is like electing a horse for a president.. that cannot be even meant seriously..

    Why Then doesn’t this logic apply to the Typhoon?

    -Early block planes not being upgradeable.

    -Early blocks being useless for most missions

    -No ability to self designate until years after operational

    -Still no operational AESA in 2016.

    -Extremely exspensive for a non LO Non AESA fighter, with limited weapons sets, no active jamming, and hold over radars from the 90s.

    -Exspensive to maintain.

    How are you defending the Euro-fighter?

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168411
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    small orders don’t mean much to F-35 programme but it certainly accelerate closing down of other programmes. so there will be no backup for next 40 years.

    So does this mean if 27 planes are cut its no big deal?
    Lol

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2168763
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    F-35 is huge programme it can’t survive on F-18 production rates. Denmark order is too small and likely spread over many years.

    Dat Death spiral

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169168
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    First, not my nation.
    Mine is Dante Alighieri,Petrarca, Boccaccio, Michelangelo, Botticelli, Raffaello, Leonardo, Poliziano, Brunelleschi, Ariosto, Tasso, Caravaggio, Verdi, Rossini, Bellini… and other twenty pages like so…

    So, in your own list the only one you can found as an example of american literature is Mark Twain?
    Yes, he is certanly a great writer but almost add Edgar Allan Poe, Hawthorne,Steinbeck, Bukowski, Miller, Pound, Hemingway just to try playing in the same league please…
    Certainly you can put also cinema in the art list and almost in this sector your own nation would fare excellently but also in this: Spielberg as the top????
    Maybe the issue is right here…

    Obviously take all this talking as an half ironic one. No one want to diminish your nation, just to remember that military might, economical wealth and technical prowess are not the only sectors that define a civilization.

    My favorite author is Stan Lee.
    Now hows about that F-35 lol

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169294
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    How would the F-35 deal with decoy targets? That was the question.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169328
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    this approach wont work. All those bombers need air tankers for refueling. there can be a lot decoys and camo techniques that decrease the actual bomb to the target much less. diesel-electric subs that are much quieter and numerous than SSGN can effectively hit land and ships.

    Its 30 planes. If we cant muster enough tankers for 30 aircraft we have bigger problems.
    @Msphere Im not the one presenting the Russians as impossible to beat.
    If The Russians are going to fire nukes off, on a war they provoked, and over losing SAMs in Kalingrad then they are indeed a danger to the planet. I would recommend the president launch a pre-emptive strike.
    Did you see what I did? I used a ridiculous level of escalation as a cop out.
    This is what some people here do when they lose an argument. X would never fight Y because it would mean the end of the world.
    I don’t know if youve looked at the Russian Frontier lately but it certainly seems like they are planning to fight us conventionaly.
    Back to planes.

    What are the ways NATO could avoid decoys.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169497
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    70 miles maybe in high altitude at higher speed. if you using saturated attack with steath aircrafts. it means you are creating a lot of activity at airbases and in the air and this can easily be detected in 21st century. there is no element of surprise.

    The point was that If the U.S. and allies are determined there isnt a IADS that can stop them.

    Id use:

    2xOhios that would launch 200 Tlams
    10xs F-35s with 80 SDB and 20 amraams
    4 XB-2s with 100 sbds each. Thats 400
    And 12 F-22s.
    4 B-52s firing Malds
    Thats only 30 aircraft and 2 subs.
    I would bet on that force to literally smash all of the Air defenses and fields in Kalingrad.
    The thing working against the defender is the idea that only 1 bombs needs to get through.

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169577
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    SDB range is in excess of 70 miles.
    The U.S. could always just brute force it and use a B-2 or B-21 with 200+ SDBs

    I call this operation our arrows shall blot out the sun

    https://youtu.be/xcYmlfhShIg

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169614
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    Stick around, there is alot you don’t know.
    The 1st step when you have a problem is….

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169663
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    What? Dropping gliding bombs at supersonic velocity?

    ROFL

    http://www.edwards.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123107101

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169753
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    LoL what do you think Das is for?

    in reply to: F-35 News and discussion (2016) take III #2169787
    Jessmo23
    Participant

    Not from any ranges that would matter, if you can see it with they can see you long before that. You are on foreign territory with several radars covering and overlapping and sending interceptors towards you. Stealth is only an asset it does not make you invisible, forget about such dreams. F-35 does not have the speed to extent its reach nor reduce its time in enemy territory or enemy weapons range.

    LoL, the F-35 would launch JDAMS/ Sdb at the same speed as the F-22, Mach 1.6
    If the SAM in theory can see the F-35 then Big SAR can see the sam. If the SAM launches then every F-35 in theatre knows Its location. Hiding works. It worked for the Serbs. Try hiding

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 372 total)