dark light

Atlantic1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 278 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #686778
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    I hope the cabin crew and flight deck on the ATR aren’t going to be layed off because of this

    Can’t speak for the CC as they are bmi, but we already have work lined up for the ATR, so it won’t effect AAT staff at all.

    Tom.

    in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #730166
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    I hope the cabin crew and flight deck on the ATR aren’t going to be layed off because of this

    Can’t speak for the CC as they are bmi, but we already have work lined up for the ATR, so it won’t effect AAT staff at all.

    Tom.

    in reply to: DC6 Airborne #1342863
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Considering they have been sat out on the grass for some time, G-APSA purred like a big kitten today! Not often you get a Shack and a 6 running at the same time in the same place these days either 😮

    Tom.

    in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #686966
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Its amazing how much changes in your 4 days off!

    LBA-LCY is to stop, maybe as early as next week. ATR will be kept on for a little while longer but not the 6 months they had decided last week and will possibly move to MAN but this is all still undecided at the moment.

    Tom.

    in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #730325
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Its amazing how much changes in your 4 days off!

    LBA-LCY is to stop, maybe as early as next week. ATR will be kept on for a little while longer but not the 6 months they had decided last week and will possibly move to MAN but this is all still undecided at the moment.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Dakota G-AMPY #1345005
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    She does look good 🙂

    I imagine it will be RA visiting Jersey as PY has no seats.

    Tom.

    in reply to: DC6 Airborne #1345065
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    PS IF ANYBODY FROM OPERATIONS IS LISTENING I WOULD NOT BE OFFENDED IF THE ‘SIX WAS ROUTED OVER THE FOOTBALL GROUND, AT A RESPECTABLE ALTITUDE OF COURSE

    Sorry Will, day off!

    I believe it was up for crew training. Now the ATR operation is more or less up and running they could well be wanting to get them back on the ad-hoc freight market and earning some cash.

    See you all Saturday!

    Tom.

    in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #689527
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Hmm… That is interesting, if, as Tom says, they have signed up to the ATR for the next 6 months, could they use it on any other routes?

    I *think* this has been looked at but not being directly involved with that side of things I couldn’t say for sure. I imagine the most likely thing to happen would be the cancellation of the 507/8, leaving just the early morning and evening sectors.

    Tom.

    in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #732741
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Hmm… That is interesting, if, as Tom says, they have signed up to the ATR for the next 6 months, could they use it on any other routes?

    I *think* this has been looked at but not being directly involved with that side of things I couldn’t say for sure. I imagine the most likely thing to happen would be the cancellation of the 507/8, leaving just the early morning and evening sectors.

    Tom.

    in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #689682
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Interesting, considering they have just signed up our ATR for another 6 months.

    Tom :rolleyes:

    in reply to: LBA to LCY route to be dropped #732872
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Interesting, considering they have just signed up our ATR for another 6 months.

    Tom :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Gnat photos #1347233
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    One from Elvington 2002.

    Tom.

    in reply to: Today at Air Atlantique #1348629
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Hey John, Will.

    Had a quick look at PY this afternoon whilst passing through. Looks great in its new scheme!

    Tom.

    in reply to: Vampire, Venom, etc, etc, etc. #1351490
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Bruce,

    When you say Mk.3 are you referring to the NF3 and subsequent FAW versions?

    Cheers,

    Tom.

    in reply to: Vampire, Venom, etc, etc, etc. #1352006
    Atlantic1
    Participant

    Biggest difference was the Venom’s all new high speed swept wing. It also had a redesigned tail unit, more powerful engine, hydraulically operated ailerons, tip tanks and revised cockpit layout. Performance was much improved in all areas over the Vampire.

    Tom.

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 278 total)