dark light

knifeedgeturn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 467 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Early Merlin mark numbers #973013
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    They started off using letters A,B,C etc.

    in reply to: Recovered engines at Kidwelly Industrial Museum #974827
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    It’s definately an early Merlin; (one piece head and banks) I’m sure racer2 knows that, probably wants to know what A/C.

    Haven’t seen one without the coolant rail along the side of the block; where’s Merlin Pete when you need him?

    in reply to: Yesterday Channel – "Who Betrayed the Bomber Boys" #977019
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    You are both choosing to miss the point, as I’m sure you are aware the war in europe was over, and for most people of Britain that meant the war itself was over.

    The Japanese weren’t going to attack mainland Britain, and in a broader sense you could equate the war in the far east with Afganistan or Iraq,(of today) a long way away and (relatively speaking) very few people involved.

    I think CD makes a valid point, that the Nazi’s were looking at damage limitation, (by the time the Dresden raid takes place) Goebels simply adds a zero to the death toll inflating the figures from 25000 to 250000, knowing the full horror of the concentration camps was about to be exposed.

    The documentary also mentions that post war the Russians encouraged the people of Dresden to commemorate the bombing, stirring up bad feeling towards the west.

    Churchill fails to mention Bomber command in his VE day address, which in my view was a matter of poor judgement, (he never mentioned the done work at station x either, for a different reason maybe)

    Some how the allies had to pull themselves up from the mire of war; queensbury rules will get you killed, you have to be equally vicious as your opponent to win, but once you have won what then? swords maybe turned into ploughshares, but human beings are a little more complex, it takes a long time to forgive and forget, but equally most non combatants were sick of the war by it’s end, happy to move on to a bright future………..

    in reply to: Yesterday Channel – "Who Betrayed the Bomber Boys" #977699
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    The question is why? why did he criticise bomber command, was it because he was aware that public opinion was changing? was it because he genuinely thought that Dresden was hit too hard?

    He went to Berlin, to see for himself the devastation; I believe it reduced him to tears (as it probably would have done to most people)

    A politician pretty much all of his life, clearly he had his eye on the up and coming election; politicians tell people what they think they want to hear.

    He did however die in 1965, so if Churchill was against the idea of fully acknowledging bomber commands efforts, who has stopped this happening for the last 47 years?

    in reply to: Yesterday Channel – "Who Betrayed the Bomber Boys" #977877
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Is the answer Winston Churchill?

    The right answer is, all of us

    In our efforts to cleanse ourselves, post war, and remove ourselves from a position where the crys of “war criminals” might find sympathetic ears, (around the world) we abandoned those you did our dirty work for us; why else was the Labour govt elected imediately post war?

    in reply to: The ultimate what-if: Cancelled Spitfire progenitor #978431
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    I’ve seen mention that the Attackers wings, (that it inherited from the Spiteful) were, less efficient at high mark numbers, than those of the Spitfire; so much for progress

    in reply to: The ultimate what-if: Cancelled Spitfire progenitor #979879
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    What if the AM had fast tracked “Mitchells bomber” and in 1940, the response to the Luftwaffe attacks, was the carpet bombing of Berlin?

    in reply to: The ultimate what-if: Cancelled Spitfire progenitor #980410
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Yeah something like that; what a nice aeroplane.

    in reply to: The ultimate what-if: Cancelled Spitfire progenitor #980603
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Better off discussing the b12/36; at least that existed.

    in reply to: Barry Parkhouse details #982049
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    I’ve dropped stuff off at Kennet’s (for him) in the past.

    in reply to: Isaacs Spitfire #982227
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Yes I see what you mean; some of us do start projects, and push them to the back of the hangar/shed for a while, I’ve done it myself, either sold on or rekindled at a later date.

    in reply to: Isaacs Spitfire #982247
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Man, I haven’t thought about the Isaacs Spit for a long enough time. :rolleyes:

    I saw photos of this Spit when it was offered for sale on eBay a few years back. Would be intrigued to see what it looked like now.

    One that was being built in the States was going to use a Jabiru of some description.

    How are you getting on with your Isaacs?

    in reply to: I may get roasted but! #982983
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    When roasting one must take care not to burn ones own fingers….accusations of armchair whatever do appear to have fallen short of the mark.

    We have the right to expect value for money, in everything we purchase, but
    really, we must wait until we are in posession of the goods before complaining; don’t forget you get to look around the museum, and that costs £16 ish on a non event day.

    in reply to: battle in britain #984886
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Would that be me, or you?

    in reply to: SRI LANKA Airforce Museum #984909
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Only the seven year interlude then!

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 467 total)