Quote of the entire post immediately above removed as unnecessary – Moggy
Hi AP,
Whilst you are totally correct with point 1,..cannot comment on your point 3.
I will have to correct you on Point 2, YES Supermarine did infact produce full production drawings for the T8 and T9. I cannot say if ‘all’ still exist but many hundreds of both 502 and 509 series drawings are held in the archive at RAF Hendon. The drawings covering all aspects, sheet metal detail parts, mods to existing structure, controls, systems, electrics etc. Mainly all fuselage related but also the wing fuel tank mods etc.
I do so like the ‘Make it fit and tell us later’ bit, sums up Spit construction totally!
Cheers, Chumpy.
..Phew some sensible answers at last!!!
OK this just in as I am sure you are all just dying to know, careful stripping of the paint has revealed that they were indeed originally painted black. (well done SteveP).
This then covered with yucky green then the blue, so top marks also to Jag and Moggy.
As you can see the ‘deco’ style logo beautifully sharp under the paint layers, we await the owners decision as to the final choice of colours. Had it been mine I think I would have left it as found, bit shabby-chic and all that!
Chumpy.
PS… As for Keith Newsome’s Health & Effciency example, should this not be bare metal???
I get the feeling that certain members are not taking this thread seriously!!…..It is in fact for real, the attached shot shows a genuine bit of the Castle Brom works.
The shy owner, plans to restore it and would like to get the colours correct. As you can see deep blue, once the faded surface is cut back. So does anyone know if there was a specific Vickers /Supermarine ‘house colour’?
I did check out the very excellent Putnam Guttering volume but alas no luck. For those interested in the subject I can recommend the recently published ‘Rogue Traders at War’ by Wayne Brickie.
This the little known story of the squads of highly untrained roofers that operated in occupied Europe during WW2, openly dislodging guttering and roof tiles then charging vast amounts to repair the damage.
Also mentioned is the Long Range Plumbing Group, driving far behind enemy lines often turning up some six hours late. One unfortunate Wehrmacht unit being charged some 5,000 Reichsmark just to change a tap washer!!
..Ill get my coat, Chumpy.
…yes I know the shade, will do you a 20 quid re-spray for £50,000. Just so long as your ‘friend’ pays cash!!!:rolleyes:
[QUOTE=old shape;1312073][QUOTE=chumpy;1312033]
I’d be interested to know a present design with a dimpled fastener, and I would also like to see the spec. docs for reference. I’m not doubting you, I have never worked on or seen such.
Hi there,
Hmm dimples and current designs, I can but quote the DHC Dash-8. I spent many ‘happy’ years at GKN Westland working on the D-8 engine nacelle programme, horrified to look back and realise it was 1990!! Also at the time similar dimpling of Shorts 360 wing sections. Today I work elsewhere however the Dash-8 contract continues at GKN, as far as I know still done pretty much the same.
As previously stated still much dimpling to be found in the vintage / light aircraft sector, the only way to acheive flush rivets on skins that are too thin for a ‘cut’ countersink.
As for specs etc the various companys had they own techniques / processes. In the case of GKN a large floor standing, pneumatic machine was used. This fitted with electrically heated male / female dies, of various sizes. Pressure, temp, dwell-time varied according to the material being dimpled. ( The D-8 being a combination of light-alloy and Titanium parts).
The skins came with the holes drilled and carefully deburred, usally no probs with cracks. Seem to recall a test piece had to be done for each batch, these closely looked at by the inspection dept.
The machine was operated by foot switch, the part to be dimpled located on the spigot of the male-die. Every now and again I missed the hole, hit the switch..this resulted in the machine punching a hole through the part in question…my foreman was NOT ammused!!
Dimpling can also be acheived by the method mentioned by Pongo..slower but safer!!
Chumpy.
Hi Dusty, Not quite what you are after, but maybe of interest all the same. Scans from a 1948 vintage Prentice brochure..variations on the Percival ‘****e-hawk’!!
Cheers, Chumpy.
[QUOTE=old shape;1311992][QUOTE=pogno;1311823]
In 35 years messing with A/c and military equipment I’ve never seen dimpled skins on an A/c. I’ve seen it on vehicles and trains. The dimpling is a metal deforming process which is bound to induce cracks, so I doubt if that practice is used today….but we are talking olde worlde days of Historic A/c. I stand to be corrected.
Dimples not used today!!!….you should get out more.:)
Still a lot of it about, both in old and new aircraft, no does not normally induce cracks.
Cheers Chumpy.
The two-seater idea has indeed been dropped, this was known as the ‘Solent-Spitfire’ project. The idea of the then owner of Sandown airport to own and operate a Spit as a tribute to the many company’s and people in the Solent area associated with the aircraft.
Although project had strong local support, the necessary funding to acquire and rebuild RW382 was not forthcoming. Thus the aircraft remained in storage until recently acquired by a new owner.
Chumpy.
…..RR232 that one was finished quite a while ago, currently back with it’s owner.
….Next up G-PBIX!!!
Hi there Oz,
Nice bit of detective work on your part!
..Glad to see it was won by a decent sort of chap, double barreled name, London ‘gentlemans’ club address etc. Thought he would have read the Times, a friend of the Sketch’s proprietor perhaps!!
Cheers, Chumpy.
TE477 – I located this via Google. We seem to have discussed this before.
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/archive/index.php?t-22339.html
Many thanks Mark, you had me worried for a moment!!
Chumpy.
I wish some of today’s enthusiasts would take such clear details at airfields…
Yes indeed a very detailed bit of work, fascinating to look back at the way it was 50+ years on. Must have been rather tricky to log all those details serials codes etc, in the heat of an airshow so to speak.
On the same day the ‘author’ had a bit of a ‘south coast bash’ enroute to Ford. Places visited included Christchurch..Thorney Island…Tangmere..Fleetlands..RNAS Gosport and Lee on Solent..oh what fun!!!
Also listed is ‘RAF Titchfield’ a new one on me, (just googled it) so now I know!..To be seen here was Spitfire XVI ‘6820M’ (ex TE477), bet Mk12 will tell us what happened to it..and post a photo!!
Cheers, Chumpy.
..Another one from Ford 1954 Sea Balliol WL719. Also from the same author one of Firefly VT429 this taken at Yeovilton 1956, didn’t young lads have great fun back then..not a risk assemment in sight!!
Wht an amazing flying display programme, The RATOG take off by six Fireflys must have been something else to witness! Did you get any pics of that?
I’m guesing the Gannets were part of 703X sqn Intensive Flying Trials Unit who were based at Ford, formed only three months prior to the show, they were responsible for getting the type into front-line service.
Hi Pagen, Alas no did not get any photos of this as I was not there..wish I had been!!
The Gannets indeed were from 703X sqn…scan of the notes that I have relating to the show. Alas just like yourself can but close my eyes and imagine what it must have been like.
Chumpy.
Brian, Happy to be of service, oh to have been there etc.
My only claim to fame re the Wyvern was being very lucky to have sat in the cockpit of the FAA museum example about 15 years back.. What a beast of a machine!