dark light

Shorty01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 662 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: EE Canberra – Post your Pictures here #1199344
    Shorty01
    Participant

    A few from the IAT late 80’s, early 90’s. The orange one I believe was a German research aircraft.

    in reply to: Armstrong Whitworth Ablemarle #1209082
    Shorty01
    Participant

    Whilst we are at it, are there any good books with details (pictorial) of the Albemarle available ?

    I need more detail for the Blender model I’m working on (below).

    in reply to: Spitfire – 'Data plate specials' #1173716
    Shorty01
    Participant

    I’m intrigued by the quoted number of current Spitfires extant, 220. Some years ago Flypast did a survey of all survivors and concluded that the grand total of survivors was 147. That gives an increase of 50% in the last 10 to 15 years. Having only missed a few issues of Flypast ( my main source of info before the internet) since Issue 2 it hasn’t been apparent that substantial remains of Spitfires have been emerging from the bushes etc., at a rate of at least four a year. I can only surmise that a large portion of the new ones are Data Plate Specials. Am I correct ?

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1175785
    Shorty01
    Participant

    Thanks TwinOtter, just wondered.

    in reply to: Aircraft Cockpit Sections/Instrument Panel Projects #1176307
    Shorty01
    Participant

    I was wondering about the state/progress of the “forum” shackleton nose section. Any news ??

    in reply to: Why can't UK build it's own aircraft? #2494654
    Shorty01
    Participant

    I don’t believe that it is possible for a single country to develop a competitive frontline fighter. The cost is too great and most of the major players are multinational concerns, all those UK based are anyway.

    Spreading the work across several nations is not necessarily a major hinderance. It can cause difficulties but generally no worse than having several manufacturing plants in different parts of the countries. I’ve worked in both scenarios. Rivalries did exist but that occurred in both instances.

    Even if an aircraft is “indigenous” it will most definitely have components outsourced to suppliers in other countries. These components are usually selected as to which best meet the procurement specification, schedule and cost (I’m speaking on experience on commercial programmes here). Though interestingly enough a lot of people are avoiding procuring US parts if possible due to the current ITAR issues which can be a serious hinderance.

    “UK doesn’t have the ability”, We have the skills, it’s just we get paid better going to other countries, it’s cheaper there, get better social status there and the weather is usually better.

    Does anyone actually need a major fighter design in the foreseeable future ? Where is the major threat in the emerging global economy ? We can’t fight each other anymore on a large national scale because it would have too much effect on our collective investments. OK, maybe that is wishful thinking.

    PATRIOTIC RANT TIME

    Star49 wrote “And aerospace includes Space Industry and services which UK has none”.

    errr…. I beg to differ as the UK Space industry has paid my wage for 14 of the last 18 years since graduating, 6 and a half years spent on the indigenous Skynet 4 program.

    We (UK) produce Spacecraft structures, Payloads, Science instruments, Control systems, Complete spacecraft and Ground control systems and Operations services amongst others.

    If you want to get historic major high lights are we launched our own satellite (Prospero) on our own launcher (Black Arrow) in 1971. OUR ICBM “Blue Streak formed the first stage of the first Europa launchers, predecessors to Ariane. The Skylark suborbital launcher or “Sounding Rocket” had 441 launches. I could go on….

    This however emphasises the problems we UK Aerospace Engineers have. No public perception of our existence/achievements really exists. We don’t sell ourselves properly and the media helps ensure that everyone thinks Space & Aviation is done by the US/China/Russia & maybe the French. All major films about aviation are US based. When was the last UK film about daring contempary British aviators ? I believe this is where the US and France, amongst others succeed. It is a nations attitude towards the various sectors of it’s commerce & industry that counts a lot. These desires/prejudices are deep routed and do affect national policy which is why a country the size of France can do it. They want it and they care about it.

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1220665
    Shorty01
    Participant
    in reply to: Wanted Ideas For Replica Build… #1234221
    Shorty01
    Participant

    How about an Arrow Active, quite small, only two built, one of which caught fire on Alex Henshaw who had to leave it quickly via parachute. Lots of metal work though.

    Another idea is the Hordern-Richmond Autoplane. A small twin co-designed by Freddie Richmond, grandfather to the current Lord March of Goodwood fame. You may even get free entry to the Goodwood revival & they may let you keep it on the airfield.

    Shorty01
    Participant

    This crash was from the first episode when the aircraft took off with the undercarriage safety pins were left in. The RAF crew were carrying contraband and rushed the preflights when the MPs turned up. It took off, was heavy and failed to clear the house because of the drag from the U/C.

    The Ice crash was a lot later in the series when a Ruskins airlines C47 hit a snow bank after an aborted take off due to ice.

    in reply to: Mark I mustangs #1173116
    Shorty01
    Participant
    in reply to: BA 777 Emergency Landing Short of Runway at LHR #560293
    Shorty01
    Participant

    Being totally ignorant of the finer points of flying a large commercial airliner and not having an airliner flight sim to try this on, would there be any point in this situation in raising the gear to reduce drag and extend the glide if you’re not going to make the field ? would lack of power preclude the hydraulics from being capable of this ? might even reduce damage to the airframe.
    Apologies for my ignorance, the biggest thing they let me fly on my own was a K13 glider, no electrics or hydraulics to go wrong.

    in reply to: he111 zwilling #1300940
    Shorty01
    Participant

    Oops.. Italeri model Me 323.

    Wonder if they ever tried winch launching the Me321 ?:eek:

    in reply to: he111 zwilling #1301061
    Shorty01
    Participant

    Interesting film of a Gigant in flight on youtube.

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=6e639Ec9lsQ

    Used to have the Heller model of the Me323, monster wingspan at 1:72.

    in reply to: Recovering Aircraft from Russsia #1242073
    Shorty01
    Participant

    You could try the Hunt brothers who have retrieved a few things from Russia.

    See

    http://www.huntaircraftrecovery.com/

    in reply to: Ultra-Low at Airshow #1253872
    Shorty01
    Participant

    Yes, that was a bit hairy and he was close to spreading himself across the airfield, BUT was he endangering the crowd/public ?? The scary bits seem to be flying away from the crowdline. He doesn’t fly over the crowd either. I’m not sure where the bits would have gone if he had smeared it across the grass but it looks fairly clear, maybe have a look at Google earth.

    I wouldn’t compare the A310 to the A320. The A320 was the worlds first production FBW airliner. The A310 is a lot older.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 662 total)