dark light

Palerider

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 111 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-14D's to replace F-111's in the interm? #2565384
    Palerider
    Participant

    To reply to this threads original question, while the F-14 is an interesting idea, replacing one old, maintenance intensive, complex swing wing platform with another just wouldnt make any sense, especially for an ‘interim’ period. There was a case for a small buy/lease of say 24 SH’s. That would of been ok as they are available/affordable (especially if leased from the USN) and at least have longer legs than the currnet Hornets and later could of been bought outright for conversion to EA-18’s for dedicated SEAD, something the RAAF lacks (although i think the RAAF F-18’s are wired for HARM, can anyone confirm?)
    However with the C-17 purchase, all the money is gone from the cookie jar so i think we can forget any interim fighter purchases. Besides the RAAF has put its (immediate) future in the F-18/P-3/JASSAM basket.

    in reply to: Smaller air forces: news, rumours and speculations #2565393
    Palerider
    Participant

    If that is the case then the Saudis are set on moving towards the Typhoon.

    It was reported just a few months ago (Jane’s, AFM, etc.) that Saudi Arabia was in negotiations with the Eurofighter consortium to specifically replace the Tornados with orders for Typhoons.

    Seems the Saudi Typhoon deal could have a couple of flow on effects, Typhoons to Morocco, F-5’s to Indonesia. I read in AFM that Morocco made an offer to supply surplus F-5’s to the TNI-AU, which makes sense now if the Tornado deal pans out.

    in reply to: AEW Islander ZG989 #2570116
    Palerider
    Participant

    While on the subject of AAC Defenders any opinions as to why the 3 new BN2T-4S use the AL.1 designation? My knowledge of BN-2’s (apart from flying in one here in oz in the ’70’s) isnt exactly comprehensive but aren’t the -4S models longer & more powerful than the original AL.1’s thus warranting a designation change? (AL.2?)

    in reply to: Fleet's time is up, says Nelson #2573316
    Palerider
    Participant

    Because the initial 12 are for the Army but will be capable of operating from the Navy’s amphibs.

    Daniel

    I think that statement is at the heart of the matter. When the MRH-90 deal was announced i noted in the fine print that it was mentioned that the helo’s were capable of maritime ops. Hmmm i thought (call me a cynic) what a good way for the ADF to save money, retire the Sea Kings and claim the MRH-90’s can fill the role (which im sure they can but more than 12 are needed considering its meant to be an Army S-70 replacement as well). But given the MRH-90 in service date is a way off (with any additional purchases further away) and the near mutiny over continued Sea King ops, we may see a small buy (6-8?) of the MH-60’s for Navy utility/SAR roles with the heavier roles (amphib. assault etc) being handled by Army MRH-90’s.

    in reply to: Jordanian AF Ecureuil & Cougar #2603115
    Palerider
    Participant

    Steve, re your point 3:

    As part of the UAEAF order for new AS 350B-3’s, Eurocopter is taking back the UAEAF’s old AS 350B-3’s and selling them on to the RJAF

    This quote from AFM magazine (May ’05).

    Although after checking the RJAF order of battle on the scramble website (http://www.scramble.nl) which lists 5sq (the most likely unit) as still operating the Hughes 500 and makes no mention of Squirrel’s (the OOB is fairly up to date as it lists the RJAF’s recently delivered EC635’s). As to what all this means im not sure but thought it was worth posting!

    in reply to: Singapore F-16 upgrades to Block 60 #2603122
    Palerider
    Participant

    I think the date of the article says it all….perhaps this was the Singaporean mindef’s “fallback plan” if the F-15/Rafale competition didnt work out? Anyway RSiAF’s F-16’s are pretty new and highly spec’ed so they dont need upgrading yet (there are a lot of other F-16’s out there that need a Block 60 upgrade before Singapore’s!)

    in reply to: Things spotters (don't) do #410317
    Palerider
    Participant

    waaaaahhhhhhh nobody ever asks me if I would like to go up for a flight (I’d even pay for lunch…) waaahhhhh

    Couldnt have put it better myself rollo although as like to spot (sorry, avaition enthuse) military aircraft i think my chances are pretty slim! Although the RAAF has female pilots now, so maybe i might pick up a ride in a Herc…..

    btw Trinny, next time im on your side of the world i will be be looking you up (and like rollo i’ll be a gentleman and buy lunch 😉 )
    Seriously tho yours was a v nice gesture & i hope you weren’t discouraged by a few ‘grumpy old men’

    in reply to: General Discussion #341561
    Palerider
    Participant

    Goddam it! if im going to work back at the office (its about 7pm local in my little corner of the world) i NEED that forum 😮 ! ****** it, im off to the local, lets hope the internet fairy fixes this by tomorrow

    in reply to: Military aviation forum gone? #1929097
    Palerider
    Participant

    Goddam it! if im going to work back at the office (its about 7pm local in my little corner of the world) i NEED that forum 😮 ! ****** it, im off to the local, lets hope the internet fairy fixes this by tomorrow

    in reply to: General Discussion #341578
    Palerider
    Participant

    Palerider, you can’t see the forum even if you’re logged out of your account and viewing as a guest?

    Coirrect SOC. And i tried your “somebody try this” suggestion then i couldnt even find the “sticky”about Mil av forum gone, i had to get right out of everything & start over agian (hence the time to respond)

    in reply to: Military aviation forum gone? #1929108
    Palerider
    Participant

    Palerider, you can’t see the forum even if you’re logged out of your account and viewing as a guest?

    Coirrect SOC. And i tried your “somebody try this” suggestion then i couldnt even find the “sticky”about Mil av forum gone, i had to get right out of everything & start over agian (hence the time to respond)

    in reply to: General Discussion #341606
    Palerider
    Participant

    And no, the forums aren’t deleted, I can still get in there just fine.

    Bully for you SOC i still cant (yes i tried your suggestion). How will i cope without the Mil Av forum participants careful & well thought out comments & ideas? (See? im losing it already!) Anyone else got any ideas?

    in reply to: Military aviation forum gone? #1929130
    Palerider
    Participant

    And no, the forums aren’t deleted, I can still get in there just fine.

    Bully for you SOC i still cant (yes i tried your suggestion). How will i cope without the Mil Av forum participants careful & well thought out comments & ideas? (See? im losing it already!) Anyone else got any ideas?

    in reply to: Build your own air force scenario 3!! #2606135
    Palerider
    Participant

    Interesting scenario….assuming the Soviets didnt roll about 20 Guards Tank divisions through the place or pop the odd tac nuke (the gentle art of Russian persuasion…) the Czechs would need aircraft quickly (given the East German problem in your scenario) and aircraft that wouldnt be too hard to take into the inventory, so while the Mirage 2000 was probably the best non US/Soviet aircraft available (in 1986) im thinking it would cause logistics/maintenance (+ political) problems. So…..how about the Chinese? not exactly first rate equipment but available quickly, in quantity and pretty close to what the Czechs were operating already. Plus the fact the Chinese never miss an oppurtunity to fill a market vacated by the Russians 😉 Also the South Africans would be big on my shopping list (especially for anti tank stuff) as they have an effective home grown munitions industry, were still international pariahs in ’86 (so would sell to anyone) and knew what worked against warpac equipment (Angola etc).

    in reply to: What should Mexico replace their F-5 with? #2617728
    Palerider
    Participant

    Sorry i posted that twice guys, i dont think my views are twice as important as everyone elses! 😮

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 111 total)