BAE are there own worst enemies, let’s face it their record on contract delivery isn’t great. The Nimrod MR4 is a prime example, price has rocketed and now the RAF will get what,12, aircraft? And plenty of engineers at the time stated that BAe’s proposals were not viable at their cost estimates.
Has anybody seen the levels of investment, recruitment and long term planning going on at AWE lately? Kind of indicates the UK won’t lose a nuclear capability anytime soon.
You mean like Cavour?
Or the CVF in it’s planned initial configuration.
My view is that with defence there is a legitimate justification for helping domestic industry even if it costs more, to preserve the industrial base, maintain expertise and retain an independent capability to avoid becoming a hostage to foreign suppliers. Not all countries have that capability, but in marine engineering and ship building Finland does, and they should try and preserve it rather than going for a short term cost saving.
The thing that disturbs me is the hypocricy, Bribery is Banned in Islam so is Adultery.[thats why they wants to stop the investigation, their image will be shatterred]
When these guys indulges themselved in it, and preaches something outside its weird.
You said it, the Saudi Royal family are the biggest hypocrites out there, a ghastly group of people. They made a satanic deal with the religeous hardliners decades ago that they’d live with religeous extremism in return for the religeous types turning a blind eye to their own decadent and vile lifestyles.
Italy builds good ships. So does Finland. If Finland buys Italian warships I imagine they’ll be perfectly good ships, but it’s still a shame to see a country with such an excellent maritime industrial base as Finland going to foreign builders. In my own opinion, and it is just my own opinion based on my time working in offshore oil, Finnish marine equipment is as good as it gets, and I’d put Finland alongside Norway and Japan as probably the best quality suppliers out there at least for commercial maritime equipment.
Once the F35B is available I’m guessing countries will design ships around it in the same way the Harrier stimulated a few countries to build small carriers only suitable for Harrier or helicopter operation.
Nuclear is more flexible, but face it, it’s not affordable, not even for the USN. Nuclear replenishment ships would be prohibitive, the economic vs. capability argument is finely balanced for carriers and subs, for everything else there just isn’t an argument as the economic argument speaks for itself. As Unicorn infers, if the Tico ships had been nuclear you’d have seen a similar situation to the current DD(X) situation with massive costs pushing the type into a marginalised silver bullet force of 4-6 hulls and the USN looking for a cheaper alternative. And if DD(X) was nuclear, the USN would struggle to afford 1 or 2 hulls without creating a crises in other programs. And even in todays world of active arrays, SM-3, Aster etc. numbers do still count.
About the damage issue that is a legitimate concern, and there are real environmental implications too even if a nuclear ships takes heavy damage that doesn’t result in total loss.
If it wasn’t for the fact that if the Typhoon is cancelled then they’ll just buy the Rafale or more F15’s, or some other high spec fighter then I’d say great, cancel the things. Why countries like the USA, UK and France are arming up a country like Saudi Arabia beats me, quite aside from the ghastly practices of their ruling royal family (anybody who’s done business with them knows the grotesque hypocrisy of them being all holier than thou at home then demanding prostitutes and trips to casinos, all seen through an alcoholic haze, when they’re outside Saudi) and the religeous sect of Wahabbism which gives Islam a bad name they’re far closer to Islamist terrorism than any of the other countries our countries blame for being connected to terrorism. A joke.
Attack helicopters have been to sea many times, not least the AH1 family. Putting a helicopter on a LPH may seem no big deal, but taking the AH64D to sea is a significant development when the original model is not marinised. This hasn’t got a lot of coverage but the UK decision to marinise their AH64D’s with a requirement that they be operable from RN vessels was quite a significant capability improvement in the AH64D. Just as the fact that the LPH and Invincible class CVL’s now have an attack helicopter capability (and a superb attack helicopter at that, despite it’s critics the AH64D is a helicopter almost any force in the world would love in it’s arsenal) is a significant move for them. So all in all yes, seeing an attack helicopter at sea and seeing a flat top with attack helicopters may be nothing new, seeing the AH64D at sea and seeing RN vessels with attack helicopters is worthy of comment (although Ocean has had this capability for a while).
About the Harrier and it’s demise, the F35B is on the horizon and I expect that the F35B will give a whole new impetus to naval aviation, with more countries building ski jump equipped STOVL carriers or multi-purpose LPH/LPHD type vessels.
it is not hopeless. you just emigrate Finnish people back to Karelia and support independent movement. that is how China reclaim some land back that is stolen. right now even, many Chinese move back to Siberia, every Chinese know Siberia belong to them.
( 🙁
Have you ever stopped to consider what would hapen if every country in the world re-opened centuries old real estate disputes??? Do you really want permanent war across the globe? Pretty dumb.
A shame, Finland has a first class shipbuilding and marine engineering industry, with some genuine world class companies like Wartsila.
At the risk of stating the obvious, UNIFIL isn’t there to start a war, it’s there to try and keep the two sides from restarting a war. The Israeli’s are testing UNIFIL and seeing what they can get away with, neither side has any intention of escalating these incidents into a war.
The political factors and the wish to support British industry were certainly a big factor in the UK decision not to pursue the Tico option, if memory serves me right they were also concerned about costs, not just aquisition but also operating cost and the UK was under a lot of pressure to be more European (one of those funny little urban myths, many other European nations think the UK is uncle sams doorstep into Europe, many Americans think the UK is in the pocket of the EU) which was important at the time. My own view is that in defence programs the consideration of protecting the industrial base and expertise is a perfectly legitimate factor, but too often in Britain this has been over riding and led to some real crap being foisted on our forces.
Unicorn beat me to it with a similar proposal to the RAN, which does kind of indicate the USN did look at ways of preserving these hulls but found no takers.