dark light

knifeedgeturn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 467 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Early R.F.C. Wireless found at Shoreham #939715
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    It doesn’t apppear to contain any “electronic” components, and looks to be a large switch box.

    in reply to: Hawkinge WW artefacts #945261
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    PM sent.

    in reply to: Seen on eBay – 2013! #945267
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    My apologies to all those who sent me a message regarding items for sale; not exactly an April fools, but more a “I cant find a smiley that expresses jaded cynicism moment”

    in reply to: Seen on eBay – 2013! #946351
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    some of us have been flagged for advertising in the past or at least
    sailing very close to the line on the rules I think perhaps we need again to have some clarification from a mod as to what constitutes blatant selling or commercial advertising as laid down in the forum rules so we dont see any falling out over perhaps new forumites making a utter B****er of things and getting barred for not reading the lengthy rules or misunderstanding them ??

    mike E

    http://www.aircraftrestorationgroup.org
    http://www.whirlwindfighterproject.org

    I’m happy to sell direct to anyone here, or through my aerojumble, (I’ve just started) just email me for prices……..

    in reply to: "Ghetto airplane engine test" #954962
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Ok, didn’t realise it had been here before; “mad” was tongue in cheek as I do know Pete! (all the same I’d like to hear his thoughts, on the moment the pallet started to “rotate”)

    in reply to: History rewritten – Wright brothers didnt fly first? #967439
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Didn’t the Wright Bros patent essentially cover all means of controlling an A/C, which lead to the dispute with Curtis?

    Isn’t the PPL rating for a twin A/C because direction can be controlled by the engines?

    in reply to: Britain Drops "Aero" #969036
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    the Royal AEROnautical Society has just begun to use the American word “airplane” instead of “aeroplane,”

    Is it only me that see’s an irony here?

    in reply to: Supermarine Type B12/36, 317 #977380
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    It may be reasonable to presume that with the bombing of the Woolston factory, that it was not just the prototype that was destroyed, but the drawings as well; certainly none seem to exist, and that would have put paid to the development.

    Supermarine didn’t have the capacity to build the bomber in anycase,and probably never realised the longevity of the Spitfire, and that design work would still be going on to the wars end; it’s well known that Vickers (chief) designer Wallis didn’t get on too well with Mitchell (or vice versa) and that wouldn’t have helped with the adoption of the project by Vickers.

    in reply to: Supermarine Type B12/36, 317 #977612
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Whether it was for hangarage or just because the AM wanted the wing span that width, surely the issue is why would it have been nearly 100mph faster than the Lanc, (retractable turrets notwithstanding) and has nobody noticed that the tail changes from a twin fin, to a single between the two drawings?

    in reply to: Supermarine Type B12/36, 317 #979640
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Wasn’t that an AM specification at the time to utilise existing hangars?

    The bomber had retractable turrets, so unlikely that they would have been “off the shelf items” in any case anything Supermarine would have been their own complicated design; because they could!

    in reply to: 1913 Roberts engine being reverse-engineered #991132
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Crankshaft started off at 900lbs and has a finished weight of 28lbs; thats a lot of machining!

    in reply to: Spitfire from Lowestoft. #992331
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Am I losing it, or are the wings clipped in the first photo and complete in the rest?

    Impressive project – looks great!

    No you aren’t losing it; they were originally clipped to help finish it off quickly, now the wing tips have been built, it wears them as was intended.

    Apparently he’s building another one………..

    in reply to: If the Flypast Forum folded, where would you go to? #994775
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Relax Mike, it was only tongue in cheek! in any case there are plenty of @rse holes within the industry, if you excluded them as well, we’d only need a conference call!

    in reply to: If the Flypast Forum folded, where would you go to? #994835
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    Sounds good, now all we need is a site dedicated to historic A/C, and a way of keeping all those who know absolutely nothing about the subject… out.

    in reply to: Spitfire R6915 #1003429
    knifeedgeturn
    Participant

    WELDING SOME ANCHOR POINTS ON!!! 😮

    Last week I couldn’t spell engineer…….

    This week, Ir1?

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 467 total)