dark light

stuart gowans

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 1,986 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aviation Archeology in the UK? #1318254
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Colin, could you refresh my memory, as to what A/C it was that was dug by your group in Ramsden ; as you probably remember I owned the field for about 10 years ,but that was after 2 seperate digs were undertaken, on one ocassion an engine was removed; is that with you at the fort? When I did make enquiries locally the only record of a downed plane was in Swan lane Wickford, although I’ve spoken to long time residents from the area ,no one seems to remember it; could the one from Ramsden be the same one ,(if it had carried on a bit further it would have ended up in Swan lane) I seem to remember it was a Heinkel

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1318689
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Apparently any man who defends himself in court has a “fool for a client” !! (courtesy of “Bradshaws giude to do it yourself conveyancing”)

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1318875
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Don,
    Get yourself an ex banksafe (its what I’ve got) the “Yahoos” or pikey scrotes (as I believe they are known as in Shropshire) wont be able to get in, and they are fire resistant , as I believe its not unheard of that certain persistant types will have a go with the oxy/acetylene.

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1320250
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    A large collection of 3-rail track, controllers and some rolling stock. I kept the engiones (about eight of them) separately 🙂

    They lasted another three or four years when they were stolen in a stable break-in by some pikey scrotes. 😡

    Moggy

    “pikey scrote” is that some east anglian colloquialism for a nare do well?

    in reply to: Ludham Tower. Des Res available. #1320260
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Does anyone know the name of the property auction company?

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1320838
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Of course some items are given because they think that the recipient is an enthusiast and he/she will look after them and get greater pleasure having them than theirselves; whereas the services give medals for achievements ,and are not bothered whether the recipient is an enthusiast, or will look after them etc etc. You can’t take away the achievement from someone just because they no longer have a physical reminder of the act. At the start of the thread, some were concerned that a valuable piece of history (possibly too valuable for one man to own) was being “flogged” fo purely financial gain; the discovery that the sign, was circa 1962 led some others to think it was worthless 60’s tat ,but even that is 44 years old, and whilst it may have only hung for 8 years outside Tangmere, it is still worthy of preservation.

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1321481
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    My advice is hang on to the stuff, put it in a glass cabinet in the spare room be proud that you have these items,as your son will one day (fortunately university cool doesn’t last forever,) and it will be his link to the past through you; My paternal grandfather was in the navy, (interwar) I don’t even have a photo of him , and as for my own father I dont have enough information to get his service record ,as you need either his last unit when demobbed or else his service no.

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1322575
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    As Ben says there are still quite a lot of museums that are not registered out there; even after ascention items may still be in dispute as owners may have had a prolonged illness, overseas posting, (services) custodial sentence, memory loss (alright probably not the las one!!) but an item thought to be on loan, that has been assimilated by the museum because it can’t return it to the owner, (because contact can’t be established) theoretically becomes the museums property, but can only be defined by a courtcase judgement (see Ben for details!!) I myself have purchased 2 items from the Tangmere collection (sold on ebay) I would love to buy the sign and would happily place it on loan, but I don’t think it will drop down to a price I can afford; the other aspect is that “all that glitters isn’t gold “(stairway to heaven?) and “my” Tangmere sign bearing the legeng “Station Headquarters” isn’t quite as old as I first thought! (either that or they were using vinyl stickers circa ww2!!)

    in reply to: Spitfire Replicas #1322793
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    My advice is “get a gun ,shoot yourself in the foot ,go home!” seriously though the biggest headache is sourcing parts; the eb@y thing is killing off any chances that up and coming “builders” might get to aquire original parts or even reproduction bits; it is sounding the death knell for aerojumbles and what is left is going to far flung places, that otherwise wouldn’t get a look in (which might be fair and even handed, but b*gger that, I need parts now!!).

    in reply to: eBay Alert – RAF Tangmere Sign #1323699
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Its Andy Saunders thats selling it !!

    in reply to: Spitfire Replicas #1324129
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    G B Replica’s is the name of the company making them currently; they get a lot of “interested” inquiries that taper off when the price remains firm; basically they are expensive (around £20k) if you really want one then you need to be persistant ; just a fuselage will probably be £10k plus, and inside they’re a bit of a shock! some of the older ones (piece of cake era) have lumps of box section steel where you might want to sit. The chaps name at GB’s is Stuart (is that the Stuart you were thinking of Ben?)

    in reply to: Speedy Spit. #1324349
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    cheers Daz

    That’s better – that’s how she should look – dark blue with a gold cheat line and no roundels(why are they called cheat lines????)

    Is it because of the way the lines were applied ? i.e straight over the finish underneath, instead of being masked up seperately, or else because they were used to tidy up the “join” where two different colours met, or is it the aviation equivalent of the “go faster stripe”..

    in reply to: Miles Monarch to be ejected from East Fortune Museum #1334870
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    What a shame that the Monarch is to be displaced.
    Still, the good news is that the secret master-plan for aircraft preservation to be limited to examples of the Vickers-Supermarine Concorde in Red Sparrows colours is gaining ground. Joe public will then be equally satisfied no matter which collection they live near and will have no incentive to visit other locations. That will cut down on the country’s petrol consumption. 😀

    Never a truer word spoken than in jest; Yes the “general public” does want it all on a plate, but you can undrestand why , for example I went passed the FAA museum the other day (on other business) but I, noted at the time I had been driving for 4 hours, so assuming that I got the family in the car at about 8 o/clock in the morning , we might be there for lunch, which gives us a couple of hours to look round before another 4 hours drive home; hardly relaxing! .East fortune is twice the distance from me (and for a lot of people) they do need something special to attract a significant no. of visitors;(whether its Concorde I can’t say), what is obvious is that museums located centrally within the country are the answer, and flying events ,that bring the A/C to you (figuratively speaking).

    in reply to: Cellulose paints #1335756
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    I used cellulose paint throughout the 80’s on refinishing cars, whilst its less durable in terms of fading, than a two pack system, it does offer the advantage that it wont kill you! (without a suitable air fed mask) Two pack has the unfortunate side effect of making everything it is sprayed onto ,look like a plastic replica (in full gloss) ,if a semi matt finish is required cellulose will probably do as well, as it loses some of its sheen under prolonged bright sunlight but doesn’t go white like oil based paints; if the A/C was going to be left outside like for example a gate guardian, then two pack would be ideal fo this, but if hangared when not flying, I would have thought that cellulose would give good service, its easier to apply (no hardener) , and you can govern the drying time by using fast or slow thinners as required. The other thing you can do with cellulose to give it extra sheen is to mix in blending clear with the last few coats ,this realy does work and seems to cut down the fading effect, although for some reason when using blending clear ,you do have to machine (or hand) polish it ,as it drys semi matt sometimes.

    in reply to: The First of the Few #1336289
    stuart gowans
    Participant

    Having listened to the “alternative” sound track I can only be grateful that it was rejected; the downbeat darker feel that it gives the film, would have caused any young boy playing with his meccano (in front of the telly) on a Sunday night, to have an early night and, as such it probably wouldn’t be discussed here now ,the true sound track by Ron Goodwin has inspired another generation (my son) all over again.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 1,986 total)