What’s the odd 100 million here and there in a government budget that can blow literally billions on IT programs that never enter service, a health system that is a perpetual black hole for money, an ID card scheme virtually nobody particularly wants, paying off a semi-permanent underclass not to cause too much trouble etc etc? :confused:
Hi Francois, that is indeed correct, their RTM’s were already the marinised variant, I should have said relative to the engines on other AH64’s which are not marinised.
Indonesia could be a great country, it is a wonderful country in most respects with a warm hearted and kind people and access to some good natural resources. However government corruption, an ineffective central authority and problems with ethnic/regional conflict in parts of the archipelago will prevent Indonesia’s development to join the other high growth Asian economies until these problems are sorted out. That’s not being anti-Indonesian or xenophobic, it’s just a fact. I worked for a company that ended up transferring all project management for a few remaining projects in Indonesia to Singapore and decided it wasn’t worth the hassle of bidding for more contracts there when there was lower risk projects elsewhere without all the complications of graft, paying off local officials, dealing with the TNI and the risks of piracy etc. Again that may be sad but it’s also true.
Materials were given corrosion protection for marine operation, the fasteners etc. were given attention to minimise corrosion, folding rotors, the engines were marinised for salf water ingress through the compressor, the air frame was adjusted for secure stowage and i believe both cockpit stations have flight controls.
Yep, Swan Hunter just wasn’t up to the job of managing the LSD(A) program and it was a disaster both for Swan Hunter and for the RFA. At the very most they should have been subcontracted by BAE to assemble the boats with BAE managing things, even that would have been high risk.
In those years it was indeed often a question of management/commercial inertia, but they did have a huge skills base and the infrastructure needed to build ships on a huge scale, sadly that just isn’t there anymore. I once went to a IMarE lecture where a former chairman of British ship builders argued very strongly that the politicised nature of government management of that body played a key role in the demise of the whole industry as prders were fed to shipyards in constituencies important to MP’s rather than the yards that may have had a future, and sadly his arguments had the ring of truth.
Basically almost all modern commercial vessels are built to standardised designs and using modular construction, and can be built very quickly and still maintain good quality. However UK yards now lack the infrastructure, skills base and access to materials to match the exertions of 1939-45, British yards just don’t have the capabilities anymore for anything other than limited projects. Even the military builders are struggling against a skills problem largely due to the cyclical nature of warship building and the fact few people with sense would go into ship building in the UK today unless there was nothing else. BAE are trying to turn things around, but the two LPD’s were built to appallingly poor standards.
One of the principle differences between the WAH64-D and other Apaches is that the British examples were marinised from day one and always intended for maritime ops. Apparentley the US has been looking at them to get info in case their own AH64’s ever need to operate from offshore.
My own view is the UK needs a genuine defence review, not the usual half baked means of slashing spending whilst attempting to do the same, but a fundamental decision on whether the UK retains a self defence force which would require a whole lot less money, or wants to punch above our weight which requires a whole lot more money. The current pathetic attempts to try and do everything but refusing to provide the neccessary funding to do it is the worst possible solution to our defence needs IMO. If we truly want the CVF’s then we also need more frigates and destroyers, a bigger SSN program and more JSF’s than are now being mentioned.
What a baseless claim…..
proof :confused: you just have anti Indonesian sentiment…. 😡
Apart from various IMO documents on security I got whilst managing offshore drilling rigs off Indonesia and various UK government advice on piracy in the area, combined with hard evidence over many years you mean? And before you make a dumbass accusation that I’m racist you should STFU and remember you know nothing about my personal circumstances and links to that potentially great country 😡
This sort of penis waving argument is usually related to a certain other country in Asia-Pacific, come on guys a wonderful country like Australia is above dumbass “my boats bigger than yours” stupidity.
The Collins class is a superb SSK with huge potential, it also owes an aweful lot to Sweden. However, it is the fact that the RAN have superb training and tactics that is the icing on the cake.
And yes, I also have immense respect for the Japanese boats and think the Japanese ship building industry is the best in the world.
Reminds me of the thread on whether Italy could bear Spain or France and the UK, pretty pointless and dumb. If people insist on arguing over who will kick who’s ass then at least compare navies that may possibly have a reason to fight eachother :rolleyes:
In other words (implied so as to not upset Parlaiment) she is a parts source for the other 2, and who wants to buy a stripped hulk?
Canada.
To take action to stop piracy the most important thing is you need to want to end it, when many pirates are either protected by military officers or profit sharing with the relevant TNI units in their area don’t expect many miracles.
If you want equations and cycles then buy a thermodynamics text book, it’s not like there’s a shortage of them.