dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,591 through 1,605 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AIR files at the National Archive #883814
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Search before you go on the TNA ‘Discovery’ tool: no need for those old paper index books!

    in reply to: AIR files at the National Archive #884034
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Despite an assertion by the National Archives that WW1 diaries would be available on-line, it isn’t quite that way at the moment: coverage is patchy, and in any case (and including WW2 and more recent ORB’s), the only on-line coverage is generally restricted to AIR 27: therefore I’d alwsays recommend a visit to Kew, to make sure all corners are covered. Depending on what you’re looking for, there are often nuggets to be had in the lesser AIR files, as well as WO, AVIA etc.

    in reply to: Suspicious Crashes In WW2 #884297
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Isn’t this fun.

    Nope. “Lacking in imagination” was the term that sprung to my mind.

    in reply to: AIR files at the National Archive #884660
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    The AIR files (ORB’s) are either on microfilm (easy access/no need to order) or available as the original ORB. In the latter case you can order them when you get there, and it’s usually only a 30-minute (max) wait before they turn up in your cubby hole.

    Get there early to renew your ticket though, as it does get busy in there!

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #891387
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    In the next three weeks there MUST surely be the opportunity for an overfly, and do the ‘Three Lancaster’ spectacle for maybe the last ever time.

    A bit melodramatic perhaps? Soon there’s got to be the possibility of doing a 3-ship flypast over a fourth, static Lanc!

    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Funny thing I could of been killed by a Luftwaffe bomb in the UK, in 1976.

    …or even could have?

    in reply to: RAF Worthy Down #902012
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Depends on what you’re looking for, but have you tried the National Archives?

    in reply to: Swordfish for display at Manston in future? #904033
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    It was repainted in either 2012/13 in the scheme below. I’m sure I read that the markings have some connection with Manston

    512th FIS from Bentwaters. 512th was parented by 406th FIW, which was based at Manston, but it’s just a shame they didn’t paint it as a Manston-based T-33; similar scheme too!

    in reply to: Swordfish for display at Manston in future? #904898
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Might be nice to see their T-33 painted as a Manston aircraft, but it ain’t going to happen!

    in reply to: Help needed to identify aircraft from a piece of wreckage #906772
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Well from the uni-head rivets and domed screws, I’d say it’s from something slow-moving. Skyhawk seems unlikely, based on colour alone. I know Heinemann designed his stuff a bit agricultural, but I’d be pretty sure it’s all flush-rivetted on an A-4.

    in reply to: 6 AOS Staverton Anson Colours #928481
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Not sure if it’s of use, but Anson N5254 of No.6 AOS at Staverton crashed near Headington, Wilts (near Calne) on 10th March 1943. There were photos on this forum a while back, though the aircraft appeared to bear no special markings to identify it as a 6 AOS machine.

    For info, Sgt Harold Naylor Jackson (one of the trainee navigators) was injured in the accident, with fellow trainee Sergeant K Middlemiss uninjured. Can’t locate pilot details as yet. The aircraft was on a cross-country flight when at 4.40 pm it developed engine trouble. Descending through the cloud the pilot just brushed a hill top (probably the hill that rises above the ‘Ivy’ pub in Headington) and he managed to forced land in a field near the village.

    in reply to: RIAT Fairford – Meh #930517
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Unfortunately there just aren’t the modern aircraft types or money to bring them to the UK that their used to be.
    As to the queues getting out. I can remember having to queue 2 hours just to get in! Not to mention just as long for the portaloos 🙂

    Yes – but in those days we had more interesting stuff to look at, so we didn’t use the loos and put up with the queue to get in.

    And I see that Greenham really is a common now. Sort of sad, but life goes on.

    in reply to: RIAT Fairford – Meh #930518
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I looked up Meh in the OED. Its actually in there. Its an expression of a lack of interest popularised by the Simpsons. So, does the use of that word in any way change the meaning of what you wrote in your first post? and what’s the connection between the quote of mine and what you typed beneath it in post 14. I’m sorry, I just dont get it.

    Whoopsie. Senior moment: meant to quote this post:”Oh, and isn’t ‘meh’ a little modern for this forum?”

    Make sense now?

    in reply to: RIAT Fairford – Meh #930529
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Mmm, I’m sure all the modern military fans would be absolutely thrilled by the idea of having ‘their’ big show hijacked by the vintage fraternity. NOT!

    LOL (said tongue firmly in cheek): I’m old enough to have kids who regularly use the term ‘meh’, along with many others, far less suitable for this forum! Glad this has prompted some lively discussion too!

    And yes, I loved the C-45 also.

    in reply to: The Helicopter Museum update . Addition to collection #863417
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Seasprite?

    Dammit I was going to say that!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,591 through 1,605 (of 1,675 total)