“In all of this Turing had options where he could have taken a different course with maybe different results. None of what I have read indicates that he was treated any differently to anybody else in the same situation”.
Quite so, he may have decided that he was better off at university, and not joined the Bletchley park team, that would have been the right choice for him personally, as his sexual preference, coupled with his top secret work, wouldn’t have caused him to become a security risk, unless of course the Nazis, who by this time had starved the UK into capitulation, (not least because of their successful campaign in the Atlantic) installed a “puppet” govt in their new territory “England”; apparently they were a bit down on homosexuality as well…….
We all have choices, but some times our destiny is in some way pre-ordained, and our destination will always be the same, regardless of the paths we take.
It’s here because of the significant contribution that Mr Turing made to the success of Coastal Command in the Battle of the Atlantic which, is in my opinion, a valid historic aviation subject.
You are welcome to pontificate about all the others caught by the unenlightened laws of those days. It just doesn’t happen to be a subject for Historic Aviation unless you can single out some examples of RFC / RAF victims?
Thank you for your valuable contribution. (What has Jimmy Savile to do with anything?)
Moggy
Well I was hoping to be able to say “at last something we can all agree on” but apparently not……
What other man made such an incalculable (pun intended) contribution to Britains salvation, and was treated as badly?
Or even a C119, the beauty of which is that you could get a least two smaller cockpits inside, and with a forum almost entirely populated with retired loadmasters, would present absolutely no logistical problems, and with all personal guarantees of safety in transit, (or any other van) no insurance will be required……
“I towed my car 2000 miles to the event…and I’m guessing they have more money than I do”.
Now that is truly impressive, puts us in the UK to shame! the furthest I went in a day was just 550 miles, with a pair of Vampire wings!
Let me be the first to capitulate and to say yes of course your all right,even those of you that have never done anything like this, and David has greatly impressed with his ability to balance gliders (and the like) on the back of his motor transport.
“Regards the Harrier moves the equipment was designed and prepared before the first moves -the aircraft were airworthy -dismantled and reassembled and flown . There wasn’t any margin for the aircraft or Hercules to be damaged during any of the process”.
Are you saying that there are no scratches on the inside the Hercules at all? the irony in this, is that we will never know whether you or I are right, unless we get to oversee the entire disassembly, move, reassembly, and the reverse of, as (quite obviously) any damage (however minor) will be made good, but to suggest that it can be accomplished without one single scratch, is frankly (to me at least) unbelievable.
A friend of mine moves his Spitfire replica around the country, maybe 20 times a year, the assembly and disassembly has been honed over a 3-4 year period, but stuff still happens, and damage and wear occurs; even where the fuselage rests on a purpose made padded tressle at the rear, the semi matt paint has been “polished” by minor movement.
David, I have come to the conclusion that you just enjoy the argument, I well remember the ding dongs you used to have with your namesake Damien Burke.
“It was never a case where they damaged a couple in the early days as they got used to doing it”!
That statement implies that they weren’t perfect at the job at the begining, if they “got used to doing it”, and I think you are confusing a genuine paint scratch with something that has penetrated the structure, whereas if I loaned an exhibit out and it came back with scratches in the paint, I’m not sure that reasuring me that it was only superficial would carry much weight.
It might be worthwhile pointing out that I don’t have a huge aversion to the loaning out of this, or maybe most other display airframes, I was defending the right of others to hold that opinion, and trying to show that out in the real world things do get damaged, (and repaired) but I now know it was a mistake to try and introduce the real world to this forum!
‘Anyone who thinks something as large as the Tiffy, which must be dismantled for transport will not be damaged at all, is a fool’ -Really ? The RAF regularily transported Harrier GR.3’s to Belize by C-130 -no damage occurred . The U.S Army moves helicopters in and out of Europe in very large numbers by RO-RO ship into Spain – very safely. The Typhoon is a very small aircraft compared to what is moving in and out of this country. Maybe you need to realise just how many dismantled aircraft are being moved by surface and air transport -the Typhoon dismantled is not a big deal.
Is this one going by C-130? and is there any comparison between moving new or nearly new A/C in purpose made transports, using tried and tested methods, probably borne out of experience ie, damage in the early days, and something that is 70 years old (ish) and has only been apart a couple of times, how many years ago? going “freight” on a container vessel (with only the egos of various forum members for company)
Will all the bolts pins and fastenings come out with no damage to the structure, or to the paint finish? is a few scratches in the paint of a modern a war plane/machine an issue? I don’t think so.
Can you guarantee that absolutely no damage what so ever will occur? because I wouldn’t dream of making such a sweeping statement.
And does it really have to cross the Atlantic to be reunited with it’s radiator? surely there is another way of getting the two together….
Stumbled onto this thread from a link from the “what’s wrong with this forum” thread; a couple of the guys, who are involved in projects of their own, (and for other people as well) who move them around to various venues for the benefit of the general public, at no charge, but not inconsiderable cost to themselves, express concerns about the possible damage to the sole surviving Typhoon,and a whole bunch of you descend on them like a ton of bricks, again we see the “dog with a bone” syndrome that defines this forum, I cant be wrong, I wont be wrong, I cant be wrong, I wont be wrong; Which of Thomas the tank engine’s friends used to say that? speaking of trains, does anyone believe that a large loco like the Scotsman, can be moved across the Atlantic, and not suffer a degree of salt water corrosion?
Anyone who thinks something as large as the Tiffy, which must be dismantled for transport will not be damaged at all, is a fool; to cite the movement around the world of artifacts that can be placed in hermetically sealed lead lined boxes, etc, etc as a reason why you should move something that cannot, is pointless, and yes the US did a good job in looking after it; it’s not going to the US though is it?
As J Boyle said, the B24 is a rare bird in the US, perhaps we are returning the favour, in looking after a couple for them?
Isn’t it a bit like an agnostic in a religious debate, where you keep asking for proof of existance, because you want it to be true?
Even if that were true (which it assuredly is not), over the years you have contributed more meaningful human interest posts than the rest of us put together.
Moggy
Slightly ironic given Kev35’s avatar, but that reminds me of the end scene in “the wizard of oz” where Dorothy turns to scarecrow, and says “I think I’ll miss you most of all”
On the other side of the coin is the “P40 lost in the Desert thread”, which was (at the start) full of helpful contributions, and compassionate thoughts, a great shame that it was all in vain, and even more that the thread was pulled, and for so long, but clearly we are not all bad.
You are probably right, we do have the choice, and as you say when it comes back around I will stay clear this time; but it’s worth looking at the the figures on that thread, and then you have to ask the question, with the huge amout of replys and even more views, looking from outside the forum, is it really not representative?
Well I think that the Burma thread was a good example of what is wrong with this forum, there (still) is no right or wrong, or good and bad, and because of that it got very personal; I said at the time that I thought the thread did a disservice to the forum, to my mind three forum members exhibited “terrier tendancies” i.e once they got their teeth into it they wouldn’t let go, despite the inability to prove mk12 wrong. “get over it, move on” if only they had.
Beep…….unexpected item in the cockpit area, please wait for assistance…….