dark light

Turbinia

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 879 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sylver VLS #2040950
    Turbinia
    Participant

    One aspect of this is that if Sampson and it’s battle field management system had been integrated with Mk.41 VLS and SM-2/3 it’d have much stronger export prospects, as most navies are going to go with the Mk.41, SM/ESSM/Harpoon and why look at a sensor/control suite with no track record of working with these systems when the APAR and AEGIS systems are proved and offer equivalent (in some respects better) functionality?

    in reply to: Roll out of HMS Clyde – New Helecopter capable OPV #2040953
    Turbinia
    Participant

    They’re 25 years old, and it’s been 25 years of operating in harsh seas, I’m not sure that they’re really ships countries would want other than at the bottom end of the market with countries unable to pay for anything newer. Destroyers and Frigates can have very long lives as they’re so expensive and often don’t spend much time at sea, but OPV’s are not really high value vessels and do spend a lot of time at sea.

    in reply to: Roll out of HMS Clyde – New Helecopter capable OPV #2040967
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Would River class OPV’s be a good option for T&T? Those boats are built for long endurance in heavy weather, they’re not very fast (that was a trade off for sea keeping and endurance) and they’re pretty big boats for offshore patrol. I’d have thought T&T would want a high speed design, especially for drugs interdiction, and whilst I know the weather in the Caribbean and Atlantic shelf can be severe T&T is well South of the hurricane area and it’s not like the North Sea or south Atlantic. Most of their offshore installations are not that far offshore either, it’s not like Brazil or the North sea where some of the rigs are way way out to sea.

    in reply to: Roll out of HMS Clyde – New Helecopter capable OPV #2040972
    Turbinia
    Participant

    I will be interested to see who ends up buying the Castle class vessels, far too handy to be scrapped or shot up.

    Call me a cynic, but if it follows usual UK practice then the British tax payer will stump up millions on a major refit/upgrade and then immediately sell them to somebody else for about 5 pence 🙂

    in reply to: Sylver VLS #2040995
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Cheers, the T45 was built from outset with reserve bouyancy, power and space for upgrades and fitting additional weapons (a big lesson learned from the T42…), but if they’d gone with the mk.41 it’d have been a lot easier. I also hope we don’t end up being pressured to adopt scalp over tomahawk for a combination of politics and because it’s easier to integrate into Sylver.

    in reply to: Roll out of HMS Clyde – New Helecopter capable OPV #2041073
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Thanks for the info, I guess there will be plenty of time to clear her for EH101 ops. Do Bristow still operate the S61N down South for SAR and stuff? A few years since I was down there 🙂 This vessel does seem to have a lot of promise, I know a lot of people dismiss her as nothing more than a net checker, but the design seems to have a lot of growth potential for future derivatives, good sea going ability, good operating costs and is more than adequate for general Police/Coast Guard duties, freeing up the true surface combatants for duties better suited to them. I think one reason these boats get a bad press in some quarters is that in many other countries they would actually be Coast Guard/Police/civil enforcement agency vessels, so there isn’t that expectation of them being warships that comes from flying a naval ensign.

    in reply to: Tawian F-15? #2565598
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Nothing like brainless sheep waving little red books in the name of progress……..

    Mind you, you gotta say if Communism means you can do anything to make $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$’s and be obsessed by making money with no thoughts about any poor schmucks left behind who are thrown on a scrap heap then maybe we’ve got it all wrong, who needs capitalism when you can have chinese communism? :p

    in reply to: Tawian F-15? #2565605
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Oh, c’mon, Turbinia, everyone knows that the Red Chinese are peace loving when it comes to the Republic of China. Never mind the fact that RoC is the only thing that gives the Reds any sort of military purpose since the Reds don’t wanna put their balls on the block when push comes to shove in the international stage.

    Yep, them peace loving communists showed their love of peace and justice in that there cultural revolution they had…I bet the Taiwanese are really pissed they missed the opportunity to join in that :p

    in reply to: Tawian F-15? #2565608
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Yes, and if they decide to change it then it’s their choice. If they want to join the PRC then fine. If they want the current status quo to continue then fine. If they change their constitution then fine. However the choice should be theirs, not bullied into it by a next door dictatorship that shows it’s respect for justice by a massacre of it’s own people if they try and voice their own opinion.

    in reply to: One stupid question #2565627
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Oh I don’t know, the Typhoon has that 27mm cannon, the one that’s used as ballast, and the Meteor BVRAAM that’s only being tested on the JAS39 as the 4 nations in EF are refusing to stump up the cash to integrate it into the Typhoon…..hang on, I see your point.

    in reply to: Chobham armour invulnerable? #1807459
    Turbinia
    Participant

    That’s always been the case, maybe to differing degrees but since the introduction of tanks there have always been weak spots vulnerable to attack.

    in reply to: Tawian F-15? #2565651
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Did the Communists observe law when it usurped the legally recognised government of China by civil war:confused: In which case their claims to some legal moral high ground are a bit empty.

    in reply to: Tawian F-15? #2565655
    Turbinia
    Participant

    Why is the PRC so scared of allowing the RoC a free choice then? Or for that matter giving their own people a free choice in their own destiny? Or Tibet for that matter? And to answer your question, if part of the UK had been living as a de facto independent state for 60 years decided to declare formal independence I’d say it would make sense as what is the point of living a charade and pretending a country that has seperated from you is still part of your country? :confused: And I know a lot of Canadians who’d love to give Qubec independence.

    in reply to: We're doooooomed!! #2565714
    Turbinia
    Participant

    No, it was that toss bag waste of space Rifkind, although now I tend to look back on those 90’s years almost as a halycon golden age for the UK forces compared to what followed 🙂

    in reply to: Roll out of HMS Clyde – New Helecopter capable OPV #2041089
    Turbinia
    Participant

    May sound thick here but what is a 80m Offshore Patrol Vessel (Helicopter), 😮 :confused:

    James

    A patrol boat with a heli-deck.

Viewing 15 posts - 631 through 645 (of 879 total)