Sadly ‘MGW’s surviving section is smaller even than when recovered: a few years ago, someone offered to restore it, removed sections and did little else. The removed sections suffice to say were not returned.
It’s also a valid point regarding the Japanese Marathons. However, as with many thousands of other aircraft, people rarely record the scrapping of redundant airframes (or where any surviving bits go). I suspect that most/all of these aircraft were too far gone for anything to survive.
But one should never say ‘never’!
hi,
…remember one time seeing the Blackbird doing touch and go’s…
Ditto at Manston a number of times!
It’s becoming a real worry the amount of airfields closing. On the one hand I suppose Mildenhall’s closure is part of the peace dividend (is it still called that?), but the world seems less safe these days…
For non-load bearing parts, excellent. Beyond that I can see where questions would arise.
Already being done! As with all aircraft parts, drawing/manufacturing standards have to be adhered to, and part traceability and manufacturer approval is required, but no difference there to a ‘standard’ item.
3D printing is already used in aircraft manufacture, and is not so expensive as imagined. You can print many items within one ‘run’, and assuming there is a need/market for these items, then it’s incredible what can be made within one finite printing volume. Printing parts inside one another (making sure they can be separated after printing!) is feasible, and waste/finishing is minimal.
It’s an exciting development and as with most technologies, the cost and trickle-down to other areas is inevitable.
Perfect! Many thanks to all.
I’m comparing it to other contemporary engines for a book sidebar, and I have various figures for all (inches would be accurate enough), but not the length of the Falcon. Since the dimensions I have for the other engines do not include the boss/drive shaft, I need similar dimensions for the RR engine.
I’m not close to Old Warden but in the absence of a definitive answer I’ll consult the GA’s at the National Archives next time I’m up there.
Well this thread well and truly drifted. I was interested when the discussion was running to PBY’s etc still earning their keep, but since the topic was (supposedly) WW2-era, I can’t see any point discussing anything post-1945.
So can we have a go again?
As a kick-starter, does anyone know if P-51s are still being subcontracted for US (Navy?) test pilot training?
I’d have thought ‘Doc’ would feature high on anyone’s list. Close to flight too.
No mention of the BE.2c – is it still there? And I fully agree with Moggy C’s comments – some great exhibits were in the IWM (and hopefully still are), and many of these impressive items are not remotely aviation-related.
I’m planning a visit, or possibly two this year to the re-vamped version. Re-visits do however depend on whether the archives are still accessible.
I think there was a book covering ths very subject. Don’t forget the Pongos either!
There are thousands of RAF-isms, though many are not for family viewing. The one that always made me laugh was ‘Betty Windsor’s Flying Circus’, referring to TQF.
The small lettering is standard stencilling, “This machine must not be flown without passenger or equivalent weight in gunners cockpit”. Similar wording on RE.8s too.
Bristol Bulldog.
but it is not a real Spitfire…..
Well duh. Most of them aren’t.
Nice one: is the Vulcan shot recent? No snow down south here 🙁
I suspect it’s something that requires a bit more research than just the odd lazy bit of Googling. Nationality and manufacturer would obviously help, then a case of trawling through whatever archives remain regarding ‘paper’ projects for each manufacturer.
It’s equally possible that it’s just a concept with no model number, but there are enough special features on the model to make it look a bit more than just an item of whimsy.
Sadly I don’t have a clue where you’d start to look. But I’m pretty sure your answer doesn’t lie with Google.