dark light

Sabrejet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,675 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725723
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    FYI the correct spelling is “Albemarle” – only one ‘r’.

     

    I’ll have to double-check the Thruxton link to O&RTU: it seems to have pre-dated the 1 April 1944 date.

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #725733
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    There is a very useful timeline in that link: it shows a 1 April 1944 formation of 1 O&RTU though I’d suggest that should be ‘moved from Thruxton’.

     

    I’m sure there must be markings experts out there who could pin down a unit for those Albemarles either way.

    in reply to: This Forum #726001
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I’m just amazed at the amount of sleepers being nudged back into life. Maybe there is hope after all….

    in reply to: Tail-heavy Albermarles #726188
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    These look like scrappers to me, rather than ‘stored’. And yes, engineless.

     

    I’m not sure of Hampstead Norris’ WW2 history but I’m aware of the place since I used to drive past on my daily commute to/from Benson.

     

    I also did a small bit of research into it in relation to a crash elsewhere; though not mentioned in the ever-dodgy Wiki entry, the airfield was home to the ambiguously-titled “Operational & Refresher Training Unit”, which moved in from Thruxton circa February 1944. This unit was glider-related and later had Albemarles, which may be those seen in your photo, presumably awaiting the cutting torch in post-war years.

     

    For info, a February 1944 return for O&RTU showed this:

    Horsa I – LF941

    Hotspur II – BT576, BT667, BT671, BT739, BT775, BT780, BT920, HH372, HH705, HH791, HH838

    Whitley V – LA790, LA872; Whitley ‘293/P’ is also mentioned.

    The return also shows Tiger Moth hours being flown though the aircraft is not listed.

    in reply to: One of our Stirlings has finally returned home #726225
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Wow. Would it be possible to incorporate these sections into the greater whole and not lose their markings, patina etc?

    in reply to: This Forum #726229
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Tongue-in-cheek I hope. The world already has too many daft conspiracy theories.

    in reply to: Iraqi F-86's #726709
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Iraq, not Iran. Five F-86Fs supplied from storage in France, ferried by USAF pilots. They were grounded in Iraq soon after their arrival and never made it elsewhere.

    in reply to: Can anyone identify the aircraft type in this wreckage? #726767
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    An educated guess: something like a Fairchild 71 maybe?

    in reply to: Supermarine Scimitar canopy at auction. #727394
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    There were LOADS of these at Flowers Yard in Chippenham just before it closed; I remember putting somebody right at the time who said they were ex-Sabre so it’s a shame that myth seems to have persisted. I suspect this is a Chippenham example too. There was a Scimitar cockpit there too: don’t know if it survived, though it deserved to.

    in reply to: Road Running Shorts Tucanos #727577
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Horner’s Tucano was ex-ZF206.

    in reply to: Road Running Shorts Tucanos #727633
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Nothing mysterious at all: there are a lot of Tucanos for sale and/or on the US register. I’d imagine these heading the same way.

    in reply to: Marting P6M SeaMaster #727827
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    I suspect that new-build/new design amphibian water bombers are under consideration as we speak. Not so long ago there wouldn’t be so much urgency for this type of aircraft but with the escalation in climate-related wildfires (Jasper being just one high-profile example) availability of this type of aircraft must now be a high priority. Imagine what could be done if it were an optimised design, incorporating the latest technology and the best engines and airframe. I’m sure that even the way water is uploaded would benefit from a new set of eyes and some real investment. 

    in reply to: Marting P6M SeaMaster #728010
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Mariner? I thought we were talking Seamaster??

    in reply to: Royal Air Force Station Halton 1959 Film #728362
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Posted in the Beaufighter Classroom thread a couple down. 

    in reply to: Earhart Festival doesn't feature TIGHAR #728530
    Sabrejet
    Participant

    Makes perfect sense: it sounds like a serious event. Joke turns are unlikely to be welcome.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 1,675 total)