What a very interesting selection of photos. Very much enjoyed looking at them.
Well I have finished my Spit. It’s ok not fantastic but I learnt a lot. 1:72 Anson next then my Old Warden Lysander
Chris

I’m sure it’s sad news for Tom……..but it does mean Katie Holmes is back on the market!
Whoohoo, think I have a chance this time.
I’m sure it’s sad news for Tom……..but it does mean Katie Holmes is back on the market!
Whoohoo, think I have a chance this time.
Thanks for all your replys, now I’m starting to understand how works.
The links are also very interesting and I will be having a read soon.
The sea plane thing is interesting I always thought they were float planes just to reduce weight of a heavy landing gear, I didn’t know about the need for long take off runs.
Chris
Thanks for all the answers and photos they are great, so when the airplane is at altitude, the air is less dense, thus the prop needs a more aggressive angle to the air (coarse pitch) to actually ‘bite’ into the thin atmosphere?
So when pilots of for instance the Mk1 spit forgot to change back to fine pitch for take off, why would the aircraft struggle to take off, was it related to air resistance on the prop or the motor unable to achieve the correct RPM?
I may have further confused myself if I have the coarse and fine the wrong way around.:confused:
I enjoyed reading my copy of the book very much, I showed it to my dad who was also very interested particularly the section about the Dehaviland prop reverse engineering and rebuild, I think it shows when it comes to engineering we are still world class.
Chris
Its very interesting, I like the unidentified photo’s. I have had a look but as yet I can not indentify anywhere.
But it can be so hard from the air?
Thanks for that, just bought it £2. As I live on the flight path for LBA it’s interesting to known what’s passing my house.
Thanks for that, just bought it £2. As I live on the flight path for LBA it’s interesting to known what’s passing my house.
I’m am reading this thread with interest as I build my spit, the paints looked awful as I painted straight onto the plastics. But now as I put on the second layer, the finish is better, so a undercoat would have certainly helped. Not to the quality of you guys but ok for me.
I think the main reason I am battling on with enamals is due to the cost of changing.
I will post a picture when I have finished, I think I depends how good it looks!
Just spent a while on the modellers web site, thanks for the link. Very interesting site. Primer would appear to be the way to go (a bit late for my spit though) so in simple terms, fo you prime everything on the spurs or removed then construct the kit, or does it differ kit to kit?
I suppose it would be a good idea to mask or remove paint from glue points.
I have rebuilt a mk1 golf gti over the last few years, I’m sure it’s was easyer than this!!!
Thank you for the replies
I have a compresser already so a spray gun may be an option.
It would be nice to keep using the enamal tins as I have so many of them.
I must admit I did not wash the plastics first, is this to remove general dirt or is there a release compound on the plastics?
I’m still enjoying building the spit but it’s a learning curve all over again! Got a Lysander to do next with the shuttleworth collection codes, time to dig out the matt black!
Thanks for the replies, it has certainly given me something to look into.
Thank you
Now there are three!
Please feel free to add photos as there is currently only one member……..me!