dark light

Geforce

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 2,805 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eggheads for evil #1981112
    Geforce
    Participant

    I doubt if Steve is concerned with accuate chronology, exact context or precise definitions

    Have to side with Arthur. It’s an easy solution to describe historical facts as being leftwing. In fact Sauron, you might describe my semantic discussions as useless, however, defining the exact meaning is the first step. You can’t just ignore ‘these facts’ wheter you are right or leftwing. You can use an argument to prove your statement, but you can’t just invent ‘facts’, otherwise you make the same faults as the totallitarian regimes you all fear.

    And I did matter for the Jews. In fact, it was even an Israeli commission who started a campaign against western-European gov’ts (Netherlands, Belgium and France) to recognise the holocaust as an isolated case from the rest of WWII.

    Almost forgot Henry Ford. Replace the word “T-4” by “Jew” and one might have an idea of where the nazi’s got their idea of rationally exterminating a whole population. Ford was not a nazi, true, but you can hardly call him a “lefty”, can you?

    “Teaching history is not useless” I hope. 🙂 Otherwise I’ll be damned (as long as the gov’t is giving my pay-checks though at the end of the month). Teaching history to a bunch of biased right/left-wingers is.

    Grey Area,

    You were right, I was wrong, sorry. Fascism indeed is a 20th century-term, I looked it up. 🙂 The mythology is 2000 years old though. But still I would be carefull defining racism. Saying your race is superior, as did Hitler, is pure racism. However, what with the more moderate interpretations of “if you don’t like it here, go back to your own country.” This may shock some people, but you can hardly call it racism. That’s what I meant.

    in reply to: Eggheads for evil #1981202
    Geforce
    Participant

    I would leave out the words nationalism and racism. Fascism itself is a 2000 year old invention, nationalism and racism (scientific racism – blood ties) are 19th/20th century. I think the word imperialism would be more appropriate, ie wanting to expand. Killing thousands of people can happen, but more as a result rather than the original goal (=economy). I know, it all sounds like semantic crap, but we have to be carefull using these kind of terms. Ofcourse I’m not legitimising Mussolini’s actions in Africa, which were most certainly racist, but the ideology of fascism itself was not.

    in reply to: Eggheads for evil #1981218
    Geforce
    Participant

    Geforce, isnt being anti Jewish facist?

    Nope. In fact, fascism was not racist at all. Sure, it was influenced during the war period but it’s starting point was not racist. Even nationalism doesn’t have to be racist (look at the US today, a “multicultural” world of intollerance). Nazism was anti-semite, anti-Gay, anti-slavic etc.

    Did you know that the first decades after WII few talked about the Jewish suffering in the concentration camps? Dachau was used as a usefull tool to inform the public opinion about the dangers of totallitarianism (= communism), and hence, the holocaust itself deserved little attention untill the sixties.

    in reply to: Eggheads for evil #1981276
    Geforce
    Participant

    J’accuse …

    Is this your opinion or did you copy it? I know you will acuse me of being an intellectual leftist (hence the quote in the introduction :D) but there are some anachronic mistakes in your historical essay. A totallitarian regime is NOT the opposite of a democratic regime first of all, in fact, totallitarianism and democracy can cooperate quite well, McCarthyism being just one example. An authoritarian regime though doesn’t necessairly have to be totallitarian, just have a look at the 17th century Dutch Republic. I’m not saying this, but a neo-con historian named Francis Fukuyama. You use words in a wrong context. Germany was not fascist, it was national-socialist. A huge difference, a difference that wanted Mussolini cooperate rather with the allies than with Hitler. Islamic fascism? Huh? Can you give me a definition of fascism? Un-democratic?

    Another example: you say it’s the “leftists” who made it possible WWII happened. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Short-sighted. In fact, I could even claim the opposite. It was nationalism that made Hitler’s party to gain voters: the humiliating consequences of the treaty of Versailles. In 1918 all major European allied powers wanted to punish Germany severe for triggering WWI. Germany had to pay back everything which was impossible ofcourse. France was quite nationalist in this matter too. Only the US and it’s president Woodrow Wilson was more reasonable stating that first concern was stability in Europe and NOT punishing Germany. But ofcourse, he’s a lefty.

    Intellectuals can be a pain in the ass, I know, but history is MORE complicated than you might think. Comparing the war in Iraq to the war against Germany resembles a lot to the offical nazi-historiography: they also compared their fight with previous leaders such as Frederik Barbarossa and Bismarck. So either you are way too simplistic, or you are just writing propaganda pretending to make history look easy. History itself can be quite a weapon you know, especially if you try to look for continuity. Churchill is not Bush. Again, this is not my personal opinion, but Robert Kagan’s (A pagan ethos, I suggest you read his book, it’s only 156 pages or so).

    In your reply I would like you to avoid follwing words/constructions
    – leftist intellectual
    – tree hugger
    – artists
    – freedom = democracy
    – you anti-US ***** bugger off

    in reply to: Left or Right, what's the difference?? #1981848
    Geforce
    Participant

    Geforce you’re a right-winger? Maybe in Europe the definition of right versus left is the opposite because here in the States I’m a right-winger, and proud of it.

    And as you know we agree on NOTHING….so I’m rather confused.

    I honestly don’t’ care what anyone thinks about my beliefs. If they want to think I’m evil then so be it because I couldn’t care less.

    No reason to get confused. Being rightwing doesn’t mean I am pro-Bush. I am rightwing in Belgium, but in the US I’ll be, a democrat, so leftwing.

    in reply to: Left or Right, what's the difference?? #1981854
    Geforce
    Participant

    Why not. There’s also Noam Chomsky and so on.

    in reply to: Anzac Dollars, not such a bad idea #1981882
    Geforce
    Participant

    Yes but the Euro was not meant for practical use either. In fact, monetarian unions aren’t that new, they existed already in the 19th century (Zollverein, Germany). If Australia and NZ can manage to make an agreement, why not? I think it’ would be a lot more easy between Aus and NZ than it was in Europe. Same language, no cold war (and 1000 years of constant war before).

    in reply to: Last meal #1981888
    Geforce
    Participant

    Seafood. Crabs, Lobster, Prawns, and shellfish. the French way. Folowed by battered cod, chips and mushy peas the English way. Then strawberry pavlova. Washed down with belgian beers and finished with a G&T.

    Nah I would go for the Fugu this time 😉 I wouldn’t give them the pleasure of executing me.

    in reply to: Left or Right, what's the difference?? #1981892
    Geforce
    Participant

    GWB is a neo-conservative. AFAIK these neo-cons were very much inspired by a marxist American thinktank. Is that right? That could explain GWB’s trend to increase gov’t.

    Cutting back on gov’t in all areas except national security. That sounds a bit like a totallitarian regime though, a “democratic totallitarian regime”, maybe. I can understand why Americans are afraid of their gov’t though, because it scares the sh!t out of people by all kinds of terrorist threats. A gov’t should not scare its people, in fact, it should call them down.

    in reply to: For a change, a boat in the Solent… #1982411
    Geforce
    Participant

    I like the flag

    in reply to: Left or Right, what's the difference?? #1982698
    Geforce
    Participant

    He was not even a conservative. They called themselves the “new world order”. They didn’t like catholicism either.

    in reply to: Left or Right, what's the difference?? #1982719
    Geforce
    Participant

    Mussolini started his carreer as a socialist though. 🙂

    in reply to: My "Vacation" #1983007
    Geforce
    Participant

    The Belgian front whishes you good lock and promises you not to post pictures of crashed Phantoms while you’re gone 🙂 (that’ll be quite low of us). Take care and don’t let the bed-bugs bite.

    in reply to: European Championship #1983170
    Geforce
    Participant

    No fun without national team playing. What do I do with my flag now? I’m just no football lover, I’m one of those who watch football for the athmosphere (drinking a beer while etc). If there’s no team you favour, the only thing which remains is “technical” football. Nice if you love the game, but I don’t. 🙁

    in reply to: Ex-President Ronald Reagan dies aged 93!! #1983173
    Geforce
    Participant

    Yeah true, it’s always better to be moderate. But during some situaties (like war) you’ll HAVE to chose. that’s just fate of mankind. Grey is a nice thing for daily use, but there are situations where you have to chose, otherwise you are either naive or too lazy too make a choise.

Viewing 15 posts - 271 through 285 (of 2,805 total)