Not completely selfless Janie, I get to do some of the flying.
It does worry me that some of the youngsters miss out on historic aviation. I know it’s not everyones thing. I once had a guy in his twenties sit next to me on the tube whilst I was reading Flypast a while back. He seemed fascinated by the fact that people restored & operated old aircraft & had never really appreciated this sort of thing went on.
WRT the lottery policy, whilst being a pain, I suppose it sort of makes sense in the grand scheme of things. I scanned in a lot of my old negatives going back to about 1985 & it was quite depressing to see the number of aircraft not around any more due to accidents. Apart from the tragic loss of life, that’s alot of public money out of the window. Can you imagine the press if XH558 got funded by the lottery & went sliding off the end of the runway at Duxford due to loss of control having ingested some of Germaine Greers’ geese on final approach. Oh Chr*st !
Umm…I like the first shot especially. So, how exactly did you get it ?
I get spoilt with views of D-AQUI from my office window most weeks as Frankfurt Main is 20 miles up the road. It came chugging over my flat at about 500 feet the weekend before last. Lovely to see it from inside.
How about setting up an air experience scheme for underpriviledged or ill kids to give them a taste of flying that they might not otherwise get. Keep it topped up with lottery money etc.. Show youngsters planes aren’t just big aluminium tubes you go on holiday in.
Get some more economic historics like moths in on the act. I had a go in a work colleagues’ Queen Bee, LF858, a few years ago. Superb, something like that would definately make an impression.
Right, if this doesn’t work, i’m going to bed.
Ah !! finger trouble, meant to post this one.
Are you sure they hadn’t shoved old oil bottles up the exhausts like they do at my local flying club? I was told this was to catch the leaking oil but I’m not so sure how much would leak out of the exhausts if any and whether this would be an effective way of catching it. It’s more likely to stop furry things getting in there. We have a Marder (German ferret/pine marten) problem around here. They’ed have to be pretty acrobatic though. See below. (Yes, I know it’s a slightly different Yak)
I’m just south of Frankfurt. Don’t know what it was today. T’was 42 deg C in the sun, 37.5 in the shade yesterday. I’m now doing my Lobster impression.
I’m just south of Frankfurt. Don’t know what it was today. T’was 42 deg C in the sun, 37.5 in the shade yesterday. I’m now doing my Lobster impression.
Not West Malling at the airshow in 1985 is it ?
Only went to West Malling once, 1985. My First outing to an airshow with a BIG (SLR) camera. It rained and rained a lot then, a bit like Belgium really.
Well, if I become rich (ha, ha) I’ll get an A-26 and you can all have a go.
umm..am I missing something, owning an airworthy spitfire and NOT flying it !! What’s the point ?
I think you are right about the Viscount here.
Do Zeppelin windows count here ?
The comet window problems were to do with shape of apertures in the fuselage skin, not the size. They had “sharp” corners which caused stress concentrations leading to fatigue as the fuselage flexed. Pressurised airliner cabins were new then, mind you there was that unfortunate spectacular Aloha Airways incident in which the Stewardess sadly died when a large portion of the cabin roof disappeared. I believe that was attributed to the high number of cycles the aircraft had and the associated pressurisation/depresurisation, something like 20,000 cycles. Legend has it that the only thing that saved the aircraft was the extra strength given to the floor by the seat rails. Can anyone confirm this ?
Remember this was 1988/89. What did happen to Air Uk ?
BC,
I shot these on a Canon D60 (6.3 mega pixel) with 28-105 lens. The files were set to max jpeg resolution which usually gives you a hefty pic of about 2.5 to 4.0 megabytes depending on detail. I also use a canon EOS300 for film which I scan in to give a similar size picture. I then use Photoshop Limited Edition 5.0 as supplied with the D60 & also the scanner.
I have experimented with various ways of reducing the files to an acceptable size whilst maintaining quality. It would appear that to retain sharpness you need to reduce the size of the picture by fractions that are easy for the software to “extrapolate” or divide up the pixels. e.g reduce it to a 1/4 or 1/8.
So a 1280x 800 picure would be reduced by 1/4 to 320×200, therefore the software has a nice integer of 4 to divide everything by. I think that is how it works & it would appear to work most of the time.
You can also play around with the dpi of the image as well.
I then use the jpeg compression to further reduce the picture size. You can use the sharpen tool to get the sharpness back, but I do not like using this as it looks too false, though I did use it on the one of the unit badge under the cockpit.
Once saved, I do not close in the software package as it retains (& should in most other photo packages) the original compressed image unless you reopen the image from the directory. Check the file size in windows explorer. If the file is less than say the 100k for this forum, you can resave it at a lower compression (higher quality). Repeat this process until you get the file size you want, i.e. just under 100k. Only then close the photo you are editing.
One thing to note is that the amount of detail in the shot complicates the issue. The photos of the Danish Hunter were not to bad to reduce with the basic colour, the photo of the underside of the t-bird was a bit more of a challenge, that is why it is slightly smaller than some of the others.
HOWEVER, remember you can not uncompress a Jpeg. To avoid mistakes I have a master directory with all the originals, then have a working directory to store copies of the photos in for size manipulation etc.
Basically you need a methodical approach to experimenting with each of the variables to see how they effect quality. It is still a bit trial & error at times. Don’t give up though.
One thing, we are lucky on this forum, I go to a motorsport one that limits the size of the photos to 640×400.
ah, that’s all right for one pic, but some people manage multiple pics on one page. How ?