dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WIX/Warbird Information Exchange offline again? #724412
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Can anyone help? I’m having trouble accessing the Warbird Internet Exchange website. Not sure what the issue is but it only affects WIX at present. I’m now getting an “SQL error” message. Any help gratefully received.

    in reply to: WIX/Warbird Information Exchange offline again? #724557
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Why the references to American and Canadian? I’m just trying to access the site…????

    in reply to: WIX/Warbird Information Exchange offline again? #724572
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I’ve been trying to access it for a few weeks, so my issue doesn’t seem to be just a few days’ worth. I’ve tried on another laptop and also my mobile but none of them can access the site.

     

    Does the ‘heavily US orientated’ part relate to access outside of the USA?

    in reply to: WIX/Warbird Information Exchange offline again? #724584
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Seems to be offline again: anyone use it?

     

    I’m not sure why the site seems so unstable, but after several years of persevering with it, nothing seems to have changed.

    in reply to: TIGHAR wants final say-so on ANY Earhart expeditions #724631
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I can’t believe that after all we’ve been through, all we’ve observed and despite nothing of any value having been produced, someone has the gall to kick this crap off again with a statement so preposterous as, “I’ve always appreciated TIGHAR for its work to test the hypothesis that Earhart and Noonan landed on Nikumaroro…..”

     

    It’s like discussing Gary Glitter’s charity work.

     

     

    in reply to: At the risk of boring everyone…..Amelia… #724894
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Nothing seems to be getting through. Yet more Google copy/paste, and yet more pointless clutter.

    in reply to: Maid of Harlech #724925
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Fly replicas: preserve the original. You can have both.

     

    But what we see is wanton destruction; you wouldn’t expect it of Stonehenge (let’s finish it off and maybe stone clad it while we’re there?) but for some reason we are sleep-walking into this constant, repeated process with warbirds.

     

    What we also see is a constant process of gaslighting and deliberate obtuseness to try and create a narrative about warbirds not being able to fly anymore. No-one’s ever said that, but any time you bring up the subject of destruction of artefacts you get the same deliberately-missed-the-point reply.

     

    And these aircraft arguably belong to all of us; warbird owners should buy into the notion that they are custodians of our heritage. But money talks, and by the time people wake up, it will be too late for many.

    in reply to: Has TIGHAR gone dark? #724933
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    You only need to observe how many churches function in the USA to realize how TIGHAR has gotten away with so much and for so long. 

    in reply to: Maid of Harlech #725107
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    “What part of “protected, nobody can lay a finger on it” don’t people understand?”

     

    Just look at the many, many historic airframes that have been scrapped so that their data plate can be stuck on something else. For some reason our historic aircraft are only worth that: a data plate. I wouldn’t be surprised to find that someone has stolen it already. The warbird community can be a despicable place.

    in reply to: Still more of TIGHAR's Earhart "evidence" – isn't #725150
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    “Crashed and sank” wouldn’t justify a holiday each year though: that would be admitting that you don’t have a chance of finding anything. So if you dismiss the crashed and sank idea (with no evidence whatsoever) then you can justify spending cash on going somewhere nice.

     

    And on the basis that you’re making up any hypothesis you like, you can pretty much decide exactly where you want to go. It’s a nice little earner 🙂

    in reply to: Still more of TIGHAR's Earhart "evidence" – isn't #725405
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    On the subject of TIGHAR, I doubt any of us really know what we’re talking about. They haven’t really done anything except go on holiday and shout a lot. 

     

    It’s debatable whether TIGHAR should even be a subject of discussion on a serious historic aviation forum!

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725412
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Agree fully on the ‘caution’ approach. I’ve visited Kew many, many times researching WW1, WW2 and Cold War subjects. I often get side-tracked onto totally unrelated things because when you order a box of documents it often contains material that’s unrelated to your search. I always think I’ve finished looking but then need another trip because I’ve found something else. Plus it is pretty incredible when you find that you’re handling a document signed by Churchill, or Dowding or Beamont.

     

    My approach with these things is usually to look at Kew for the ORB etc (I’ve also done a lot of personnel research there pertaining to WW1), then see what that says. Next take a trip to the RAF Museum and see what the aircraft record cards say; I have also done a lot of flying log book research at Hendon: they have an amazing collection. Then that usually ties it all in – official record/aircraft/people. Hendon’s cataloguing system is incredible: if you get the staff to search for “Hampstead Norris” you will likely find they can locate photographs too, as well as personal items related to the airfield. And the staff are extremely knowledgeable and helpful. They too are OK with you taking photos. Back in the day (pre-digital) I’d be scribbling away for hours, just making notes as much as I could: technology has made a world of difference there.

     

    I have to say I don’t know much about O&RTU – the parts I have were merely background info for a crash I was researching in Wiltshire. Luckily I keep copies of everything I photograph at Kew (thank goodness for digital cameras), so sometimes I can help others with a bit of primary-source data. Sadly on this occasion I’m missing the bits that would tell the full story, but hopefully others will be able to start where I finished.

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725419
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    AIR 29/587 is a primary-source document from the National Archives; it’s the O&RTU ORB. Hence, it was written contemporaneously with the unit’s day-to-day activity, by a member of the unit. 

     

    Information posted on books and websites should always be taken with caution, but for many nowadays it counts as “research”. It’s not.

     

    Take a trip to Kew: it’s a treasure trove of primary-source documents which often contradict what you’ll read when you Google something.

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725633
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    No-one claimed that O&RTU at Thruxton were supporting D-Day but that is misleading; GPRs were training for ‘something’, whether it was D-Day or not.

     

    It seems that O&RTU’s presence at Thruxton will be dismissed since it doesn’t agree with the narrative. I’ll leave it to someone else to ‘discover’ that part in the future.

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725718
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I’ve double checked; I only have a few pages from AIR 29/587 but Operational & Refresher Training Unit was in existence at Thruxton as early as December 1943. CO at that time was Sqn Ldr P Taplin.

     

    I am missing intervening sheets but the unit is present at Hampstead Norris on 1 March 1944, so the “1 April 1944 forming at Hampstead Norris” is in error.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 1,675 total)