dark light

shepsair

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 266 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Robs Lamplough Me-109E-1 #1085383
    shepsair
    Participant

    Bf109

    There is also this one.

    http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/G-EMIL.html

    http://www.luftwaffe.no/5JG5.html

    Supposedly nearing completion in UK for European client.

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Me109E being (re)build? #1087447
    shepsair
    Participant

    Bf109

    Well the background/building looks familiar 🙂

    Need to follow up on a few Bf109E projects 1983, 2023, 3523 and where they are and how they are progressing.

    Just completed an update on 3579 and its post ‘White 14’ life.

    Mark

    PS – Would be nice for someone to buy the Swiblosee Bf109G-6 project.

    in reply to: P40 interior #943612
    shepsair
    Participant

    P40

    Did look for en electrical feed on the outside but so used to seeing it on the side with German aircraft, can now see it had a plug in at the bottom.

    No idea what the face would have looked like without cover removed.

    Thank you one and all.

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Flying 'Soviet' Huricane/Spitfire Please! #943735
    shepsair
    Participant

    Soviet colours

    I more than most want to see some authentic Soviet schemes.

    Hurricane IIB Trop AM274 is being completed and the plan is to have her flying in Soviet colours.

    Hurricane IIB Trop Z5207 is being restored and is being finished in Finish colours which will also be unusual though 81Sqn/151Wing scheme would also have been nice and unusual.

    Z5227 is still out there waiting to be restored. She was FE-53 with 81Sqn/151Wing.

    Of course so many Ex Soviet P40’s have been restored but not one has flown in Soviet colours – not even for a single season which is a shame.

    Plans were around to complete Greg Eppels? P40E 41-13570 as ’51’ in Soviet colours if even for a single season. Few years off yet though.

    No, it would be nice.

    regards

    Mark

    shepsair
    Participant

    Allen

    Hi Andy,

    Yep, I did notice that. Came up on the FB feed for RAF site.

    http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/archive/missing-no-more-20072012

    Look forward to reading the full story.

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Restored Klimov Engine Run (For Yak 1) #946820
    shepsair
    Participant

    Yak-1

    Definitely not a Merlin but a sound I would love to hear on a completed an airworthy Yak-1.

    Lets hope the next Il-2 restoration they fit a Mikulin AM-38F. Would like to hear one of those as well.

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Restored Klimov Engine Run (For Yak 1) #947616
    shepsair
    Participant

    Klimov

    Thanks Seafuryfan,

    Love doing the research and writing. Usually they are twice as long with a lot more info though magazines have to cut to fit these days.

    Been a busy few months, Yak-1, then the P40 Kittyhawk, then the He-115 and now another Yak-1 recovery and Il-2 recovery. Shortly a FM-2 from Lake Michigan. All have been written (except the FM-2) and hopefully are in the process of being published over the next few months.

    regards

    Mark

    Love the Yak-1 and the hostry and would love to see her restored and flying with a Bf109E.

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #961140
    shepsair
    Participant

    P40

    Andy,

    Qattara is right in a way – the area to the east (his left hand side) was a large sandy area. If he had no issue with the undercarriage and it was retracted then it would be assumed a pilot he would prefer to land on flat sand there than a rocky terrain. (Definitely the case in the Arctic circle with lake v tundra).

    The landing does seem to be harder than other P40 crash landings with all of the chin cowl, radiators and bottom of the engine taken off.

    Anyway, it is all assumptions at the end of the day.

    Peter is right, thread is starting to get a bit tedious. Lets hope there will be some good news and significant news to report soon.

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #962030
    shepsair
    Participant

    P40

    Hi Qattara,

    I am getting more and more confused by some statements.

    He obviously did not bail out unless he managed to shut the canopy on exiting the aircraft.

    It looks as though he may have tried to retract the undercarriage (if the starboard leg is in the wheel well which is possible as only one tyre/wheel has been located). Knowing they were fixed down he may have ensured he landed on a rocky area to ensure the undercarriage snapped off. It shows the port wheel did not retract and damage to the tail plane from the impact. If you know you had your undercarriage fixed down I would be looked to ‘remove it’ rather than try to force land on sand and risk turning over. This is also assume he could see rock, it may well have been more sandy 70 years ago than today?

    Personally, the fuselage damage to me seems more like flak (through bottom of fusealge and out through thet top) than air to air having seen numerous recovered aircraft with machine gun and cannon fire damage.

    There were quite a few P40 units in the area, not just 260Sqn.

    No. 233 Wing
    2 Squadron SAAF
    4 Squadron SAAF
    5 Squadron SAAF
    260 Squadron RAF

    No. 239 Wing
    3 Squadron SAAF
    112 Squadron RAF
    250 Squadron RAF
    450 Squadron RAAF

    The note about the Qattara depression on Sheppard’s account I also found interesting as he does mention on the right. I too thought it might be on the left when he flew off and headed to 53RSU. To me it seems more straight ahead though again we are not sure of his final setting when he flew off to Cairo.

    Again, the 240 degree is the direction they started and assumed to be for 35-40 minutes assumed to be around 170 knots (with ET574 wheels down). Sheppard landed 1 hour, 50min later.

    As for the radio. We will never know. Sheppard stated he broke radio silence but got no reply from Copping.

    I doubt we will ever know what truly happened but until I see some other firm evidence, I will go on what we know from the records and assessment of what we can see from the photos.

    regards

    Mark

    PS The family are obtaining his service record. It is thought he arrived in North Africa in March 1942 (to be confirmed) and was the more experienced of the two pilots hence why he led.

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #962208
    shepsair
    Participant

    P40

    Hi Qattara,

    I am just trying to fathom why you think the wing man Sheppard’s account is not correct as he was actually there?

    I appreciate it was from a book he published 45 years later but is also collaborated by official documents at the time (his log book and loss record) which seem to confirm the story?!

    260Sqn records are very limited (there was no adjutant at the time) and record nothing.

    The only thing unclear is possibly the reprimand by the pilot by the C/O for damaging the aircraft (though I have still seen no evidence) and if as reported elsewhere does not seem to be classed as pilot error. What is known as three P40’s were damaged on a reconnaissance flight on the morning of the 28th June (by light accurate flak) and two (assumed to be two of the three including ET574) were then flown back to 53RSU for repair, with replacements due to be picked up.

    Sheppard’s log book confirmed Copping flew the wrong way and could not be turned. The loss report indicates the direction of travel (240 degrees instead of 110 degrees again the wrong direction). These were written at the time.

    I have not seen any evidence to contradict this.

    If the starboard undercarriage is in the wheel well, then it looks as though Copping did attempt to retract the undercarriage which seems highly sensible and was a standard procedure. (The undercarriage was confirmed as locked down for the transfer flight). If the starboard leg did retract (you confirmed it was in the wheel well??), the damage port definitely did not and this was sheared off in the force landing.

    Would be interesting to know you thoughts on his loss which is different to the available evidence?

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #966289
    shepsair
    Participant

    P40

    Andy,

    Seem to recall that RAFM were unaware of the existence of the P40 Kittyhawk until Bruce contacted them at the end of April when it was all being discussed on the site. Qattara indicating Ian Thirsk/RAFM were informed in Feb does int seem to stack up though will check with him and Paul Collins.

    Qattara have yet to furnish photos of when they discovered her untouched on 12th Feb (before Jakub on 27th Feb). 70 years in the desert and two teams find her within two weeks of each other.

    David, as for untouched, I still believe it was. I know it is a lot further from civilisation but North Africa had thousands of tons of war debris and all has been completely removed for scrap. Being a P40 has nothing to do with it – it is just scrap and therefore has some monetary value which would have meant it would have been partially or fully stripped by now if discovered before.

    I tend to believe Copping is still out there and still to be found.

    Copping does not have a grandson. I am assuming Qattra means he is trying to talk to the grand nephew who is called John.

    RAFM/Defence Attache are doing there best but there is so much going on in Egypt at the moment it is not easy.

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #967547
    shepsair
    Participant

    P40

    David,

    The general impression was that it had been untouched between June 42 and Feb 2012 just due to the fact it was complete. There seemed to be nothing missing. If it had been discovered at any time in the past, the stripping/vandalism would have happened then just as much as it has occurred now.

    I have mentioned before that I think it should be preserved (partially restored) to as it was on 27th Feb when first discovered. As it suffers more and more damage then of course this thought diminishes also.

    regards

    Mark

    in reply to: Polished P40 #969358
    shepsair
    Participant

    P40

    Another Ex Soviet P40B/C airframe and still no Russian scheme. Thats four restored now and none carry an historic scheme.

    I know they are not the crowd puller but have always preferred an historic scheme to a fictitious one.

    Great work by Matt Nightingale and team though.

    Mark

    in reply to: 70 years ago – 28.06.42 – RIP F/Sgt Dennis Copping #976715
    shepsair
    Participant

    Kittyhawk v Copping

    Um, 1100 ‘thoughts’ regarding the Kittyhawk and only 7 ‘thoughts’ in relation to the pilot on the anniversary of the day he went missing.

    Mark

    in reply to: What a man. Grp Cpt Mike Stephens #978776
    shepsair
    Participant

    Amazing

    Ditto – amazing guy but they all were.

    RIP

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 266 total)