dark light

stuart gowans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,891 through 1,905 (of 1,986 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: OFMC spitfire mk xvi #1302693
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I have a sneaking suspicion that there is a touch of sarcasm R.e Sadsacks post, I can’t believe anyone, having seen an entire albums worth of song titles would then go for David Gilmour as the owner , surely if he were the owner it would be parked over in the dark side of the hangar, whilst he was learning to fly, etc etc ..( of course theres no dark side of the hangar ,its all dark)

    in reply to: i.d. help #1305040
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Rocketeer, didn’t realise you were into astronomy as well!

    in reply to: Bent props #1307903
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    The blades are still working when they touch the water, unless they are feathered, simply put they are pulling at the air in flight and continue to do so as they enter the water,it being denser than air, exerts a greater force on the blade than it can take resulting in the bend; the ground on the other hand isn’t just dense its plain hard! the blade reaches its critical point almost instantly, it has no chance to pull or claw at the ground and is forced back ,although marshy land by definition falls somewhere between the two ,and the wetter it is the more likely that the blade will get purchase on contact and bend forward. (of course I could be wrong!)

    in reply to: Ludham Tower. Des Res available. #1308955
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Had a look at Ludham tower yesterday; as Bruce says, not as good as it looks in the glossy brochure, and with a price tag of £100k not exactly a bargain as its only got pp for holiday use.

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology in the UK? #1312191
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Colin thanks for your reply; I have an eye witness to the removal of the engine, he clearly remembers it hanging from a JCB, do you know any of the “individuals” who might have dug this site ; did they have permission? Do you have any info on the A/C ,ie date crashed, fate of the crew

    in reply to: Aviation Archeology in the UK? #1314093
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Colin, Colin, Colin? (did you get through all right sir?)

    in reply to: RR Engine names. #1314566
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I know where the “Exe” goes (its generally accepted that it marks the spot!); however the Exe was a piston engine similiar to the Vulture, does this mean someone in Rolls-Royce had a sense of humour?

    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I think thats P & A Woods over at Dunmow; when you drive passed the premises you can see a shiny Merlin in the window; makes you want to ram raid the place!! (only kidding)

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1315754
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Yes , your all right!! Thanks to Mark G for his “concise” explanation ; I do know that the collective term is “an alarm of pikeys” (ies) as in an unkindness of ravens, or flock of seagulls…

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1315942
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    No takers on this one?… here we go then; having watched a channel 4 programe on a related topic (so it must be true) a nice gypsy lady said unto the interviewer that “pikeys” (not sure of the plural) were quarter bred (or threequarter bred depending on how you look at it) with Romanys as the pure line. Here in Essex we are less interested in their parentage, but are very concerned with the thieving sc*m that; pinch our power tools ,tear off with our trailers, dump in our driveways (quite literally) and clutter our countryside. Lucky heather anyone…

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1316365
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    You have the right to remain silent…I notice the sign didn’t sell, but undeterred its back on at the full price.

    in reply to: Firefly WB440 #1316371
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    £14K and he wont let the p*xy little trolley go with it…

    stuart gowans
    Participant

    R.e the discrepancies with the uniforms, could this photo be taken at a reunion, i.e some years later ,and maybe not even their A/C.

    in reply to: Undercarriage indicator,Spitfire ? #1317137
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    What could be more practical than a roller blind? I’ve got one in the bathroom ,works a treat! ( only jealous as I don’t have one!!)

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1318059
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Unfortunately if you were building almost any other A/C then much of what you say would hold true,but because you use the magic word $pitfire, then you enter this twilight world of speculation, “data plate ” rebuilds, hoarding (same as speculation really) , misappropriation , and even theft (out of the ground as well as peoples garages) . Its mostly down to money although the $pitfire evokes a lot of deep feeling in people, some just want a bit others want it all. Your last statement that “the community is too small for crooks to p*ss off too many people” doesn’t seem to ring true here in the UK ;almost every day I hear another story of how so and so has “done it again” most of us know who they are ,but those that are just getting started get a baptism of fire; in a previous post I used the expression “all that glitters is not gold” that refers to reproductions being passed off as genuine, often with a bona fide provenance!! theres good money in it. Not sure how the museum registration thing works where you are ,here in theory it ties up loose ends, in practice things still get misappropriated or stolen, often museum storage facilities are remote even off site and far less secure, and sadly much of what goes on is an inside job. I can understand peoples reservations re donating or loaning items, even if everything was above board there is still the risk of storm damage or fire , and any powered exhibit has the ability to destroy itself ,whats left then?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,891 through 1,905 (of 1,986 total)