dark light

ianwoodward9

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 806 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: "The Dam Busters" 17 May 2018 #806030
    ianwoodward9
    Participant
    in reply to: The 1946 SBAC display and exhibition held at Radlett #806037
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    If it is jets you seek: the Meteor has clipped wings and does not stand out too well; # 48 is actually a Sea Vampire (but I doubt anyone would spot that from the photograph); the other Vampire is less clear because of the oblique angle of the photograph but it is there; #2 is not powered at all but was a model for two later ones that were jet-powered; and look quite carefully at # 10.

    Incidentally, the Swallow (#14) was the second aircraft built (TS306)

    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    There are a couple of Vampires and a Meteor in the line-up, too, but, yes, I was going to comment later on the preponderance of tailwheel aircraft. It is very marked. And, by way of contrast, wasn’t this a period when, for example, Douglas was beginning to phase out DC-4 production?

    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    I found this, a photo of the two seat Spit in question taken by Charles E Brown – a great study in shadow and light. It isn’t dated but was published in 1947, so I assume it was taken in mid-September 1946 in the course of the SBAC show at Radlett.

    in reply to: The 1946 SBAC display and exhibition held at Radlett #806359
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    A contemporary report included this: Another of the new, hitherto unmentioned aircraft displayed was the Spitfire Trainer. A second seat for the instructor is introduced behind and slightly above the pupil occupying the usual cockpit. This conversion can be applied to any Spitfire but the airframe exhibited was a converted Spitfire L.F. Mk. VIII.

    As it had first flown just a few days before, the ‘hitherto unmentioned‘ fits. Does the LF VIII ?

    A little riddle – next to ’45’ is aircraft ’46’, which is a ………. 47?

    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    The photograph I posted, Mark12, is from the 1946 show and not from the 1947 show.

    [1] It was published in early 1947.

    [2] The article you posted is clearly a preview of the 1947 show and, thus, illustrated with a photo from the 1946 show.

    That said, I note that someone has written Charles Brown’s name on the photo, so that seems to confirm my comment as to the photographer.

    EDIT: Derbyhaven made the same point as me at roughly the same time. The date of the 1946 show was 12 and 13 September.

    in reply to: Old Aviation Advertisements #806372
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    The aviation ancestry website includes a number of Fairey adverts showing off their Gannets. I don’t think this one is on that website:

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go (2018 and onwards) #806463
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    Not as low as in some other photos here but this Mustang was called “Daisy Cutter” in the caption and, being published in early 1944, this was not a display for the public but possibly preparation for the ‘real thing’.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go (2018 and onwards) #809915
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    I can’t imagine that this clip has not been posted before but, in case not, here’s a BA VC-10 (G-ARVM) making a low pass at the White Waltham air show in 1977.

    The relevant part is at [approximately] 2.45 to 3.00………… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XlSaJGtF5g

    Here’s a still:

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #810643
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    On 13 October 1938, a director of Lufthansa ((Carl August Von Gablenz) addressed the Lilienthal-Gesell- schaft fur Luftfahrtforschung in Berlin; the Lilienthal Society was concerned with aeronatical science. It was named after Otto Lilienthal who delivered a lecture on “The Theory of Bird Flight” in 1873. He and his brother were members of the Aeronautical Society of Great Britain (but only because there was no similar society in Germany).

    Getting back to Von Gablenz, he gave a lot of information about Lufthansa’s operations in the pre-war period, including this map of the airline’s expansion. The area enclosed by the continuous line shows the geographical scope of its services in 1926. The line of dashes shows how much it had expanded its services by 1932.

    The lines made up of dashes and dots shows the range of activities in 1938. The route going to the east was Berlin to Kabul (6310 Km).

    Then there were the routes shown going west. The northerly one, Berlin – New York route (8234 Km), was via Lisbon and Horta.

    There were two routes going south-west: Berlin – Natal in Brazil (9607 Km) and Berlin – Santiago de Chile (15,622 Km). In his lecture, he does not mention Lisbon (or any other intermediate stops, for that matter) for these two routes but I suspect Lisbon was a stopover of some kind.

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #810881
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    David, once again, many thanks for your efforts. If I interpret your information correctly, the photograph was probably taken in November 1938.

    I will PM you.

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #811084
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    Thanks once again, Adrian. At more or less the time as we’re talking about, changes were afoot.

    On 5 April 1939, an American newspaper article headlined “Yankee Clipper Reaches England” was illustrated it with two photographs taken in Southampton the previous day. More than half the article, with the sub-heading “Picture Sent by New Method”, was spent describing the Western Union process. By this method, it took up to 20 minutes to transmit a 6″ x 7″ picture.

    The other photograph transmitted was of the dignitaries; this is the one of Yankee Clipper (I suspect that modern scanning has rendered it in less good quality than it appeared in the original newspaper):

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #811131
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    Thank you, David. That would be much appreciated. My source for the dates was AJ Jackson’s ‘British Civil Aircraft 1919-59 Vol.1″, which is coming up for being 60 years old, so subsequent research may well have overtaken his information.

    Thanks, too, for your information, Adrian. If ‘Guba II” had first arrived in Sydney on 12 April 1939 and if it would have taken, say, 10-12 days to get a photo taken, processed and back to London, then to go through however long it took to get the photo in the magazine and the magazine printed and published – that has to throw doubt on the date put forward by Jackson. Or am I reading this all wrong?

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #811252
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    I hope you don’t mind my going way off topic but the same magazine presented me with another conundrum.

    The photo below was taken in Rose Bay, Sydney and shows three Empire flying boats (G-AFCT, VH-ABB and G-AEUA (left to right). Fair enough but what’s that in the distant background, on the left of the photograph? The caption refers to “the Consolidated flying boat which is to be used for a survey flight across the Indian Ocean“. My reference books are all quite old but I assume this is the original ‘Guba’ (NC777). The book says that it arrived in Sydney on 12 April 1939 and left on 4 June 1939.

    The conundrum is that the magazine is cover-dated April 1939. I realise that the magazine might not have been published on the 1st of the month but it was printed in England. If ‘Guba’ did arrive in Sydney on 12 April 1939, how long would it have taken for this photograph to have reached the UK?

    in reply to: WWII Flights To Lisbon #811273
    ianwoodward9
    Participant

    My scanner is in dock for a service/repair at the moment, so the image I posted was taken with my pocket camera. I’ve done a bit of fiddling around with it, though, and your deduction as to the identity of the other Ju52 (PP-CAZ) looks bang on to me. It is the upper of the two aircraft shown here:

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 806 total)