dark light

MohammedAli

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 107 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese Air Power Thread 17 #2196168
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    Chinese forums have been buzzing with rumors that two engines — the medium thrust ws-13 (J-31, FC-1) and the light thrust ws-17(first I heard of the designation) for the L-15 — are entering full production.

    Why would WS-13 enter full production when there are no airplanes in production that will use that engine? Unless ones assumes China is going to start building FC-1s for itself, as J-31 is no where near its production and the PAF is content with RD-93s

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2198676
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    Is this drone news item related to Pakistan Air Force as this thread is?

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2191510
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    How are these ratios calculated, ie total airframes over number of pilots, or does it account for airframe availability. Does it apply to just fighter aircraft or do transport and trainers count as well? How does that impact IAF with such large number of 2 seat aircraft (Su-30s) which would make for a bulk of its airforce.

    in reply to: IAF news-discussion October-December 2007 #2469456
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    This thread is pure comedy … dont stop now please.

    As for, ‘…a non contributing forum members who continually spam threads with repeatedly discussed points again and again?’ … OMG what will I do! I must reply to this same question over and over again and prove my eshlongness … yada yada yada

    As far as I am concerned you dont need to keep reading the responses, questions or attempts at trolling … and def dont need to reply to them. So stop acting like babies … wait scratch that, cuz this is entertaining

    in reply to: Reliable enough to own? #2519000
    MohammedAli
    Participant
    in reply to: Pakistan reduces Ereyie contract #2519242
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    No need to IM me … I will detract my “light fighter” example with a medium fighter instead, as I was just using it as an analogy. How come India is not going on to develop its own fighter instead of trying to get an MRCA for the better part of this decade? After all, how many detailed briefings have the Indian officials have had on a variety of platforms!?
    My point basically is that it is a retarded line of thought to think PAF will cancel the deal with Saab just because they received all the information they needed from briefing by Saab and now China has that knowledge as well and will provide PAF with a copy cat solution!

    in reply to: How effective will it be (typhoon)? #2519409
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    Fitting thrust vectoring nozzles and related parts would shift the center of gravity on any aircraft. How is that change worked out in a design or are the changes more or so are restricted to the software side of flight controls?

    in reply to: Pakistan reduces Ereyie contract #2519413
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    I dont see how China can gather data for a briefing only certain PAF officials would have had from the Swedes regarding their AEW aircraft and its performance. And if they were able to do so, it must mean that either Chinese engineers are very very talented and at the same time their Indian counter parts are really really dimwitted. After all, Indians have had such briefings about all sort of military hardware from every aircraft manufacturer out there. Yet they are unable to make even a light fighter aircraft with sufficient performance to gain trust from their own air force.
    And I would like to see your source about any potential Hawkeyes coming from the States as free of charge? Also, since you seem privy to the contract between Saab and PAF, what exactly does that exit clause state? And as far as I remember, China was well on its way towards developing AEW capability by the time PAF had a chance to procure any of the systems available on the market.

    in reply to: Pakistan reduces Ereyie contract #2519732
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    That doesnt make any sense whatsoever

    in reply to: Pakistan reduces Ereyie contract #2519740
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    Right … and they learned everything meaningful from briefings! Makes perfect sense for conspiracy theorists. And since when was China briefed about the AEW’s performance?
    Aside from the Saab deal, nothing is yet concrete on paper. I doubt Pakistan will be getting any US made early warning aircraft.

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2522676
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    Apparently, PAF is not as worried about its planned aircraft acquisitions and force numbers as India is if one were to go by the latest article concerning dwindling fighter aircraft in IAF in the coming years that can be operational at any given time. In that scenario, given the size of two countries, Pakistan’s skies will be much better defended than India’s

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force #2530952
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    PAF doesnt use LANTIRN. For the MLU birds, there could always be a follow-up order for more Sniper pods

    MohammedAli
    Participant

    Couple of pics for UAEAF’s Block 60s. Cant remember where I got em from but the copyright info is on the images.

    in reply to: IAF News & Discussion Feb-Mar 07 #2533073
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    This is a little surprising as I had believed there were Indian/Israeli origin ECM/EW systems in the Su-30s. Does the Su-30s carry and podded ECM/EW equip or is it all carried internally since there should be no lack of space.
    This will definitely give an edge to an adversary

    in reply to: FC-1 Prototype 04: the Saga Continues #2537322
    MohammedAli
    Participant

    How is any of this useless discussion about the dynamics of sales to warsaw pact countries related to JF-17s thread?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 107 total)