For the first production LCA flew? Quick question on the previous TDs and PVs … has any of those prototypes flown with any external stores aside from the two dummy aams? I mean, after 658 some odd flights, how much longer till the fbw is fully tested? Or is the lsp-1 supposed to take over that function? How many +/- gs has the LCA been tested up to or is that info not available yet?

as far nuclear technology is concerned, a country only depends upon or get foreign technologies cant be a partner in ITER, they are not fool, they know what is the capabilities of partner countries. this is one example only…

i dont know how Russia comes in this discussion…they built some nuclear reactors for India as like US, Canada but what is the realtion of that with India’s nuke programmes….Do you know anything what you are talking about…just go to DAE,BARC,IIPR,TIFR websites, learn what they have developed, everything is public here….

and about russia “helping” india in Brahmos and Su-30, is it a back-door deal? or it voilates international rules??!! I dont have any question about JF-17. Brahmos is joint venture company of DRDO and NPO Mash, to jointly develop various versions of a supersonic cruise missile for army, navy and air force of both countries and for third countries.

But giving nuke and long range ballistic missile to a country which didnt even developed a bus engine indegenously (they do have long range ballistic missile but could not develop a SLV, why? because they cannot be used against India) In public, PRC giving every tech from ships(F-22P) to fighters (JF-17) with ToT but the other things……think yourself….anyway good strategy…..:D :rolleyes:

‘go QQ’ implies go cry some more, just fyi u know … wait you did that already.

UN! … MTCR! … go QQ some more

Would be better to have Italy build 20 or some odd 129s while production line is setup in Turkey. Even leasing from their Army could be an option.

Amrika must be giving them money like it does for everything military related in Pakistan right right

Isnt the primary role for the Taiwanese fighter anti-shipping? Aside from political aspects of the engine in FC-1, I think the question is in regards to performance, keeping everything else equal.
I would think some of our Chinese members would be more familiar with both types, but the general consensus from what I have read is that F-CK-1 is underpowered for its role. In terms of avionics/radar its anyones guess since PAF has not finalized its package. However, it has color MFD displays even in the Chinese version. Its radar is based on F-20 technology. F-CK-1 does have the benefit of better weapon integration so far, but again its been in service for 18 years almost.

Since all the Indians here know for sure that Babur is a Chinese missile in Pakistani colors, so to speak, kindly show my EVIDENCE to back up your claim specifically in regards to this cruise missile, else shut the hell up

Every Tom Nick and Harry and “USS Novice” amongst others will now want to flame this thread as they can’t stand going back to their gooky Indian threads and its trail of failures. I would like to invite independent viewers to just look at the bottom of the thread at any given time and the nicks that are spending time viewing this thread. Its really fun to see the inferiority complex. Grow up and grow out of your Freudian insecurities. 🙂

Couldnt have said it better myself